IMPORTANCE: Many site-specific, multivariable risk models for predicting the outcome of musculoskeletal pain problems have been published. The overlapping content in these models suggests a common set of generic indicators suitable for use in primary care. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether a brief set of generic prognostic indicators can predict the outcome of musculoskeletal pain in older patients presenting to general practitioners. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective observational cohort study conducted from September 1, 2006, through March 31, 2007, of consecutive patients 50 years or older presenting with noninflammatory musculoskeletal pain to 1 of the 5 participating general practices in the United Kingdom. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: During consultation, the treating physician assessed and recorded 5 brief generic items (duration of present pain episode, current pain intensity, pain interference with daily activities, presence of multiple-site pain, and ultrashort depression screen) and recorded their overall prognostic judgment. The primary outcome was patient-rated improvement, which was measured 6 months after consultation and cross-validated with repeated measures up to 3 years. RESULTS: A total of 194 (48.1%) of 403 participants were classified as having an unfavorable outcome at 6 months. Inclusion of 3 generic prognostic indicators (duration of present pain episode, pain interference with daily activities, and presence of multiple-site pain) in the prognostic model improved on reliance on physicians' prognostic judgment alone (C statistic = 0.72 vs 0.62; net reclassification index = 0.136; proportion correctly classified = 69%). The improvement in prognostic accuracy was attributable to correcting physicians' tendency toward overoptimistic expectations of outcome. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Three easy-to-obtain pieces of information followed by systematic recording of the general practitioners' prognostic judgment provide a simple generic assessment of prognosis at point of care in older persons presenting with musculoskeletal problems to primary care practices in the United Kingdom. Such an assessment offers a common foundation for investigating the usefulness of prognostic stratification for guiding management in the consultation across a range of common painful conditions.
IMPORTANCE: Many site-specific, multivariable risk models for predicting the outcome of musculoskeletal pain problems have been published. The overlapping content in these models suggests a common set of generic indicators suitable for use in primary care. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether a brief set of generic prognostic indicators can predict the outcome of musculoskeletal pain in older patients presenting to general practitioners. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective observational cohort study conducted from September 1, 2006, through March 31, 2007, of consecutive patients 50 years or older presenting with noninflammatory musculoskeletal pain to 1 of the 5 participating general practices in the United Kingdom. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: During consultation, the treating physician assessed and recorded 5 brief generic items (duration of present pain episode, current pain intensity, pain interference with daily activities, presence of multiple-site pain, and ultrashort depression screen) and recorded their overall prognostic judgment. The primary outcome was patient-rated improvement, which was measured 6 months after consultation and cross-validated with repeated measures up to 3 years. RESULTS: A total of 194 (48.1%) of 403 participants were classified as having an unfavorable outcome at 6 months. Inclusion of 3 generic prognostic indicators (duration of present pain episode, pain interference with daily activities, and presence of multiple-site pain) in the prognostic model improved on reliance on physicians' prognostic judgment alone (C statistic = 0.72 vs 0.62; net reclassification index = 0.136; proportion correctly classified = 69%). The improvement in prognostic accuracy was attributable to correcting physicians' tendency toward overoptimistic expectations of outcome. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Three easy-to-obtain pieces of information followed by systematic recording of the general practitioners' prognostic judgment provide a simple generic assessment of prognosis at point of care in older persons presenting with musculoskeletal problems to primary care practices in the United Kingdom. Such an assessment offers a common foundation for investigating the usefulness of prognostic stratification for guiding management in the consultation across a range of common painful conditions.
Authors: Kyle M Baumbauer; Erin E Young; Angela R Starkweather; Jessica W Guite; Beth S Russell; Renee C B Manworren Journal: Med Clin North Am Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 5.456
Authors: Lene Aasdahl; Fredrik Granviken; Ingebrigt Meisingset; Astrid Woodhouse; Kari Anne I Evensen; Ottar Vasseljen Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2021-05-19 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Laura E Simons; Allison Smith; Camila Ibagon; Rachael Coakley; Deirdre E Logan; Neil Schechter; David Borsook; Jonathan C Hill Journal: Pain Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 7.926
Authors: Eric Bair; Sheila Gaynor; Gary D Slade; Richard Ohrbach; Roger B Fillingim; Joel D Greenspan; Ronald Dubner; Shad B Smith; Luda Diatchenko; William Maixner Journal: Pain Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 7.926
Authors: Michael Von Korff; Lynn L DeBar; Erin E Krebs; Robert D Kerns; Richard A Deyo; Francis J Keefe Journal: Pain Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 7.926
Authors: Gary J Macfarlane; Marcus Beasley; Gordon Prescott; Paul McNamee; Philip Keeley; Majid Artus; John McBeth; Philip Hannaford; Gareth T Jones; Neil Basu; John Norrie; Karina Lovell Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2016-04-26 Impact factor: 2.362