Literature DB >> 23698428

Six red flags for suspect work.

C Glenn Begley1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2013        PMID： 23698428     DOI： 10.1038/497433a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN： 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research.

Authors:  C Glenn Begley; Lee M Ellis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?

Authors:  Florian Prinz; Thomas Schlange; Khusru Asadullah
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Research methods: Know when your numbers are significant.

Authors:  David L Vaux
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 49.962
  3 in total
  46 in total

1.  Are scientists a workforce? - Or, how Dr. Frankenstein made biomedical research sick: A proposed plan to rescue US biomedical research from its current 'malaise' will not be effective as it misdiagnoses the root cause of the disease.

Authors:  Yuri Lazebnik
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Robust research: Institutions must do their part for reproducibility.

Authors:  C Glenn Begley; Alastair M Buchan; Ulrich Dirnagl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Systems biology: perspectives on multiscale modeling in research on endocrine-related cancers.

Authors:  Robert Clarke; John J Tyson; Ming Tan; William T Baumann; Lu Jin; Jianhua Xuan; Yue Wang
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 5.678

4.  Reproducibility: two more red flags for suspect work.

Authors:  Jason E McDermott
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Evaluation of taurine neuroprotection in aged rats with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Raeesa Gupte; Sarah Christian; Paul Keselman; Joshua Habiger; William M Brooks; Janna L Harris
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.978

6.  Reproducibility: changing the policies and culture of cell line authentication.

Authors:  Leonard P Freedman; Mark C Gibson; Stephen P Ethier; Howard R Soule; Richard M Neve; Yvonne A Reid
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  Characterizing scientific failure: Putting the replication crisis in context.

Authors:  Stephan Guttinger; Alan C Love
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 8.807

8.  Practical Computational Reproducibility in the Life Sciences.

Authors:  Björn Grüning; John Chilton; Johannes Köster; Ryan Dale; Nicola Soranzo; Marius van den Beek; Jeremy Goecks; Rolf Backofen; Anton Nekrutenko; James Taylor
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 10.304

Review 9.  Collaboration and competition: ethics in toxicology.

Authors:  Emma S Walker; Ruth A Roberts
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.524

10.  Waste not, want not.

Authors:  Howard A Rockman
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 14.808
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.