Literature DB >> 23698709

The combination of two Sle2 lupus-susceptibility loci and Cdkn2c deficiency leads to T-cell-mediated pathology in B6.Fas(lpr) mice.

Z Xu1, B P Croker, L Morel.   

Abstract

The NZM2410 Sle2c1 lupus susceptibility locus is responsible for the expansion of the B1a cell compartment, and for the induction of T-cell induced renal and skin pathology on a CD95-deficient (Fas(lpr)) background. We have previously shown that deficiency in the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p18(INK4c) (p18) was responsible for the B1a cell expansion but was not sufficient to account for the pathology in B6.lpr mice. This study was designed to map the additional Sle2c1 loci responsible for autoimmune pathology when co-expressed with CD95 deficiency. The production, fine-mapping and phenotypic characterization of five recombinant intervals indicated that three interacting subloci were responsive for inducting autoimmune pathogenesis in B6.lpr mice. One of these subloci corresponds most likely to p18 deficiency. Another major locus mapping to a 2-Mb region at the telomeric end of Sle2c1 is necessary to both renal and skin pathology. Finally, a third locus centromeric to p18 enhances the severity of lupus nephritis. These results provide new insights into the genetic interactions leading to systemic lupus erythematosus disease presentation, and represent a major step towards the identification of novel susceptibility genes involved in T-cell-mediated organ damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23698709      PMCID: PMC3752316          DOI: 10.1038/gene.2013.28

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Immun        ISSN: 1466-4879            Impact factor:   2.676


INTRODUCTION

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a prototypic autoimmune disease characterized by production of autoantibodies (autoAb)including dsDNA and chromatin, followed by inflammation and damage in multiple organs, such as the kidneys and the skin.[1] In spite of striking advances in the last few years, the identification of lupus-susceptibility genes and their causative variants still constitutes a great challenge, although it represents a critical step to fully understand SLE pathogenesis.[2] Murine models have led to the discovery of a large number of genomic intervals associated with lupus susceptibility or SLE-related phenotypes.[3] Only a few murine candidate genes have been proposed with a reasonable degree of confidence for causative etiology, and they have been implicated either in immune tolerance, autoimmune amplification or end-organ damage.[3] We have identified by linkage analysis three susceptibility loci, Sle1, Sle2 and Sle3, that collectively represent the genomic variants that are necessary and sufficient for lupus-prone NZM2410 mice to develop clinical disease.[4, 5] The autoimmune phenotypes resulting from Sle2 expression on a C57BL/6 (B6) background have been largely linked to B cells.[6-9] A congenic dissection of the Sle2 locus based on the expansion of the peritoneal B1a cell compartment has identified three sub-loci, Sle2a, Sle2b and Sle2c.[10] Sle2a and Sle2b, but not Sle2c mediated autoimmune disease in combination with the Sle1 and Sle3 loci.[10] We have further shown that the lack of contribution of Sle2c to autoimmune pathogenesis was due to the presence of a suppressive locus at the telomeric end of Sle2c, termed Sle2c2.[11] The centromeric portion of Sle2c, Sle2c1, is the strongest contributor to B1a cell expansion.[12] Within the Sle2c1 interval, a polymorphism in the promoter of the Cdkn2c gene results in a 5-fold decreased expression of the cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor P18INK4c (p18).[13] By comparing the phenotypes of B6.Sle2c1 to that of B6.p18 mice, we have shown that p18 deficiency is the principal cause of B1a cell expansion.[14] The Sle2c1 phenotypes are however not limited to B1a cells. Recently, we have bred CD95 deficiency (Fas allele) onto Sle2c1 to characterize its contribution to SLE pathogenesis using a similar strategy as described for Sle1.[15] We found that by 4–6 months of age, Sle2c1.lpr mice showed a significantly enhanced lymphadenopathy as compared to B6.lpr, and developed dermatitis and T-cell mediated glomerulonephritis (GN), a fully novel phenotype for the Sle2 locus. The analysis of B6.p18 mice revealed that p18-deficiency contributed only partially to the autoimmune pathogenesis in Sle2c1.lpr mice.[14] The present study was designed to map which additional loci within Sle2c1 interacted with CD95 deficiency to produce autoimmune pathogenesis. We have produced and fine-mapped five new strains combining CD95 deficiency with Sle2c1 recombinant intervals. A comprehensive phenotypic analysis of these congenic strains indicated that three interacting sub-loci were responsive for inducting autoimmune pathogenesis in B6.lpr mice. One of these sub-loci corresponds most likely to p18-deficiency. Another major locus mapping to a 2 Mb region at the telomeric end of Sle2c1 is necessary to both renal and skin pathology. Finally, a third locus centromeric to p18 enhances the severity of lupus nephritis. These results provide new insights into the genetic interactions leading to SLE disease presentation, and represent a major step towards the identification of novel susceptibility genes involved in T-cell mediated organ damage.

RESULTS

Production and fine-mapping of Sle2c1.lpr recombinant strains

In order to map the phenotypes of the Sle2c1.lpr strain,[12] we have bred the lpr mutation onto three existing Sle2c1 recombinants,[10] Sle1c1.rec1, Sle1c1.rec1a and Sle2c1.rec1b. In addition, we have produced two new recombinants, Sle2c1.rec1c.lpr and Sle2c1.rec1d.lpr, totaling five Sle2c1.lpr sub-strains (Fig. 1). The Sle2c1 interval represents ~ 13 Mb of chromosome 4 NZB-derived genome between D4Mit119 and D4Mit11.[10] We have fine-mapped the five recombinant intervals using all the possible markers that are polymorphic between the NZB and B6 genomes, including microsatellites and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) collected from the Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI) and the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) or identified through our own genomic sequencing (Table 1). Sle2c1.rec1 corresponds to an interval ~ 10 Mb between the rs28166289 and rs27480282 markers. Sle2c1.rec1b and Sle2c1.rec1c correspond to non-overlapping intervals at the proximal and distal ends of Sle2c1.rec1, respectively. The relatively longer Sle2c1.rec1a and Sle2c1.rec1d intervals cover the Sle2c1.rec1b and Sle2c1.rec1c regions, respectively, and share a ~ 5 Mb overlap at the middle of Sle2c1.rec1 that includes the p18 gene. We have therefore produced five overlapping recombinant intervals covering the entire Sle2c1 locus that should allow the genetic analysis of its interaction with CD95 deficiency. The phenotypes of B6.p18, some of which have already been reported,[14] will also be included in the analysis to map which of the Sle2c1.lpr phenotypes map to the Cdkn2c gene itself.
Figure 1

Physical map of the Sle2c1.rec1 locus and its derived sub-loci

The grey rectangles show the NZB homozygous intervals corresponding to Sle21c1.rec1 (rec1) and its derived recombinants, rec1a, rec1b, rec1c and rec1d on the B6 genetic background. The white rectangles indicate the areas of recombination between the two genomes. The fine mapping and boundaries of these intervals were determined using a combination of markers that are polymorphic between the NZB and B6 genomes, including microsatellites as well as SNPs obtained from public databases and our own genomic sequencing, such Novel5. For clarity purposes, only the terminal markers are displayed on the top panel. The entire list of makers used is provided in Table 1. The lower panel reveals the positions of the markers according to Ensembl NCBI m37.

Table 1

Fine mapping to the Sle2c1.rec1 loci

SNPs & markersPosition1rec1rec1arec1brec1crec1d
D4Mit331103575801B2BBBB
rs32095460103755131BBBBB
rs28154332103913531BBBBB
rs33025840104257942BBBBB
rs28166289105596268N3NNBB
rs3664701105891733NNNBB
rs28327171106685675NNNBB
rs32014282107076284NNNBB
rs28162653107669976NNNBB
rs33011000107720590NNNBB
rs28150412108531685NNNBB
rs32270804108549143NNNBB
rs28132605108551173NNNBB
rs28132547108567192NNNBB
p18 promoter109337862NNBBN
rs13477908109908297NNBBN
rs32194443111068240NNBBN
rs47071801111648032NNBBN
novel3112653568NNBBN
novel5113479088NNBBN
D4Mit278114846185NBBNN
rs27495341115561566NBBNN
rs32080914115575513NBBNN
rs4224727115975049NBBNN
rs27480282116237764NBBNN
rs27513842116476573BBBBB
D4Mit37116887379BBBBB

NCBIM37 release

B6 allele

NZB allele

Production of autoAb and lymphoid expansion

We have previously shown that Sle2c1.lpr but not B6.p18 mice produced significantly more anti-dsDNA and anti-chromatin IgG than B6.lpr mice.[12, 14] The recombinant strains map anti-dsDNA IgG production to the Sle2c1.rec1d interval (Fig. 2A). Anti-chromatin IgG was significantly higher in Sle2c1.rec1.lpr than in B6.lpr mice (Fig. 2B). The difference did not reach significance for Sle2c1.rec1d.lpr mice although the trend was in the same direction as for anti-dsDNA. Anti-nuclear IgG production in the rec1a, rec1b and rec1d intervals combined to lpr was similar to B6.lpr.
Figure 2

Sle2c1.rec1.lpr antinuclear autoantibody production and lymphoid expansion map to Sle1c1.rec1d and Sle1c1.rec1a

Serum levels of anti-dsDNA IgG (A) and anti-chromatin IgG (B). Spleen (C) and pooled lymph nodes (D) weight. Results are expressed as units and are relative to a standard curve derived from a serum pool of aged B6.Sle1.Sle2.Sle3 mice. Statistical analysis was performed using Dunn’s multiple comparison tests with B6.lpr values. ***p < 0.001.

Lymphoid expansion, measured as spleen and lymph node weights, was significantly higher in Sle2c1.lpr and B6.p18 than in B6.lpr mice.[12, 14] Larger spleens and lymph nodes were found in Sle2c1.rec1a.lpr and Sle2c1.rec1d.lpr mice (Fig. 2C and D). Similar results were obtained with total splenocyte and lymph node (LN) cell numbers, and affected both B cells and CD3+ T cells (data not shown). These results showed that the rec1d interval is involved in both anti-nuclear Ab production and lymphoid expansion while the rec1a interval and p18-deficiency contribute to lymphoid expansion.

Alterations in T cell subpopulations and activation

Sle2c1 preferentially expanded CD3+ T cells to the expense of B cells, and this phenotype was enhanced in LNs as compared to the spleen.[12] Therefore, we examined the relative proportion of T and B cells in each recombinant interval in these two tissues. The percentage of T cells showed a significant increase in Sle2c1.rec1a.lpr, Sle2c1.rec1d.lpr and Sle2c1.rec1.lpr spleens and LN as compared to B6.lpr (Fig. 3A). In addition, T cell expansion was greater in the LN than spleens of these mice, as illustrated by a 14-fold increase in the average T cell number in the Sle2c1.rec1d.lpr vs. B6.lpr LN as opposed to a 4-fold increase in the spleens from the same strains. As previously reported, the percentage of T cells in B6.p18 was significantly higher than in B6.lpr LN but not spleens.[14] The percentage of T cells in Sle2c1.rec1b.lpr and Sle2c1.rec1c.lpr mice were similar to B6.lpr. The T cell expansion was mirrored by a corresponding decreased percentage of B cells in all concerned strains, including in the B6.p18 spleens (Fig. 3B). These results showed that the preferential T cell expansion that we have reported in Sle2c1.lpr mice maps to the Sle2c1.rec1a and Sle2c1.rec1d intervals, as well as to p18 deficiency.
Figure 3

Sle2c1.rec1.lpr T cell expansion maps to two loci

Percentages of CD3+ T cells (A), CD19+ B cells (B), CD3+ B220+ T cells (C) and DN T cells (D) in spleens (top row) and LNs (bottom row). Statistical analysis was performed using Dunn’s multiple comparison tests with B6.lpr values. In addition, the comparison between rec1 and rec1d are shown in D, ***p < 0.001.

T cell expansion in Sle2c1.lpr mice disproportionally affected CD3+ CD4− CD8− T cells (double negative DN) and CD3+ B220+ T cells,[12], which are greatly expanded by Fas-deficiency.[16, 17] The percentage of CD3+ B220+ and DN T cells was significantly increased in Sle2c1.rec1.lpr, Sle2c1.rec1a.lpr and Sle2c1.rec1d.lpr as compared with B6.lpr spleens and LN (Fig. 3C and D). In addition, the percentage of DN T cells was significantly higher in Sle2c1.rec1c.lpr than in B6.lpr LN, and there was a trend for the percentage of CD3+ B220+ cells in the same strain (two-sided t test: p = 0.023). The percentage of DNT cells was similar in the Sle2c1.rec1.lpr and Sle2c1.rec1a.lpr spleens, but markedly lower than in Sle2c1.rec1d.lpr (Fig. 3D). Finally, the percentages of CD3+B220+ and DN T cells was similar between B6.p18 and Sle2c1.rec1a.lpr mice, except for DN T cells, which were lower in B6.p18 spleens(Fig. 3D). The interaction between Sle2c1 and Fas-deficiency impacted CD4+ T cell functions with an increased percentage ofCD4+CD44+ effector T cells (Teff), and a decreased percentage of CD4+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells (Treg).[12] Therefore, we evaluated changes in effector T cell subsets from the LN of the five recombinant congenic mice.Sle2c1.rec1.lpr, Sle2c1.rec1a.lpr and Sle2c1.rec1d.lpr mice showed a significantly higher percentage of CD69+ activated CD4+ T cells than B6.lpr controls (Fig. 4A). The percentages of activated CD4+ T cells was similar between Sle2c1.rec1.lpr and Sle2c1.rec1a.lpr mice, and significantly lower than in Sle2c1rec1d.lpr mice (Fig. 4A). Similarly, the percentage of Teff was significantly increased in Sle2c1.rec1.lpr, Sle2c1.rec1a.lpr and Sle2c1.rec1d.lpr mice when compared with B6.lpr controls (Fig. 4B). Interestingly, Sle2c1.rec1c.lpr mice also displayed a significantly higher percentage of Teff than B6.lpr mice, but it was lower than in the three other recombinant strains. In contrast, the percentage of Treg was significantly reduced and to the same extent in Sle2c1.rec1.lpr, Sle2c1.rec1a.lpr, Sle2c1.rec1c.lpr and Sle2c1.rec1d.lpr mice as compared with B6.lpr control. In addition, we detected a mild decrease in the percentage of Tregs in Sle2c1.rec1b.lpr mice as compared with B6.lpr (Fig.4C). We confirmed as previously reported,[14] that the percentage of Teff was significantly higher in B6.p18 than in B6.lpr LNs, but there was no difference for Tregs. In addition, we now report that p18 deficiency does not affect CD69 expression on T cells (Fig. 4A). Overall, this data suggest that the expansion of DN and B220+ T cells, as well as that of activated and CD4+ Teff cells mapped to both the Sle2c1.rec1a and Sle2c1.rec1d intervals, but these two intervals were not equivalent. Within Sle2c1.rec1d, Sle2c1.rec1c provided a significant contribution to T cell activation. In addition, there is some evidence that the phenotypes of the Sle2c1.rec1a interval were not completely accounted for by p18-deficiency, with a potential additional locus within Sle2c1.rec1a.
Figure 4

Sle2c1.rec1.lpr T cell effector phenotypes map to two loci

Percentage of CD69+ (A), CD44+ (B) and FoxP3+ (C) CD4+ T cells in the LNs of the indicated strains. Statistical analysis was performed using Dunn’s multiple comparison tests with B6.lpr values. In addition, the comparison between rec1 and rec1d are shown in A, *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

Renal and skin pathology map to the Sle2c1.re1d locus

Proteinuria at 4–6 months of age was negligible (≤ 30 mg/ml) and similar between all congenic lines and B6.lpr controls. Differences were however found in renal pathology scores. The renal pathology of 4–6 month old B6.lpr mice was limited to a mild mesangial expansion.[12, 14] We found significantly increased GN scores in Sle2c1.rec1a.lpr, Sle2c1.rec1d.lpr and Sle2c1.rec1.lpr as compared to B6.lpr mice, and each of these congenic Sle2c1 recombinant strain presented a different renal pathology (Fig. 5A and B). There was no difference in GN scores between Sle2c1.rec1a.lpr and B6.p18.lpr mice. Their pathology was characterized by a mesangial expansion with increased cellularity. Sle2c1.rec1d.lpr mice presented a significantly more severe phenotype than Sle2c1.rec1a.lpr mice, and the type of lesions was qualitatively different with the Sle2c1.rec1d.lpr kidneys being characterized by glomerular cell proliferation as well as cellular infiltrates of a mixed population of lymphocytes and monocytes. Finally, GN scores were equivalent between Sle2c1.rec1.lpr and Sle2c1.rec1d.lpr mice, corresponding to class IV lupus nephritis, and these scores were significantly greater than in Sle2c1.rec1a.lpr mice (Fig. 5B). However, only the whole Sle2c1.rec1 interval conferred a high penetrance of sub-endothelial hyaline glomerular deposits (Fig. 5B), indicating that a predominant role of autoantibodies and immune complexes in these lesions.
Figure 5

p18 deficiency and the rec1d locus contribute to renal pathology in the Sle2c1.rec1.lpr mice

A. Representative PAS-stained kidney sections from B6.lpr, Sle2c1.rec1a.lpr, Sle2c1.rec1d.lpr and Sle2c1.rec1.lpr mice. All images in this figure were photographed at the same magnification (100× oil immersion objective) and maintained through preparation. Therefore the sizes of the glomeruli are representative and are a marker of inflammation. B6.lpr (score Mm2) shows macula densa at 6 o’clock. There is minimal deviation from normal with mild increase in mesangial matrix in a minority of glomeruli. Sle2c1.rec1a.lpr (score Mc4) shows afferent arteriole at 4–5 o’clock, with further increased mesangium and mesangial hypercellularity in a larger percentage of glomeruli. Capillary walls and lumens are generally preserved. Sle2c1.rec1d.lpr (score P global 4) shows stalk region at 4 – 5 o’clock. There is additional hypercellularity with involvement of the capillary walls and lumens. Small lymphocytes (white arrows) are prominent. Sle1c2.rec1.lpr (score Pg4) shows glomerular vascular pole at 10 o’clock. There are many activated cells with large, open, vesicular nuclei. Capillaries are compromised by cells and contain large sub-endothelial immune complex hyaline deposits (wire loops, arrow heads). B. Quantitation of renal pathology scores from at least 15 mice per strain. The pie charts show the distribution (percentages) of renal pathology scores grouped as N (white): negative; M1-2 (blue): mild mesangial expansion; M3-4 (green): severe mesangial expansion; P1-2 (yellow): mild proliferative; P3-4 (red): severe proliferative. The black and white “Hyaline” pie chart shows the percentage of mice presenting with heavy glomerular hyaline deposits for each strain. No incidence of this phenotype was observed in B6.lpr, Sle1c1.rec1a.lpr and B6.p18 mice. Statistical comparisons between strains were performed with two-tailed Fisher exact tests comparing grouped mild GN scores (M1-2 + M3-4 + P1-2) to severe GN scores (P3-4). *p < 0.05, ns: not significant.

We have previously reported that about 20% of Sle2c1.lpr mice develop dermatitis but no skin lesions were observed in either B6.p18 or B6.lpr mice.[12, 14] Dermatitis was observed in some of the recombinant mice, particularly in the Sle2c1rec1d.lpr strain. The mice typically experienced hair loss, skin ulceration and scab formation on the interscapular and neck regions and the ears (Fig. 6A), as described in B6.Sle2c1.lpr mice.[12] The histology assessment of the lesions showed inflammatory cell infiltration, epidermal hyperplasia and ulceration in Sle2c1.rec1d.lpr skins (Fig. 6B). B6.lpr as well as Sle2c1.rec1b.lpr and Sle2c1.rec1c.lpr mice never developed dermatitis (Fig. 6C and data not shown), and showed a normal skin architecture and morphology (Fig. 6B). Among the three other strains, Sle2c1.rec1d.lpr mice showed the highest incidence of dermatitis (39%, 23/59) which was significantly higher than in either Sle2c1.rec1.lpr (12%, 9/85) or Sle2c1.rec1a.lpr (5%, 2/38) mice (Fig. 7C), and was even higher than in Sle2c1.lpr mice (13/56, p = 0.034). The major components of the cellular infiltrates in the skin lesions of Sle2c1.rec1d.lpr mice were CD3+ T cells, the majority of which being DN, and Ly6G+ neutrophils (Fig.6D and E). In addition, the Sle2c1.rec1d.lpr skin lesions contained smaller but significantly higher amounts of DCs (Fig. 6F), CD4+ and CD8+ T cells as compared with B6.lpr.
Figure 6

The rec1d locus contributes to skin pathology

A. Representative Sle1c1.rec1d.lpr mice showing a typical interscapular dermatitis. B. Representative H&E stained interscapular skin sections from an unaffected B6.lpr mouse (top) and from a lesion in a Sle1c1.rec1d.lpr mouse. C. Frequency of dermatitis B6.lpr: N = 50; Sle1c1.rec1a.lpr: N =38; B6.p18 N = 50; Sle1c1.rec1d.lpr: N = 59; and Sle2c1.rec1.lpr: N = 85. Absolute numbers of DN T cells (D), Gr1+ granulocytes (E) and CD11c+ dendritic cells (F) collected from 1 cm2 of interscapular skin from B6.lpr, unaffected (normal) or affected (derm) Sle1c1.rec1d.lpr mice. Statistical comparisons were performed with two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests; **p < 0.01.

These results show that the rec1d interval contains genetic variation supporting the development of T cell driven autoimmune pathology in both the skin and the kidney. The rec1a interval supports only a mild induction of renal pathology in a manner that is consistent with p18-deficiency being the main contributor to the phenotype. There is evidence however of an additional locus in the Sle2c1.rec1a interval that, when co-expressed with the other loci, is required for hyaline deposits in addition to the proliferative GN pathology. This third locus does not seem to be involved in skin pathology, and it may actually be protective.

DISCUSSION

We have previously reported that Sle2 and Sle2c1 expression regulates B cell differentiation and homeostasis.[6, 7, 10] In addition, Sle2c1 greatly enhances the lymphadenopathy and accelerated autoimmune pathology associated with CD95 deficiency.[12] We have showed that p18-deficiency, the genetic variation responsible for the altered B cell homeostasis in Sle2c1, was not sufficient to account for the autoimmune phenotypes of Sle2c1.lpr mice.[14] The current study used five new recombinant intervals within Sle2c1 to map these phenotypes and established the existence of three non-redundant loci. One of these loci interacting with CD95 deficiency is located in the middle of the interval and is likely the Cdkn2c gene, or a gene closely linked to it. The two other ones, a telomeric interval of about 2 Mb and a larger centromeric interval, each enhance the autoimmune phenotype of the Cdkn2c-linked middle locus. The middle locus corresponding to the overlapping region between rec1a and rec1d in the middle of the interval exerted the strongest effects on the development of autoimmune pathology, as shown by several phenotypes. First, the Sle2c1.rec1a.lpr and Sle2c1.rec1d.lpr mice showed a remarkable T cell expansion, reflected by a significant increase in both percentages and absolute numbers in the spleen and LNs as compared to B6.lpr controls. This phenotype suggests that the susceptibility gene in the rec1a/rec1d overlap affects T cell proliferation. Since T cells were also significantly expanded in B6.p18 mice, our results are consistent with the combination of p18 and CD95 deficiencies resulting in the preferential proliferation of T cells. We have also detected a marked decrease in the percentage of B cells in Sle2c1.rec1.lpr, Sle2c1.rec1a.lpr and Sle2c1.rec1d.lpr mice. This raises the question why T cells behave differently from B cells in these strains, with the possibility that the increased in absolute B cell numbers is secondary to the T cell expansion. Second, the presence of the rec1a/rec1d overlap was required for all phenotypes, except for the expansion of DN T cells and Teffs in LN for which Sle2c1.rec1 expression was sufficient. It is well recognized that T cells play a critical role in lupus,[18, 19] The massively expanded T cells, specifically CD3+ B220+ T, DN-T, activated CD4+ T and CD4+ Teff, as well as a striking reduction in percentage of Treg cells in the Sle2c1.rec.lpr congenic lines most likely participate in autoimmune pathogenesis, as T cells represent a large fraction of infiltrates in their kidneys,[12] and skin (this report). Finally, significant enhancement of anti-nuclear autoAb production, severe renal and skin pathology required the combination of the rec1a/rec1d overlap and the Sle2c1.rec1c interval in the Sle2c1.rec1d.lpr mice, in which the incidence of inflammatory dermatitis was close to that reported in the MRL-lpr strain, which is a well-established model of spontaneous autoimmune dermatitis.[20] The large number of neutrophils and T cells found in the skin lesions of the Sle2c1.rec1d.lpr mice is also reminiscent of the findings in the MRL-lpr mice and in human cutaneous.[21, 22] These data are consistent with the majority of the Sle2c1.lpr autoimmune phenotypes result from interactions between p18-deficiency and the Sle2c1.rec1c locus, providing additional evidence for the importance of genetic epistasis in lupus.[23] It is possible that other genes than p18 contained in the rec1a/rec1d overlap are responsible for the Sle2c1.lpr autoimmune phenotypes. The skint gene family, which consists of eleven members, is located in this region, and Skint1 regulates epidermal γδT cell selection,[24, 25] as well as the balance of IFNγ and IL-17 by these cells.[26] The presence of γδT cells in the skin and renal lesions of Sle2c1.rec1d.lpr mice will have to be investigated. The Sle2c1.rec1c locus covers ~ 2 Mbp that is gene-rich with 34 known protein-coding genes. We are currently in the process of screening these genes for coding and expression polymorphisms. Finally, the existence of a susceptibility locus in the Sle2c1.rec1b interval is suggested by the reduction in the number of Tregs in the Sle2c1.rec1b.lpr LNs and by the more severe renal pathology in Sle2.rec1.lpr mice as compared to Sle2.rec1d.lpr mice. The absence of proteinuria is most likely due to the fact that these mice have to euthanized due to lymphadenopathy and eventually dermatitis before clinical consequences of renal pathology can develop. Although both strains present a class IV nephritis, the presence of hyaline wire-loop deposits in Sle2.rec1.lpr kidneys suggest additional factors favoring the formation and/or deposition of large immune complexes. We have not found any differences in cellular phenotypes between Sle2.rec1.lpr and Sle2.rec1d.lpr mice, and it is not clear why the presence of the Sle2c1.rec1b would exacerbate renal pathology but ameliorate skin pathology. A recent study showed that MyD88 signaling in dendritic cells was critical for dermatitis but not nephritis in MRL/lpr mice,[27] clearly indicating a different mechanism for pathology in the two target organs. Sle2c1.rec1b is still a relative large ~ 6 Mbp interval with 43 known protein-coding genes, none of which being an obvious candidate for the reported phenotypes. In summary, we have shown the existence of two loci within Sle2c1 that synergize with p18 deficiency to greatly accelerate T-cell mediated autoimmune kidney and skin pathology in CD95 deficient mice. These two loci are not redundant and differentially affect skin and renal pathology. The identification of these genes within the intervals that we have defined will advance our understanding of the complex genetic architecture of lupus susceptibility.

Materials and methods

Mice

The Sle2c1.lpr and B6.p18 strains have been previously described.[12, 14] The recombinant congenic intervals Sle2c1.rec1, Sle2c1.rec1a and Sle2c1.rec1b, also previously described,[10] were crossed to homozygosity to B6.Fas (B6.lpr), which were originally purchased from the Jackson Laboratory. In addition, two new recombinant strains, Sle2c1.rec1c.lpr and Sle2c1.rec1d.lpr, were produced from Sle2c1.lpr mice by repeated backcrossing with B6.lpr mice and intercrossing to homozygosity. Both males and females were analyzed at 4–6 months of age. Age- and gender-matched B6.lpr mice were used as control. All experiments were conducted according to protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Florida. The p18 promoter SNP has been previously reported.[13] Two novel polymorphic SNPs, Novel3 (NCBI M37 112653568 C/A)and Novel5 (NCBI M37 113479088 C/T) were identified through sequencing of captured target genomic fragments performed at the UF Interdisciplinary Center for Biotechnology Research. Briefly, based on the NCBIM37 mouse genome sequence, probe design and capture array manufacture were performed with Agilent Technologies reagents to target the chr4:108560000-115000000 region. Genomic DNA was prepared from a Sle2c1.rec1d.lpr mouse. 100-800bp DNA fragments were made by shearing and then hybridized with the capture array. After unbound DNA fragments were washed off, the captured DNA fragments were eluted and sequenced by paired-end (2×100) NGS protocol on Illumina HiSeq2000. The raw sequence data was mapped to the reference B6 genome (NCBIM37) to identify SNPs. Fine mapping of the recombinants was performed by PCR for microsatellites markers and direct Sanger sequencing for SNPs.

Autoantibody measurements

Anti-dsDNA and anti-chromatin IgG were measured by ELISA as previously described.[28] Briefly, mBSA-precoated plates were coated overnight with 50 mg/ml dsDNA; with the addition of 10 mg/ml of histone H1, H2A, H2B, H3 and H4 overnight for anti-chromatin IgG measurement. 1:100 diluted test sera were added to the plates and bound autoantibodies were detected using alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG and pNPP substrate. Raw optical densities were converted to units per milliliter, using a standard curve derived from pooled B6.Sle1.Sle2.Sle3 sera, arbitrarily setting the reactivity of a 1:100 dilution of this serum to 100 U/ml.

Flow cytometry

Cell subset distribution and activation in the spleen and LN were determined by flow cytometry as previously described.[12] In brief, single-cell suspensions were prepared by lysing red blood cells with 0.83% NH4Cl. Afterwards, cells were blocked with saturating amounts of anti-CD16/CD32 (2.4G2) and then stained with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies: CD3e (145-2C11), CD4 (RM4-5), CD8a (53–6.7), CD19 (1D3), CD44(1M7), CD69(H1.2F3), B220 (RA3-6B2). Intracellular staining for FoxP3 (FJK-16s) was performed after fixation/permeabilization of cells. All antibodies were purchased from BD PharMingen or eBioscience. At least 30,000events were acquired per sample using a FACSCalibur cytometer (BD Biosciences).

Kidney and skin pathology

Proteinuria was determined with Albustix strips (Bayer). Kidneys from 4–5 month old mice were fixed and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and periodic acid Schiff (PAS). Renal lesions were scored in a blinded manner as previously described.[12] Briefly glomerular lesions were classified as negative (N), mesangial matrix (PAS+ Mm) or mesangial cellularity (Mc) expansion or proliferative glomerulonephritis (glomerular hypercellularity, P). Extent of involvement was graded on a 1-4 scale in both M and P categories. In addition, the presence of heavy hyaline PAS+ deposits was noted. The incidence of dermatitis was recorded during daily checks. Formalin-fixed skin specimens were embedded in paraffin and sections were stained H&E. Quantitative analysis of cellular infiltrates in skin was conducted as described.[29] Briefly, 1 cm2 of skin was excised from the dorsal neck of Sle2c1.rec1d.lpr mice with or without skin lesions and from B6.lpr mice (all without skin lesions). The dermis was separated mechanically from the epidermis and digested with 0.28 U/ml Liberase 3 (Roche) for 20 min at 37°C, passed through a 70-µm filter and washed in serum-free RPMI. The resulting cells were stained with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies against the following lineage markers CD3e (145-2C11), CD4 (RM4-5), CD8a (53–6.7), CD19 (1D3), CD11b(M1/70), CD11c(HL3), CD45(30-F11), F4/80(BM8)and Ly6G (1A8). All samples were analyzed with a FACSCallibur at high speed for one minute in order to get the relative cell number per sample.

Statistical analysis

Data was analyzed with GraphPad Prism 5.0 software with the statistical tests indicated in the text. Non-parametric tests were used when data were not distributed normally. Multiple comparison tests were performed using either Bonferonni or Dunns’ tests. Means, SEM, and the levels of statistical significance are shown in the figures.
  29 in total

1.  Skint1, the prototype of a newly identified immunoglobulin superfamily gene cluster, positively selects epidermal gammadelta T cells.

Authors:  Lynn M Boyden; Julia M Lewis; Susannah D Barbee; Anna Bas; Michael Girardi; Adrian C Hayday; Robert E Tigelaar; Richard P Lifton
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2008-04-13       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  The NZM2410-derived lupus susceptibility locus Sle2c1 increases Th17 polarization and induces nephritis in fas-deficient mice.

Authors:  Zhiwei Xu; Carla M Cuda; Byron P Croker; Laurence Morel
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2011-03

Review 3.  Genetics of SLE: evidence from mouse models.

Authors:  Laurence Morel
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 4.  Animal models of spontaneous and drug-induced cutaneous lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Fukumi Furukawa; Takashi Yoshimasu
Journal:  Autoimmun Rev       Date:  2005-02-17       Impact factor: 9.754

5.  Mechanisms of peritoneal B-1a cells accumulation induced by murine lupus susceptibility locus Sle2.

Authors:  Zhiwei Xu; Edward J Butfiloski; Eric S Sobel; Laurence Morel
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  Genetic dissection of SLE pathogenesis. Sle1 on murine chromosome 1 leads to a selective loss of tolerance to H2A/H2B/DNA subnucleosomes.

Authors:  C Mohan; E Alas; L Morel; P Yang; E K Wakeland
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1998-03-15       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Skint-1 is a highly specific, unique selecting component for epidermal T cells.

Authors:  Susannah D Barbee; Martin J Woodward; Gleb Turchinovich; Jean-Jacques Mention; Julia M Lewis; Lynn M Boyden; Richard P Lifton; Robert Tigelaar; Adrian C Hayday
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Murine models of cutaneous involvement in lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Mehran Ghoreishi; Jan P Dutz
Journal:  Autoimmun Rev       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 9.754

9.  Lupus susceptibility genes may breach tolerance to DNA by impairing receptor editing of nuclear antigen-reactive B cells.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Liunan Li; Kirthi Raman Kumar; Chun Xie; Skip Lightfoot; Xin J Zhou; John F Kearney; Martin Weigert; Chandra Mohan
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2007-07-15       Impact factor: 5.422

10.  Autoimmune skin inflammation is dependent on plasmacytoid dendritic cell activation by nucleic acids via TLR7 and TLR9.

Authors:  Cristiana Guiducci; Claudio Tripodo; Mei Gong; Sabina Sangaletti; Mario P Colombo; Robert L Coffman; Franck J Barrat
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Contribution of B-1a cells to systemic lupus erythematosus in the NZM2410 mouse model.

Authors:  Zhiwei Xu; Laurence Morel
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  A Skint6 allele potentially contributes to mouse lupus.

Authors:  Z Xu; J Xu; J Ju; L Morel
Journal:  Genes Immun       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 2.676

3.  Transplanted human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells facilitate lesion repair in B6.Fas mice.

Authors:  Guang-ping Ruan; Xiang Yao; Shuang-juan Yang; Jin-xiang Wang; Fan Shu; Zi-an Li; Ju-fen Liu; Rong-qing Pang; Xing-hua Pan
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 4.818

4.  A Variant of the Histone-Binding Protein sNASP Contributes to Mouse Lupus.

Authors:  Jiyu Ju; Jia Xu; Yaoqiang Zhu; Xiaoyan Fu; Laurence Morel; Zhiwei Xu
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 7.561

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.