Literature DB >> 23700953

Response bias cannot explain action-specific effects: evidence from compliant and non-compliant participants.

Jessica K Witt1, Mila Sugovic.   

Abstract

According to the action-specific account of perception, the perceiver's ability to act influences perception of the target. For example, targets that are easier to acquire are reported to look closer, bigger, and slower. However, an alternative explanation for these effects is that they are due to response bias, rather than to changes in perception. To test the role of response bias, we employed two separate manipulations. We manipulated people's abilities to block a ball and measured the corresponding effects on estimated ball speed. We also created an explicit task demand by giving participants instructions that emphasized responding either slow or fast. Participants were grouped, based on whether they were compliant or non-compliant with the instructions. Regardless of their compliance, we found an action-specific effect of blocking ability on estimated speed. Given that non-compliant participants still showed the effect, the results provide strong evidence against a response-bias explanation of this action-specific effect. Paired with earlier research, we conclude that blocking ability influences perceived speed. Perception expresses the relationship between the environment and the perceiver, and this view is consistent with emerging neural and behavioral evidence for an interconnected perceptual-motor system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23700953     DOI: 10.1068/p7367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  9 in total

1.  Catching ease influences perceived speed: evidence for action-specific effects from action-based measures.

Authors:  Jessica K Witt; Mila Sugovic
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

Review 2.  Action potential influences spatial perception: Evidence for genuine top-down effects on perception.

Authors:  Jessica K Witt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

3.  Gaining knowledge mediates changes in perception (without differences in attention): A case for perceptual learning.

Authors:  Lauren L Emberson
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 12.579

4.  What you see and what you are told: an action-specific effect that is unaffected by explicit feedback.

Authors:  Zachary R King; Nathan L Tenhundfeld; Jessica K Witt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-03-02

Review 5.  Action-specific influences on perception and postperceptual processes: Present controversies and future directions.

Authors:  John W Philbeck; Jessica K Witt
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  A perceiver's own abilities influence perception, even when observing others.

Authors:  Jessica K Witt; Susan C South; Mila Sugovic
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-04

Review 7.  Discovering your inner Gibson: reconciling action-specific and ecological approaches to perception-action.

Authors:  Jessica K Witt; Michael A Riley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-12

8.  Trapped in a tight spot: Scaling effects occur when, according to the action-specific account, they should not, and fail to occur when they should.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Collier; Rebecca Lawson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Does grasping capacity influence object size estimates? It depends on the context.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Collier; Rebecca Lawson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.199

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.