Literature DB >> 23697640

The incidental response to uniform natural selection.

Graham Bell1.   

Abstract

When populations are exposed to novel conditions of growth, they often become adapted to a similar extent, and at the same time, evolve some degree of impairment in their original environment. They may also come to vary widely with respect to characters which are uncorrelated with fitness, as the result of chance genetic associations among the founders, when these are a small sample from a large and variable ancestral population. I report an experiment in which 240 replicate lines of the unicellular chlorophyte Chlamydomonas were derived from primarily photoautotrophic ancestors and cultured as heterotrophs in the dark. All adapted to the dark and were impaired in the light after several hundred generations of culture. They also displayed a wide range of colony morphologies that were uncorrelated with fitness. This incidental response to selection probably arose through random variation in the initial composition of the lines. The differences between closely related species or varieties may likewise arise, in similar circumstances, by sampling error rather than natural selection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chlamydomonas; adaptation; genetic drift; indirect response; radiation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23697640      PMCID: PMC3730630          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  5 in total

1.  The effect of neutral nonadditive gene action on the quantitative index of population divergence.

Authors:  Carlos López-Fanjul; Almudena Fernández; Miguel A Toro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Peripatric speciation drives diversification and distributional pattern of reef hermit crabs (Decapoda: Diogenidae: Calcinus).

Authors:  Maria Celia Machel D Malay; Gustav Paulay
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Experimental evolution of heterotrophy in a green alga.

Authors:  Graham Bell
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Selection and covariance.

Authors:  G R Price
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-08-01       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme.

Authors:  S J Gould; R C Lewontin
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1979-09-21
  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Sulfur isotope fractionation during the evolutionary adaptation of a sulfate-reducing bacterium.

Authors:  André Pellerin; Luke Anderson-Trocmé; Lyle G Whyte; Grant M Zane; Judy D Wall; Boswell A Wing
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Laboratory selection quickly erases historical differentiation.

Authors:  Inês Fragata; Pedro Simões; Miguel Lopes-Cunha; Margarida Lima; Bárbara Kellen; Margarida Bárbaro; Josiane Santos; Michael R Rose; Mauro Santos; Margarida Matos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Climate change and habitat fragmentation drive the occurrence of Borrelia burgdorferi, the agent of Lyme disease, at the northeastern limit of its distribution.

Authors:  Julie A Simon; Robby R Marrotte; Nathalie Desrosiers; Jessica Fiset; Jorge Gaitan; Andrew Gonzalez; Jules K Koffi; Francois-Joseph Lapointe; Patrick A Leighton; Lindsay R Lindsay; Travis Logan; Francois Milord; Nicholas H Ogden; Anita Rogic; Emilie Roy-Dufresne; Daniel Suter; Nathalie Tessier; Virginie Millien
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.183

4.  Congruent morphological and genetic differentiation as a signature of range expansion in a fragmented landscape.

Authors:  Ronan Ledevin; Virginie Millien
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 2.912

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.