PURPOSE: To evaluate the intersession repeatability of retinal thickness measurements in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) using the Heidelberg Spectralis optical coherence tomography (OCT) algorithm and a publicly available, three-dimensional graph search-based multilayer OCT segmentation algorithm, the Iowa Reference Algorithm. METHODS: Thirty eyes from 21 patients diagnosed with clinically significant DME were included and underwent consecutive, registered macula-centered spectral-domain optical coherence scans (Heidelberg Spectralis). The OCT scans were segmented into separate surfaces, and the average thickness between internal limiting membrane and outer retinal pigment epithelium complex surfaces was determined using the Iowa Reference Algorithm. Variability between paired scans was analyzed and compared with the retinal thickness obtained from the manufacturer-supplied Spectralis software. RESULTS: The coefficient of repeatability (variation) for central macular thickness using the Iowa Reference Algorithm was 5.26 μm (0.62% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.43-0.71]), while for the Spectralis algorithm this was 6.84 μm (0.81% [95% CI, 0.55-0.92]). When the central 3 mm was analyzed, the coefficient of repeatability (variation) was 2.46 μm (0.31% [95% CI, 0.23-0.38]) for the Iowa Reference Algorithm and 4.23 μm (0.53% [95% CI, 0.39-0.65]) for the Spectralis software. CONCLUSIONS: The Iowa Reference Algorithm and the Spectralis software provide excellent reproducibility between serial scans in patients with clinically significant DME. The publicly available Iowa Reference Algorithm may have lower between-measurement variation than the manufacturer-supplied Spectralis software for the central 3 mm subfield. These findings have significant implications for the management of patients with DME.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the intersession repeatability of retinal thickness measurements in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) using the Heidelberg Spectralis optical coherence tomography (OCT) algorithm and a publicly available, three-dimensional graph search-based multilayer OCT segmentation algorithm, the Iowa Reference Algorithm. METHODS: Thirty eyes from 21 patients diagnosed with clinically significant DME were included and underwent consecutive, registered macula-centered spectral-domain optical coherence scans (Heidelberg Spectralis). The OCT scans were segmented into separate surfaces, and the average thickness between internal limiting membrane and outer retinal pigment epithelium complex surfaces was determined using the Iowa Reference Algorithm. Variability between paired scans was analyzed and compared with the retinal thickness obtained from the manufacturer-supplied Spectralis software. RESULTS: The coefficient of repeatability (variation) for central macular thickness using the Iowa Reference Algorithm was 5.26 μm (0.62% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.43-0.71]), while for the Spectralis algorithm this was 6.84 μm (0.81% [95% CI, 0.55-0.92]). When the central 3 mm was analyzed, the coefficient of repeatability (variation) was 2.46 μm (0.31% [95% CI, 0.23-0.38]) for the Iowa Reference Algorithm and 4.23 μm (0.53% [95% CI, 0.39-0.65]) for the Spectralis software. CONCLUSIONS: The Iowa Reference Algorithm and the Spectralis software provide excellent reproducibility between serial scans in patients with clinically significant DME. The publicly available Iowa Reference Algorithm may have lower between-measurement variation than the manufacturer-supplied Spectralis software for the central 3 mm subfield. These findings have significant implications for the management of patients with DME.
Authors: Daniel F Kiernan; Seenu M Hariprasad; Eric K Chin; Claire L Kiernan; James Rago; William F Mieler Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2008-10-17 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Farzin Forooghian; Catherine Cukras; Catherine B Meyerle; Emily Y Chew; Wai T Wong Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2008-05-30 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Magdalena G Krzystolik; Samara F Strauber; Lloyd Paul Aiello; Roy W Beck; Brian B Berger; Neil M Bressler; David J Browning; Robert B Chambers; Ronald P Danis; Matthew D Davis; Adam R Glassman; Victor H Gonzalez; Paul B Greenberg; Jeffrey G Gross; Judy E Kim; Craig Kollman Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2007-03-13 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Ute E K Wolf-Schnurrbusch; Lala Ceklic; Christian K Brinkmann; Milko E Iliev; Manuel Frey; Simon P Rothenbuehler; Volker Enzmann; Sebastian Wolf Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2009-02-21 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Mona K Garvin; Michael D Abramoff; Randy Kardon; Stephen R Russell; Xiaodong Wu; Milan Sonka Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: John E Legarreta; Giovanni Gregori; Omar S Punjabi; Robert W Knighton; Geeta A Lalwani; Carmen A Puliafito Journal: Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Date: 2008 Jul-Aug
Authors: M R Hee; C A Puliafito; C Wong; J S Duker; E Reichel; B Rutledge; J S Schuman; E A Swanson; J G Fujimoto Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 1995-08
Authors: Stephanie J Chiu; Michael J Allingham; Priyatham S Mettu; Scott W Cousins; Joseph A Izatt; Sina Farsiu Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2015-03-09 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Susan B Bressler; Allison R Edwards; Kakarla V Chalam; Neil M Bressler; Adam R Glassman; Glenn J Jaffe; Michele Melia; David D Saggau; Oren Z Plous Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Louise Terry; Nicola Cassels; Kelly Lu; Jennifer H Acton; Tom H Margrain; Rachel V North; James Fergusson; Nick White; Ashley Wood Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-09-02 Impact factor: 3.240