Literature DB >> 23696185

Flexible pes planus in adolescents: body mass index, body height, and gender--an epidemiological study.

Shay Tenenbaum1, Oded Hershkovich, Barak Gordon, Nathan Bruck, Ran Thein, Estela Derazne, Dorit Tzur, Ari Shamiss, Arnon Afek.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most studies on the prevalence of flexible pes planus (FPP) have been conducted in pediatric populations and older adults. There is limited comparable information on these parameters for the adolescent age group. The purpose of this study was to report the prevalence of FPP and its association with body mass index (BMI), body height, and gender among healthy and fit adolescents.
METHODS: The data for this study were derived from a medical database containing records of 17-year-old males and females before their recruitment into mandatory military service. Information on the disability codes associated with FPP according to the Regulations of Medical Fitness Determination was retrieved. Logistic regression models were used to assess the association between BMI, body height, and gender to various grades of FPP severity.
RESULTS: The study cohort included 825 964 adolescents (467 412 males and 358 552 females). The prevalence was 12.4% for mild FPP and 3.8% for severe FPP among the males and 9.3% and 2.4%, respectively, for the females. An increased BMI was associated with FPP in both males (overweight: odds ratio [OR] 1.385, confidence interval [CI] 1.352-1.419, P < .001; obese: OR 1.765, CI 1.718-1.813, P < .001) and females (overweight: OR 1.408, CI 1.365-1.620, P < .001; obese: OR 1.549, CI 1.481-1.620, P < .001). Body height was associated with a decreased risk of FPP when the highest height quintile was compared with the lowest height quintile in both males (OR 0.782, CI 0.762-0.802, P < .001) and females (OR 0.730, CI 0.707-0.754, P < .001) for all FPP severity grades.
CONCLUSIONS: There was a greater prevalence of FPP among males compared with females in a general healthy adolescent age group. FPP was associated with increased BMI and shorter body height for all grades of FPP severity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, diagnostic study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  body mass index; flatfoot; flexible pes planus; height

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23696185     DOI: 10.1177/1071100712472327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  13 in total

Review 1.  Pes planus and paediatric obesity: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  S Stolzman; M B Irby; A B Callahan; J A Skelton
Journal:  Clin Obes       Date:  2015-03-23

Review 2.  Paediatric flexible flat foot: how are we measuring it and are we getting it right? A systematic review.

Authors:  Helen A Banwell; Maisie E Paris; Shylie Mackintosh; Cylie M Williams
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 3.  [Etiology, pathogenesis, clinical features, diagnostics and conservative treatment of adult flatfoot].

Authors:  N Gutteck; S Schilde; K S Delank; D Arbab
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Validity of footprint analysis to determine flatfoot using clinical diagnosis as the gold standard in a random sample aged 40 years and older.

Authors:  Salvador Pita-Fernández; Cristina González-Martín; Teresa Seoane-Pillado; Beatriz López-Calviño; Sonia Pértega-Díaz; Vicente Gil-Guillén
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 3.211

5.  Children with flat feet have weaker toe grip strength than those having a normal arch.

Authors:  Yuto Tashiro; Takahiko Fukumoto; Daisuke Uritani; Daisuke Matsumoto; Shu Nishiguchi; Naoto Fukutani; Daiki Adachi; Takayuki Hotta; Saori Morino; Hidehiko Shirooka; Yuma Nozaki; Hinako Hirata; Moe Yamaguchi; Tomoki Aoyama
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-11-30

6.  Adolescent BMI at Northern Israel: From Trends, to Associated Variables and Comorbidities, and to Medical Signatures.

Authors:  Yossy Machluf; Daniel Fink; Rivka Farkash; Ron Rotkopf; Avinoam Pirogovsky; Orna Tal; Tamar Shohat; Giora Weisz; Erez Ringler; David Dagan; Yoram Chaiter
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Can an insole for obese individuals maintain the arch of the foot against repeated hyper loading?

Authors:  Yuki Saito; Takako S Chikenji; Yuichi Takata; Tomoaki Kamiya; Eiichi Uchiyama
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  A systematic review and meta-analysis estimating the population prevalence of comorbidities in children and adolescents aged 5 to 18 years.

Authors:  Vishal Sharma; Susanne Coleman; Jane Nixon; Linda Sharples; Julian Hamilton-Shield; Harry Rutter; Maria Bryant
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 9.213

9.  The relationship between paediatric foot posture and body mass index: do heavier children really have flatter feet?

Authors:  Angela Margaret Evans; Leila Karimi
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 10.  The effectiveness of non-surgical intervention (Foot Orthoses) for paediatric flexible pes planus: A systematic review: Update.

Authors:  Sindhrani Dars; Hayley Uden; Helen A Banwell; Saravana Kumar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.