Literature DB >> 23696424

Association between operative approach and complications in patients undergoing Hartmann's reversal.

C Cellini1, A-P Deeb, A Sharma, J R T Monson, F J Fleming.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Complications following reversal of Hartmann's procedure are common, with morbidity rates of up to 50 per cent, and a mortality rate as high as 10 per cent. This is based on case series with heterogeneous data collection and analysis. This study determined risk factors for complications following Hartmann's reversal.
METHODS: Patients who underwent elective open and laparoscopic Hartmann's reversal were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2005-2010). The programme collects patient demographics, preoperative medical history, clinical findings and laboratory investigations. Postdischarge data were obtained by a certified reviewer. Complications were categorized as major, septic or incisional. Risk-adjusted 30-day outcomes were assessed by univariable and multivariable analyses, adjusting for patient characteristics, co-morbidity and operative approach.
RESULTS: During the study period 7996 patients had a Hartmann's procedure and 2567 cases of Hartmann's reversal were identified, including 336 laparoscopic procedures (13·1 per cent). Major, septic and incisional complication rates were 13·3, 8·5 and 15·7 per cent respectively, with a mortality rate of 0·5 per cent. A laparoscopic approach was found to be independently associated with fewer major (odds ratio (OR) 0·53, 95 per cent confidence interval 0·34 to 0·81), septic (OR 0·48, 0·27 to 0·83) and incisional (OR 0·54, 0·37 to 0·80) complications. A history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 1·78-2·00), steroid use (OR 1·75), body mass index at least 30 kg/m² (OR 1·48), diabetes (OR 1·40), smoking (OR 1·33-1·40), American Society of Anesthesiologists fitness grade III and IV (OR 1·46-1·48) and prolonged operating time (OR 1·02) were other factors associated with complications.
CONCLUSION: A laparoscopic approach to Hartmann's reversal was associated with fewer complications than open surgery in this highly selected group of patients.
© 2013 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23696424     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  13 in total

1.  Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's procedure.

Authors:  Valentino Fiscon; Giuseppe Portale; Antonio Mazzeo; Giovanni Migliorini; Flavio Frigo
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2014-09-28

Review 2.  Efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted approach for reversal of Hartmann's procedure: results from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database.

Authors:  Jeanine Arkenbosch; Hiromichi Miyagaki; H M C Shantha Kumara; Xiaohong Yan; Vesna Cekic; Richard L Whelan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Conventional Versus Minimally Invasive Hartmann Takedown: A Meta-analysis of the Literature.

Authors:  Francesco Guerra; Diego Coletta; Celeste Del Basso; Giuseppe Giuliani; Alberto Patriti
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Reversal of Hartmann's procedure: still a complicated operation.

Authors:  N Horesh; Y Rudnicki; Y Dreznik; A P Zbar; M Gutman; O Zmora; D Rosin
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Comparison between laparoscopic and open Hartmann's reversal: results of a decade-long multicenter retrospective study.

Authors:  Nir Horesh; Yonatan Lessing; Yaron Rudnicki; Ilan Kent; Haguy Kammar; Almog Ben-Yaacov; Yael Dreznik; Shmuel Avital; Eli Mavor; Nir Wasserberg; Hanoch Kashtan; Joseph Klausner; Mordechai Gutman; Oded Zmora; Hagit Tulchinsky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Is laparoscopy a reliable alternative to laparotomy in Hartmann's reversal? An updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  D Chavrier; A Alves; B Menahem
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  Assessing trends in laparoscopic colostomy reversal and evaluating outcomes when compared to open procedures.

Authors:  Kevin Y Pei; Kimberly A Davis; Yawei Zhang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Hartmann's procedure, reversal and rate of stoma-free survival.

Authors:  S Hallam; B S Mothe; Rmr Tirumulaju
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  A retrospective case note review of laparoscopic versus open reversal of Hartmann's procedure.

Authors:  C L Walklett; N P Yeomans
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  COLOSTOMY CLOSURE: RISK FACTORS FOR COMPLICATIONS.

Authors:  Alexandre Z Fonseca; Edson Uramoto; Otto M Santos-Rosa; Stephanie Santin; Marcelo Ribeiro
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.