Literature DB >> 23691991

Mutation location effect on severity of phenotype during exercise testing in type 1 long-QT syndrome: impact of transmembrane and C-loop location.

Zachary W M Laksman1, Robert M Hamilton, Priya Chockalingam, Emily Ballantyne, Elizabeth A Stephenson, Gil J Gross, Lorne J Gula, George J Klein, Arthur A M Wilde, Andrew D Krahn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Targeted mutation site-specific differences have correlated C-loop missense mutations with worse outcomes and increased benefit of beta-blockers in LQT1. This observation has implicated the C-loop region as being mechanistically important in the altered response to sympathetic stimulation known to put patients with LQT1 at risk of syncope and sudden cardiac death.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine if there is mutation site-specific response to sympathetic stimulation and beta-blockers using exercise testing.
METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of LQT1 patients undergoing exercise testing at 3 academic referral centers.
RESULTS: A total of 123 patients (age 28 ± 17 years, 59 male) were studied including 34 patients (28%) with C-loop mutations. There were no significant differences in supine, standing, peak exercise and 1-minute recovery QTc duration between patients with C-loop mutations and patients with alternate mutation sites. In 37 patients that underwent testing on and off beta-blockers, beta-blocker use was associated with a significant reduction in supine, standing and peak exercise QTc. This difference was not seen in the small group of patients (7/37) with C-loop mutations. There was no difference in QTc at 1 and 4 minutes into recovery.
CONCLUSIONS: Genetically confirmed LQT1 patients in this study cohort with C-loop mutations did not demonstrate the expected increase in QTc in response to exercise, or resultant response to beta-blocker. The apparent increased risk of cardiac events associated with C-loop mutation sites and the marked benefit received from beta-blocker therapy are not reflected by exercise-mediated effects on QTc in this study population.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LQT1; diagnosis; exercise; genetics; genotype; long-QT syndrome; phenotype

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23691991     DOI: 10.1111/jce.12172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  5 in total

Review 1.  Molecular Pathophysiology of Congenital Long QT Syndrome.

Authors:  M S Bohnen; G Peng; S H Robey; C Terrenoire; V Iyer; K J Sampson; R S Kass
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 37.312

Review 2.  Exercise Test for Patients with Long QT Syndrome.

Authors:  Cheng-Han Chan; Yu-Feng Hu; Pei-Fen Chen; I-Chien Wu; Shih-Ann Chen
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 2.672

Review 3.  Inherited arrhythmias: The cardiac channelopathies.

Authors:  Shashank P Behere; Steven N Weindling
Journal:  Ann Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2015 Sep-Dec

4.  Ten-year experience in atenolol use and exercise evaluation in children with genetically proven long QT syndrome.

Authors:  Sit-Yee Kwok; Andreas Pflaumer; Sarah-Jane Pantaleo; Erin Date; Mangesh Jadhav; Andrew Mark Davis
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2017-10-12

5.  Distinct electrophysiological and mechanical beating phenotypes of long QT syndrome type 1-specific cardiomyocytes carrying different mutations.

Authors:  Anna L Kiviaho; Antti Ahola; Kim Larsson; Kirsi Penttinen; Heikki Swan; Mari Pekkanen-Mattila; Henna Venäläinen; Kiti Paavola; Jari Hyttinen; Katriina Aalto-Setälä
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2015-04-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.