Literature DB >> 23701641

Reviewing Biosphere Reserves globally: effective conservation action or bureaucratic label?

Kaera L Coetzer1, Edward T F Witkowski, Barend F N Erasmus.   

Abstract

The Biosphere Reserve (BR) model of UNESCO's Man and the Biosphere Programme reflects a shift towards more accountable conservation. Biosphere Reserves attempt to reconcile environmental protection with sustainable development; they explicitly acknowledge humans, and human interests in the conservation landscape while still maintaining the ecological values of existing protected areas. Conceptually, this model is attractive, with 610 sites currently designated globally. Yet the practical reality of implementing dual 'conservation' and 'development' goals is challenging, with few examples successfully conforming to the model's full criteria. Here, we review the history of Biosphere Reserves from first inception in 1974 to the current status quo, and examine the suitability of the designation as an effective conservation model. We track the spatial expansion of Biosphere Reserves globally, assessing the influence of the Statutory Framework of the World Network of Biosphere Reserves and Seville strategy in 1995, when the BR concept refocused its core objectives on sustainable development. We use a comprehensive range of case studies to discuss conformity to the Programme, the social and ecological consequences associated with implementation of the designation, and challenges in aligning conservation and development. Given that the 'Biosphere Reserve' label is a relatively unknown designation in the public arena, this review also provides details on popularising the Biosphere Reserve brand, as well as prospects for further research, currently unexploited, but implicit in the designation.
© 2013 The Authors. Biological Reviews © 2013 Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Man and the Biosphere Programme (MAB); UNESCO; biodiversity conservation; interdisciplinary science; protected areas; socio-ecological systems; spatial zonation; sustainable development; trade-offs

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23701641     DOI: 10.1111/brv.12044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  6 in total

1.  The race for space: tracking land-cover transformation in a socio-ecological landscape, South Africa.

Authors:  Kaera L Coetzer; Barend F N Erasmus; Edward T F Witkowski; Belinda Reyers
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Building Stakeholder Awareness and Engagement Strategy to Enhance Biosphere Reserve Performance and Sustainability: The Case of Kien Giang, Vietnam.

Authors:  Chu Van Cuong; Peter Dart; Nigel Dudley; Marc Hockings
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  An Investigation of the Critical Events and Influential Factors to the Evolution of the U.S. Man and the Biosphere Program.

Authors:  Jennifer M Thomsen
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-01-20       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Protected areas have a mixed impact on waterbirds, but management helps.

Authors:  Hannah S Wauchope; Julia P G Jones; Jonas Geldmann; Benno I Simmons; Tatsuya Amano; Daniel E Blanco; Richard A Fuller; Alison Johnston; Tom Langendoen; Taej Mundkur; Szabolcs Nagy; William J Sutherland
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Global conservation of species' niches.

Authors:  Jeffrey O Hanson; Jonathan R Rhodes; Stuart H M Butchart; Graeme M Buchanan; Carlo Rondinini; Gentile F Ficetola; Richard A Fuller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  BREMi-A New Tool for the Evaluation of UNESCO Biosphere Reserve Management Effectiveness: Case-study in the Arab Man and Biosphere (ArabMAB) Regional Network.

Authors:  Diane A Matar; Brandon P Anthony
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 3.644

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.