Literature DB >> 23696202

Females scan more than males: a potential mechanism for sex differences in recognition memory.

Jennifer J Heisz1, Molly M Pottruff, David I Shore.   

Abstract

Recognition-memory tests reveal individual differences in episodic memory; however, by themselves, these tests provide little information regarding the stage (or stages) in memory processing at which differences are manifested. We used eye-tracking technology, together with a recognition paradigm, to achieve a more detailed analysis of visual processing during encoding and retrieval. Although this approach may be useful for assessing differences in memory across many different populations, we focused on sex differences in face memory. Females outperformed males on recognition-memory tests, and this advantage was directly related to females' scanning behavior at encoding. Moreover, additional exposures to the faces reduced sex differences in face recognition, which suggests that males may be able to improve their recognition memory by extracting more information at encoding through increased scanning. A strategy of increased scanning at encoding may prove to be a simple way to enhance memory performance in other populations with memory impairment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  eye movements; face perception; faces; individual differences; memory; recognition; sex differences

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23696202     DOI: 10.1177/0956797612468281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  11 in total

1.  Always on My Mind? Recognition of Attractive Faces May Not Depend on Attention.

Authors:  André Silva; António F Macedo; Pedro B Albuquerque; Joana Arantes
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-29

2.  Perception and recognition of faces in adolescence.

Authors:  D Fuhrmann; L J Knoll; A L Sakhardande; M Speekenbrink; K C Kadosh; S-J Blakemore
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Sex-specific relationships between face memory and the N170 component in event-related potentials.

Authors:  Hadiseh Nowparast Rostami; Andrea Hildebrandt; Werner Sommer
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Exercise Similarly Facilitates Men and Women's Selective Attention Task Response Times but Differentially Affects Memory Task Performance.

Authors:  Matt Coleman; Kelsey Offen; Julie Markant
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-08-13

Review 5.  The Role of Sex in Memory Function: Considerations and Recommendations in the Context of Exercise.

Authors:  Paul D Loprinzi; Emily Frith
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Eye tracker as an implied social presence: awareness of being eye-tracked induces social-norm-based looking behaviour.

Authors:  Hoo Keat Wong; Ian D Stephen
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 0.957

7.  Bayesian regression-based developmental norms for the Benton Facial Recognition Test in males and females.

Authors:  Leah A L Wang; John D Herrington; Birkan Tunç; Robert T Schultz
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-08

8.  Visual Exploration at Higher Fixation Frequency Increases Subsequent Memory Recall.

Authors:  Bernhard Fehlmann; David Coynel; Nathalie Schicktanz; Annette Milnik; Leo Gschwind; Pascal Hofmann; Andreas Papassotiropoulos; Dominique J-F de Quervain
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2020-07-21

9.  Gender differences in crowd perception.

Authors:  Yang Bai; Allison Y Leib; Amrita M Puri; David Whitney; Kaiping Peng
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-02

10.  Gender Classification Based on Eye Movements: A Processing Effect During Passive Face Viewing.

Authors:  Negar Sammaknejad; Hamidreza Pouretemad; Changiz Eslahchi; Alireza Salahirad; Ashkan Alinejad
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2017-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.