| Literature DB >> 23700503 |
Maria Pietiläinen1, Helena Korpelainen.
Abstract
We investigated patterns of genetic variability in Saxifraga oppositifolia in the isolated Arctic Svalbard archipelago. The genetic analysis included genotyping using nine polymorphic microsatellite markers and sequencing of the nuclear internal transcribed spacer region. Among populations, mean allele numbers per microsatellite locus ranged from 2.0 to 2.6, and 9 % of alleles were unique. Observed (H O) and expected (H E) heterozygosities averaged 0.522 and 0.445, respectively. Typically negative but non-significant F IS values (mean -0.173) were found in S. oppositifolia populations. F ST values were relatively low (mean 0.123). The Bayesian structure analysis provided additional information on population genetic structures. Seven out of 11 studied populations, including populations located both near each other and far apart (distances 5-210 km), showed relatively homogeneous clustering patterns, while one population located on a slope in the main settlement of Longyearbyen possessed a unique genetic structure. The Mantel test proved that there is no significant correlation between genetic and geographical distances. Different growth habits (compact, trailing and intermediate) did not possess distinct genetic compositions based on microsatellite variation. Internal transcribed spacer sequencing revealed 12 polymorphic sites. Among 24 sequenced Svalbard samples, eight haplotypes were detected, none shared by the mainland samples. Population genetic structures of S. oppositifolia in Svalbard show that both genetic variation and differentiation levels are modest, outcrossing is the main mating system, and dispersal and gene flow are important, probably attributable to strong winds and human and animal vectors.Entities:
Keywords: Arctic; ITS sequencing; Saxifraga oppositifolia; microsatellites; population genetic structure
Year: 2013 PMID: 23700503 PMCID: PMC3660837 DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plt024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AoB Plants Impact factor: 3.276
Sampling sites, coordinates and numbers of samples collected from each S. oppositifolia population in Svalbard, studied using microsatellite markers (MS) and ITS sequencing (ITS).
| Population | Locality | Latitude | Longitude | Sample size | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS | ITS | ||||
| BIS | Biscayerhuken | N79°50′18.9″ | E12°23′30.1″ | 20 | 3 |
| FOR | Forkdalen | N79°31′49.8″ | E15°12′33.3″ | 14 | 2 |
| ENG | Engelskbukta 1 | N78°51′16.8″ | E11°43′36.7″ | 24 | 2 |
| ED | Engelskbukta 2 | N78°51′16.0″ | E11°43′42.0″ | 17 | 1 |
| BOH | Bohemanflya | N78°24′22.6″ | E14°41′25.7″ | 29 | 1 |
| LYR | Longyearbyen | N78°14′46.0″ | E15°27′56.0″ | 28 | 5 |
| NYB | Nybyen | N78°12′05.1″ | E15°35′26.9″ | 22 | 0 |
| END | Endalen | N78°11′12.2″ | E15°43′07.1″ | 20 | 1 |
| BRE | Breinnosa | N78°11′01.5″ | E16°43′23.4″ | 21 | 3 |
| KIN | Kinnvika | N80°03′15.2″ | E18°15′10.5″ | 22 | 5 |
| FLO | Florabukta | N80°01′48.5″ | E18°41′33.7″ | 14 | 1 |
Figure 1.The study area of S. oppositifolia in Svalbard. Sampling details are given in Table 1.
Within-population genetic diversity in S. oppositifolia populations in Svalbard based on nine microsatellite markers. A, mean number of alleles per locus; HO, observed heterozygosity over loci; HE, expected heterozygosity over loci; FIS, fixation index over loci.
| Population | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIS | 2.4 | 0.375 | 0.450 | 0.167 |
| FOR | 2.4 | 0.575 | 0.509 | −0.130 |
| ENG | 2.2 | 0.499 | 0.423 | −0.180 |
| ED | 2.2 | 0.534 | 0.458 | −0.166 |
| BOH | 2.6 | 0.488 | 0.391 | −0.248 |
| LYR | 2.3 | 0.460 | 0.375 | −0.227 |
| NYB | 2.0 | 0.550 | 0.403 | −0.365 |
| END | 2.1 | 0.566 | 0.435 | −0.301 |
| BRE | 2.1 | 0.632 | 0.515 | −0.227 |
| KIN | 2.3 | 0.695 | 0.525 | −0.324 |
| FLO | 2.0 | 0.367 | 0.413 | 0.111 |
| Mean | 2.2 ± 0.2 | 0.522 ± 0.099 | 0.445 ± 0.052 | −0.173 |
Figure 2.Assignment of individual samples of S. oppositifolia to five different gene pools as inferred by Bayesian clustering analysis. Results shown (A) for all 11 populations and (B) separately for plants with compact (C), intermediate (I) or trailing (T) growth habit. Population details are given in Table 1 and Fig. 1. The question mark (?) means that growth habit was not recorded.
Figure 3.Haplotype network showing the relationships among 24 ITS sequences from Svalbard (Sv), five ITS sequences from mainland Norway (No) produced in this study and a total of 11 ITS sequences from mainland Norway (No), Austria (Au), Italy (It), Spain (Sp) and the USA (US) available in GenBank. The sizes of the circles and squares are proportional to the numbers of sequences with the same haplotype. Small squares on connecting spans indicate minimum numbers of individual mutations.