Literature DB >> 23694881

Population-based epidemiology of femur shaft fractures.

Natalie Enninghorst1, Debra McDougall, Julie A Evans, Krisztian Sisak, Zsolt J Balogh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The management of patients with femoral shaft fractures (FSFs) is often a decision making dilemma (damage-control orthopedics vs. early total care), with equivocal evidence. The comprehensive, population-based epidemiology of patients with FSF is unknown. The purpose of this prospective study was to describe the epidemiology of patients with FSF, with special focus on patient physiology and timing of surgery.
METHODS: A 12-month prospective population-based study was performed on consecutive patients with FSF in an area with 850,000 population including all ages and prehospital deaths. Patient demographics, mechanism, Injury Severity Score (ISS), shock parameters (systolic blood pressure, base deficit and lactate), transfusion requirement, fracture type [Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification (OA/OTA)], comorbidities, procedures, and outcomes were recorded. Patients hemodynamic status was described as stable, borderline, unstable, and "in extremis."
RESULTS: A total of 126 patients (21 per 100,000 per year) with 136 femur fractures (62% male; age, 38 [28] years; ISS, 20 [19]; 51% multiple injuries) were identified in the region. Sixty patients (48.4%) sustained a high-energy injury with 19 (31.1%) of these being polytrauma patients (ISS, 28 [12]; systolic blood pressure, 98 [39]; base deficit, 6.5 [5.8]; lactate 4 [2]).Fifteen polytrauma patients (94%) required massive transfusion (12 [12] U of packed red blood cells, 8 [5] fresh frozen plasma, 1 [0.4] platelet, 13 [8] cryoprecipitate). Twenty-one patients (16.7%) died at the prehospital setting (3.5 per 100,000 per year). From the 105 hospital admissions, 68.3% was stable (14.3 per 100,000 per year), 8.7% was borderline (1.8 per 100,000 per year), 4.0% was unstable (0.8 per 100,000 per year) and 2.4% (0.5 per 100,000 per year) was in extremis. Six patients (5.7%) died. The length of stay (LOS) was 18 (15) days, and the intensive care unit LOS was 5 (6) days. Fourty-five patients sustained a low-energy injury that had in 85% of cases multiple comorbidities. Eight low-energy patients needed 3 (1) transfusions, and none of the patients died. The LOS was 15 (11) days.
CONCLUSION: Patients with low-energy FSF have a hospital admission rate similar to the patients with high-energy FSF. Sixty-eight percent of patients with FSF are complicated (open, compromised physiology, multiple injuries, bilateral, elderly with comorbidities, etc.), requiring major resources and highly specialized care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiology study, level III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23694881     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31828c3dc9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg        ISSN: 2163-0755            Impact factor:   3.313


  16 in total

1.  In-hospital mortality from femoral shaft fracture depends on the initial delay to fracture fixation and Injury Severity Score: a retrospective cohort study from the NTDB 2002-2006.

Authors:  Robert Victor Cantu; Sara Catherine Graves; Kevin F Spratt
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.313

2.  Decreased muscle strength is associated with impaired long-term functional outcome after intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fracture.

Authors:  P Larsen; R Elsoe; T Graven-Nielsen; U Laessoe; S Rasmussen
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  Intramedullary nailing of concurrent ipsilateral fractures of the tibia and femur: primary synchronous nailing versus staged osteosynthesis with temporizing external fixation.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Engorn; Bradley J Vivace; David Seligson; Travis Parkulo; Derek D Arrington; Salwa F Rashid; Craig Roberts; Rodolfo Zamora
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-08-06

4.  Comparison of outcome of femoral shaft fracture fixation with intramedullary nail in elderly patient and patients younger than 60 years old.

Authors:  Asghar Elmi; Ali Reza Rohani; Ali Tabrizi; Seyed-Masood Esmaili
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2014-06-15

Review 5.  The Burden of High-Energy Musculoskeletal Trauma in High-Income Countries.

Authors:  P Hoogervorst; D W Shearer; T Miclau
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Epidemiology and mortality of pelvic and femur fractures-a nationwide register study of 417,840 fractures in Sweden across 16 years: diverging trends for potentially lethal fractures.

Authors:  Natalie Lundin; Tuomas T Huttunen; Anders Enocson; Alejandro I Marcano; Li Felländer-Tsai; Hans E Berg
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Total knee arthroplasty in patients with extra-articular deformity.

Authors:  Kaushik Hazratwala; Brent Matthews; Matthew Wilkinson; Sergio Barroso-Rosa
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2016-01-12

8.  Early and late intramedullary nailing of femur fracture: A single center experience.

Authors:  Ahmad S Alobaidi; Ammar Al-Hassani; Ayman El-Menyar; Husham Abdelrahman; Mazin Tuma; Hassan Al-Thani; Mohammed A Aldosari
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

9.  The risk of non-union per fracture: current myths and revised figures from a population of over 4 million adults.

Authors:  Leanora A Mills; Stuart A Aitken; A Hamish R W Simpson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Unusual Foreign Bone Fragment in Femoral Open Fracture.

Authors:  Hanon Sadoni; Hamidreza Arti
Journal:  Trauma Mon       Date:  2016-02-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.