BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study investigated the prognostic role of tumor cell expression of erythropoietin (EPO) and its receptor (EPO-R) in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) treated with surgery plus radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The impact of EPO, EPO-R, and 11 additional factors on locoregional control (LRC), metastases-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS) was retrospectively evaluated in 144 patients. Additional factors were age, gender, performance status, preradiotherapy (pre-RT) hemoglobin levels, tumor site, histologic grade, T category, N category, human papillomavirus (HPV) status, extent of resection, and chemotherapy. Univariate analyses were performed with the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test, multivariate analyses with the Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: On multivariate analysis, improved LRC was significantly associated with no EPO expression (risk ratio [RR] 3.72; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.35-15.42; p = 0.008), lower T category (RR 1.60; 95 %CI 1.14-2.32; p = 0.005), and oropharynx or larynx cancer (RR 1.23; 95 %CI 1.02-1.49; p = 0.033). Improved MFS was significantly associated with no EPO expression (RR 5.45; 95 %CI 1.13-97.81; p = 0.031), lower T category (RR 1.66; 95 %CI 1.11-2.65; p = 0.013), lower N category (RR 2.44; 95 %CI 1.04-6.66; p = 0.039), HPV positivity (RR 3.14; 95 %CI not available; p = 0.034), and oropharynx or larynx cancer (RR 1.28; 95 %CI 1.01-1.61; p = 0.041). Improved OS was significantly associated with no EPO expression (RR 4.77; 95 %CI 1.63-20.68; p = 0.003), no EPO-R expression (RR 2.36; 95 %CI 1.22-4.92; p = 0.010), lower T category (RR 1.44; 95 %CI 1.04-2.04; p = 0.027), oropharynx or larynx cancer (RR 1.30; 95 %CI 1.08-1.57; p = 0.007), and pre-RT hemoglobin ≥ 12 g/dl (RR 1.94; 95 %CI 1.03-3.65; p = 0.042). CONCLUSION: EPO expression of tumor cells was an independent prognostic factor for LRC, MFS, and OS. EPO-R expression was an independent prognostic factor for OS.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study investigated the prognostic role of tumor cell expression of erythropoietin (EPO) and its receptor (EPO-R) in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) treated with surgery plus radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The impact of EPO, EPO-R, and 11 additional factors on locoregional control (LRC), metastases-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS) was retrospectively evaluated in 144 patients. Additional factors were age, gender, performance status, preradiotherapy (pre-RT) hemoglobin levels, tumor site, histologic grade, T category, N category, human papillomavirus (HPV) status, extent of resection, and chemotherapy. Univariate analyses were performed with the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test, multivariate analyses with the Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: On multivariate analysis, improved LRC was significantly associated with no EPO expression (risk ratio [RR] 3.72; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.35-15.42; p = 0.008), lower T category (RR 1.60; 95 %CI 1.14-2.32; p = 0.005), and oropharynx or larynx cancer (RR 1.23; 95 %CI 1.02-1.49; p = 0.033). Improved MFS was significantly associated with no EPO expression (RR 5.45; 95 %CI 1.13-97.81; p = 0.031), lower T category (RR 1.66; 95 %CI 1.11-2.65; p = 0.013), lower N category (RR 2.44; 95 %CI 1.04-6.66; p = 0.039), HPV positivity (RR 3.14; 95 %CI not available; p = 0.034), and oropharynx or larynx cancer (RR 1.28; 95 %CI 1.01-1.61; p = 0.041). Improved OS was significantly associated with no EPO expression (RR 4.77; 95 %CI 1.63-20.68; p = 0.003), no EPO-R expression (RR 2.36; 95 %CI 1.22-4.92; p = 0.010), lower T category (RR 1.44; 95 %CI 1.04-2.04; p = 0.027), oropharynx or larynx cancer (RR 1.30; 95 %CI 1.08-1.57; p = 0.007), and pre-RT hemoglobin ≥ 12 g/dl (RR 1.94; 95 %CI 1.03-3.65; p = 0.042). CONCLUSION:EPO expression of tumor cells was an independent prognostic factor for LRC, MFS, and OS. EPO-R expression was an independent prognostic factor for OS.
Authors: Dirk Rades; Cornelia Setter; Olav Dahl; Steven E Schild; Frank Noack Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-06-18 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: A K Due; I R Vogelius; M C Aznar; S M Bentzen; A K Berthelsen; S S Korreman; C A Kristensen; L Specht Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2012-05-13 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: A Becker; P Stadler; R S Lavey; G Hänsgen; T Kuhnt; C Lautenschläger; H J Feldmann; M Molls; J Dunst Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2000-01-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Murat O Arcasoy; Khalid Amin; Shu-Chuan Chou; Zishan A Haroon; Mahesh Varia; James A Raleigh Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-01-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Geza Acs; Paul J Zhang; Cindy M McGrath; Peter Acs; John McBroom; Ahmed Mohyeldin; Suzhen Liu; Huasheng Lu; Ajay Verma Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Tania Romina Stoyanoff; Juan Pablo Rodríguez; Juan Santiago Todaro; Joaquín Diego Espada; Juan Pablo Melana Colavita; Nora Cristina Brandan; Adriana Mónica Torres; María Victoria Aguirre Journal: Tumour Biol Date: 2016-07-28
Authors: Dirk Rades; Stefan Huttenlocher; Nina D Seibold; Maximilian P Gebhard; Christoph Thorns; Katrin Hasselbacher; Barbara Wollenberg; Steven E Schild Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2015-03-06 Impact factor: 4.430