Literature DB >> 23691647

Spatial capture--recapture models for jointly estimating population density and landscape connectivity.

J Andrew Royle1, Richard B Chandler, Kimberly D Gazenski, Tabitha A Graves.   

Abstract

Population size and landscape connectivity are key determinants of population viability, yet no methods exist for simultaneously estimating density and connectivity parameters. Recently developed spatial capture--recapture (SCR) models provide a framework for estimating density of animal populations but thus far have not been used to study connectivity. Rather, all applications of SCR models have used encounter probability models based on the Euclidean distance between traps and animal activity centers, which implies that home ranges are stationary, symmetric, and unaffected by landscape structure. In this paper we devise encounter probability models based on "ecological distance," i.e., the least-cost path between traps and activity centers, which is a function of both Euclidean distance and animal movement behavior in resistant landscapes. We integrate least-cost path models into a likelihood-based estimation scheme for spatial capture-recapture models in order to estimate population density and parameters of the least-cost encounter probability model. Therefore, it is possible to make explicit inferences about animal density, distribution, and landscape connectivity as it relates to animal movement from standard capture-recapture data. Furthermore, a simulation study demonstrated that ignoring landscape connectivity can result in negatively biased density estimators under the naive SCR model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23691647     DOI: 10.1890/12-0413.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  12 in total

1.  Does aerial baiting for controlling feral cats in a heterogeneous landscape confer benefits to a threatened native meso-predator?

Authors:  Russell Palmer; Hannah Anderson; Brooke Richards; Michael D Craig; Lesley Gibson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Precision and bias of spatial capture-recapture estimates: A multi-site, multi-year Utah black bear case study.

Authors:  Greta M Schmidt; Tabitha A Graves; Jordan C Pederson; Sarah L Carroll
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 6.105

3.  Movement-assisted localization from acoustic telemetry data.

Authors:  Nathan J Hostetter; J Andrew Royle
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 3.600

4.  Investigating effects of soil chemicals on density of small mammal bioindicators using spatial capture-recapture models.

Authors:  Shannon M Gaukler; Sean M Murphy; Jesse T Berryhill; Brent E Thompson; Benjamin J Sutter; Charles D Hathcock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Spatial density estimates of Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) in the French Jura and Vosges Mountains.

Authors:  Olivier Gimenez; Sylvain Gatti; Christophe Duchamp; Estelle Germain; Alain Laurent; Fridolin Zimmermann; Eric Marboutin
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  A Comparison of Grizzly Bear Demographic Parameters Estimated from Non-Spatial and Spatial Open Population Capture-Recapture Models.

Authors:  Jesse Whittington; Michael A Sawaya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Application of Spatial and Closed Capture-Recapture Models on Known Population of the Western Derby Eland (Taurotragus derbianus derbianus) in Senegal.

Authors:  Tomáš Jůnek; Pavla Jůnková Vymyslická; Kateřina Hozdecká; Pavla Hejcmanová
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Testing the consistency of wildlife data types before combining them: the case of camera traps and telemetry.

Authors:  Viorel D Popescu; Perry Valpine; Rick A Sweitzer
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Examining Temporal Sample Scale and Model Choice with Spatial Capture-Recapture Models in the Common Leopard Panthera pardus.

Authors:  Joshua F Goldberg; Tshering Tempa; Nawang Norbu; Mark Hebblewhite; L Scott Mills; Tshewang R Wangchuk; Paul Lukacs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Large-scale variation in density of an aquatic ecosystem indicator species.

Authors:  Chris Sutherland; Angela K Fuller; J Andrew Royle; Matthew P Hare; Sean Madden
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.