Literature DB >> 23692021

Contrasts in livelihoods and protein intake between commercial and subsistence bushmeat hunters in two villages on Bioko Island, Equatorial Guinea.

María Grande Vega1, Bruno Carpinetti, Jesús Duarte, John E Fa.   

Abstract

Across West and Central Africa, wildlife provides a source of food and income. We investigated the relation between bushmeat hunting and household wealth and protein consumption in 2 rural communities in Bioko Island, Equatorial Guinea. One village was dedicated to commercial hunting, the other trapped game primarily for food. We tested whether commercial-hunter households were nutritionally advantaged over subsistence-hunter households due to their higher income from the bushmeat trade and greater access to wild-animal protein. We conducted bushmeat-offtake surveys in both villages (captures by hunters and carcasses arriving to each village). Mammals (including threatened primates: black colobus [Colobus satanas], Preussi's guenon [Allochrocebus preussi], and russet-eared guenon [Cercopithecus erythrotis]), birds, and reptiles were hunted. The blue duiker (Philantomba monticola), giant pouched rat (Cricetomys emini), and brush-tailed porcupine (Atherurus africanus) contributed almost all the animal biomass hunted, consumed, or sold in both villages. Monkeys and Ogilbyi's duikers (Cephalophus ogilbyi) were hunted only by commercial hunters. Commercial hunters generated a mean of US$2000/year from bushmeat sales. Households with commercial hunters were on average wealthier, generated more income, spent more money on nonessential goods, and bought more products they did not grow. By contrast, households with subsistence hunters spent less on market items, spent more on essential products, and grew more of their own food. Despite these differences, average consumption of vegetable protein and domestic meat and bushmeat protein did not differ between villages. Our results highlight the importance of understanding the socioeconomic and nutritional context of commercial and subsistence bushmeat hunting to correctly interpret ways of reducing their effects on threatened species and to enable the sustainable offtake of more productive taxa.
© 2013 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23692021     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  4 in total

1.  Eating Bushmeat Improves Food Security in a Biodiversity and Infectious Disease "Hotspot".

Authors:  Sagan Friant; Wilfred A Ayambem; Alobi O Alobi; Nzube M Ifebueme; Oshama M Otukpa; David A Ogar; Clement B I Alawa; Tony L Goldberg; Jerry K Jacka; Jessica M Rothman
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 4.464

2.  Measuring local depletion of terrestrial game vertebrates by central-place hunters in rural Amazonia.

Authors:  Mark I Abrahams; Carlos A Peres; Hugo C M Costa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Long-Term Urban Market Dynamics Reveal Increased Bushmeat Carcass Volume despite Economic Growth and Proactive Environmental Legislation on Bioko Island, Equatorial Guinea.

Authors:  Drew T Cronin; Stephen Woloszynek; Wayne A Morra; Shaya Honarvar; Joshua M Linder; Mary Katherine Gonder; Michael P O'Connor; Gail W Hearn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Toward a new understanding of the links between poverty and illegal wildlife hunting.

Authors:  Rosaleen Duffy; Freya A V St John; Bram Büscher; Dan Brockington
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 6.560

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.