Literature DB >> 23692074

Retrospective analysis of Salmonella, Campylobacter, Escherichia coli, and Enterococcus in animal feed ingredients.

Beilei Ge1, Patricia C LaFon, Peggy J Carter, Shawn D McDermott, Jason Abbott, Althea Glenn, Sherry L Ayers, Sharon L Friedman, Joseph C Paige, David D Wagner, Shaohua Zhao, Patrick F McDermott, Mark A Rasmussen.   

Abstract

The presence and antimicrobial susceptibility of foodborne pathogens and indicator organisms in animal feed are not well understood. In this study, a total of 201 feed ingredient samples (animal byproducts, n=122; plant byproducts, n=79) were collected in 2002 and 2003 from representative rendering plants and the oilseed (or cereal grain) industry across the United States. The occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of four bacterial genera (Salmonella, Campylobacter, Escherichia coli, and Enterococcus) were determined. Salmonella isolates were further characterized by serotyping and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). None of the samples yielded Campylobacter or E. coli O157:H7, whereas Salmonella, generic E. coli, and Enterococcus were present in 22.9%, 39.3%, and 86.6% of samples, respectively. A large percentage (47.8%) of Salmonella-positive samples harbored two serovars, and the vast majority (88.4%) of Enterococcus isolates were E. faecium. Animal byproducts had a significantly higher Salmonella contamination rate (34.4%) than plant byproducts (5.1%) (p<0.05). Among 74 Salmonella isolates recovered, 27 serovars and 55 PFGE patterns were identified; all were pan-susceptible to 17 antimicrobials tested. E. coli isolates (n=131) demonstrated similar susceptibility to these antimicrobials except for tetracycline (15.3% resistance), sulfamethoxazole (7.6%), streptomycin (4.6%), ampicillin (3.8%), and nalidixic acid (1.5%). Enterococcus isolates (n=362) were also resistant to five of 17 antimicrobials tested, ranging from 1.1% to penicillin to 14.6% to tetracycline. Resistance rates were generally higher among isolates recovered from animal byproducts. Taken together, our findings suggest that diverse populations of Salmonella, E. coli, and Enterococcus are commonly present in animal feed ingredients, but antimicrobial resistance is not common. Future large-scale studies to monitor these pathogenic and indicator organisms in feed commodities is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23692074     DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2012.1470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis        ISSN: 1535-3141            Impact factor:   3.171


  6 in total

1.  Quantitative Risk Assessment for the Introduction of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) into Dutch Livestock Farms.

Authors:  Natcha Dankittipong; Egil A J Fischer; Manon Swanenburg; Jaap A Wagenaar; Arjan J Stegeman; Clazien J de Vos
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-21

Review 2.  Application of microbial analyses to feeds and potential implications for poultry nutrition.

Authors:  Elena G Olson; Dana K Dittoe; Joshua A Jendza; David A Stock; Steven C Ricke
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 4.014

3.  Investigations into Salmonella Contamination in Feed Mills Producing Rations for the Broiler Industry in Great Britain.

Authors:  Rebecca Gosling; Claire Oastler; Christopher Nichols; George Jackson; Andrew D Wales; Robert H Davies
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2022-06-21

4.  Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles in Enterococcus spp. Isolates From Fecal Samples of Wild and Captive Black Capuchin Monkeys (Sapajus nigritus) in South Brazil.

Authors:  Tiela Trapp Grassotti; Dejoara de Angelis Zvoboda; Letícia da Fontoura Xavier Costa; Alberto Jorge Gomes de Araújo; Rebeca Inhoque Pereira; Renata Oliveira Soares; Paulo Guilherme Carniel Wagner; Jeverson Frazzon; Ana Paula Guedes Frazzon
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella is detected more frequently in feed milling equipment than in raw feed components or processed animal feed.

Authors:  E M Parker; M Valcanis; L J Edwards; P Andersson; D F Mollenkopf; T E Wittum
Journal:  Aust Vet J       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 1.343

6.  Role played by the environment in the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) through the food chain.

Authors:  Konstantinos Koutsoumanis; Ana Allende; Avelino Álvarez-Ordóñez; Declan Bolton; Sara Bover-Cid; Marianne Chemaly; Robert Davies; Alessandra De Cesare; Lieve Herman; Friederike Hilbert; Roland Lindqvist; Maarten Nauta; Giuseppe Ru; Marion Simmons; Panagiotis Skandamis; Elisabetta Suffredini; Héctor Argüello; Thomas Berendonk; Lina Maria Cavaco; William Gaze; Heike Schmitt; Ed Topp; Beatriz Guerra; Ernesto Liébana; Pietro Stella; Luisa Peixe
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-06-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.