Literature DB >> 23695431

Value of ultrasound for postoperative surveillance of asian patients with history of breast cancer surgery: a single-center study.

Young Joo Suh1, Min Jung Kim, Eun-Kyung Kim, Hee Jung Moon, Seung-Il Kim, Byeong-Woo Park.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic performance of postoperative ultrasound (US) surveillance for the detection of malignant lesions and to evaluate the clinical role of US in the postoperative surveillance of patients with breast cancer history.
METHODS: We studied a total of 390 patients who underwent surgery for breast cancer between January 2000 and December 2002, 286 mastectomy patients, 103 breast conservation surgery (BCS) patients, and one with both mastectomy and BCS. A total of 4,081 US examinations by December 2010 were reviewed. The final diagnosis for final-positive lesions was based on cytopathology results, clinical follow-up, and imaging studies. Diagnostic performances for detecting final-positive lesions were assessed. We also compared the frequency of distant metastases in patients with final-positive findings and those without. The overall survival was estimated.
RESULTS: Among 2,925 examinations in 287 patients with mastectomy, there were 85 US-positive and 23 final-positive lesions (27 %) in 20 patients at final diagnosis. Among 1,171 examinations in 104 BCS patients, there were 32 US-positive and five final-positive (15.6 %) findings in four patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and accuracy of US for final-positive lesions after breast cancer surgery were 95.8,97.8, 27.1, and 97.9 % in mastectomy patients and 42.9, 97.5, 9.4, and 97.2 % in BCS patients. Among mastectomy patients, patients with final-positive findings had a higher incidence of distant metastasis than patients without final-positive findings (31.6 vs. 9.3 %, p = 0.01). Among BCS patients, there was no distant metastasis. Among mastectomy patients, the overall survival was not significantly different between patients with only final-positive findings and in patients with final-positive findings and distant metastasis (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative US had a high sensitivity for the detection of malignant lesions in the breast and the regional area, which can be a predictor of distant metastasis in mastectomy patients; however, the role of postoperative US in the detection of malignant lesions in BCS patients is unclear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23695431     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3020-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  6 in total

Review 1.  Imaging surveillance of patients with breast cancer after primary treatment: current recommendations.

Authors:  Jung Hyun Yoon; Min Jung Kim; Eun-Kyung Kim; Hee Jung Moon
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.500

2.  Breast magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women with a personal history of breast cancer: outcomes stratified by interval between definitive surgery and surveillance MR imaging.

Authors:  Vivian Youngjean Park; Eun-Kyung Kim; Min Jung Kim; Hee Jung Moon; Jung Hyun Yoon
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Screening women with a personal history of breast cancer: overview of the evidence on breast imaging surveillance.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Nariya Cho
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2018-06-07

4.  The Usefulness of Ultrasound Surveillance for Axillary Recurrence in Women With Personal History of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Sung Ui Shin; Jung Min Chang; Jiwon Park; Han-Byoel Lee; Wonshik Han; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 3.588

5.  Ultrasound for postoperative surveillance after mastectomy in patients with breast cancer: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Yu-Qing Liu; Jia-Nan Dong; Qing-Xin Meng; Ping Sun; Jing Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Breast ultrasound in breast cancer surveillance; incremental cancers found at what cost?

Authors:  Luke Bromley; Jennifer Xu; Su-Wen Loh; Grace Chew; Eddie Lau; Belinda Yeo
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 4.380

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.