| Literature DB >> 23690800 |
Rena Zhou1, Yang Li, Masahiro Umezaki, Yongming Ding, Hongwei Jiang, Alexis Comber, Hua Fu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the perceived neighborhood environment (NE) variables that are associated with physical activity (PA) in urban areas in China.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23690800 PMCID: PMC3652159 DOI: 10.1155/2013/239595
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Environ Public Health ISSN: 1687-9805
Demographics of the participants in the questionnaire-based survey and accelerometer-based survey.
| Questionnaires- | Accelerometer- | |
|---|---|---|
| Participants number | 478 | 235 |
| Agea | 39.8 ± 6.29 | 39.6 ± 5.64 |
| Genderb | ||
| Male | 231 (48.3) | 113 (48.1) |
| Female | 247 (51.7) | 122 (51.9) |
| Areab | ||
| Suburb | 231 (48.3) | 117 (49.8) |
| Downtown | 247 (51.7) | 118 (50.2) |
| BMIb | ||
| <18 | 16 (3.4) | 3 (1.3) |
| ≥18, <24 | 300 (63.2) | 154 (66.1) |
| ≥24, <28 | 127 (26.7) | 61 (26.2) |
| 28≤ | 32 (6.7) | 15 (6.4) |
| Family incomeb | ||
| <20,000 RMB | 99 (20.8) | 43 (18.5) |
| 2–40000 RMB | 150 (31.6) | 74 (31.8) |
| 40000 RMB< | 226 (47.6) | 116 (49.8) |
| Educational backgroundb | ||
| Primary school | 18 (3.8) | 8 (3.4) |
| Junior high school | 250 (52.7) | 121 (51.7) |
| High school | 93 (19.6) | 46 (19.7) |
| College | 89 (18.8) | 44 (18.8) |
| University and above | 24 (5.1) | 15 (6.4) |
adata presented as means ± SD; bdata presented as N (%).
Comparison of physical activity and neighborhood environment of participants using IPAQ, NEWS-A, and accelerometers by sex.
| Male | Female | Overall | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IPAQ-based physical activity indicatorsa | |||
| Transportation PA | |||
| Active group | 99 (42.9) | 104 (42.1) | 203 (42.5) |
| Low active group | 132 (57.1) | 143 (57.9) | 275 (57.5) |
| Leisure time PA | |||
| Active group | 57 (24.7) | 64 (25.9) | 121 (25.3) |
| Low active group | 174 (75.3) | 183 (74.1) | 357 (74.7) |
| Accelerometer-based physical activity indicatorsa | |||
| MVPA (minutes per day)* | |||
| 36- | 49 (43.4) | 71 (58.2) | 120 (51.1) |
| -35 | 64 (56.6) | 51 (41.8) | 115 (48.9) |
| Perception of neighborhood environment using the NEWS-Ab | |||
| Residential density | 348.8 ± 130.6 | 352.1 ± 130.9 | 350.5 ± 130.6 |
| Land use mix diversity | 2.88 ± 0.81 | 2.85 ± 0.81 | 2.86 ± 0.81 |
| Land use mix access | 2.88 ± 0.60 | 2.88 ± 0.58 | 2.88 ± 0.59 |
| Street connectivity | 2.82 ± 0.53 | 2.80 ± 0.51 | 2.81 ± 0.52 |
| Walking/cycling facilities | 2.68 ± 0.72 | 2.65 ± 0.70 | 2.67 ± 0.71 |
| Aesthetics | 2.69 ± 0.78 | 2.70 ± 0.75 | 2.69 ± 0.76 |
| Traffic safety | 2.85 ± 0.52 | 2.86 ± 0.52 | 2.86 ± 0.52 |
| Crime safety | 3.05 ± 0.91 | 2.98 ± 0.90 | 3.01 ± 0.90 |
*P < 0.05 MVPA, moderate-vigorous physical activity; adata presented as N (%); bdata presented as means ± SD.
Association between physical activity and neighborhood environment measures.
| Correlates of PA | Self-reported PA (IPAQ) | Accelerometer-measured PA | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transportation PA | Leisure time PA | MVPA | ||||
| (low active group and active group) | (low active group and active group) | (≥36 minutes/day group and <36 minutes/day group) | ||||
| Model Aa OR (95% CI) | Model Bb OR (95% CI) | Model A | Model B | Model A | Model B | |
| Area | ||||||
| Suburb | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| Downtown |
|
| 1.224 (0.516, 2.900) | |||
| Sex | ||||||
| Male | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| Female | 0.960 (0.654, 1.411) | 1.054 (0.676, 1.643) |
| |||
| Family income per year | ||||||
| <20,000 RMB | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| 2–40000 RMB | 1.129 (0.643, 1.983) | 1.453 (0.753, 2.805) | 0.679 (0.284, 1.623) | |||
| 40000 RMB< | 0.678 (0.389, 1.182) | 1.111 (0.585, 2.110) | 0.770 (0.324, 1.830) | |||
| Educational background | ||||||
| Primary school | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| Junior high school | 0.661 (0.223, 1.961) | 6.350 (0.793, 50.814) | 0.864 (0.160, 4.663) | |||
| High school | 0.780 (0.243, 2.502) | 3.884 (0.463, 32.611) | 2.296 (0.362, 14.580) | |||
| College | 0.581 (0.178, 1.897) | 3.493 (0.408, 29.876) | 5.157 (0.784, 33.907) | |||
| University and above | 0.665 (0.163, 2.712) | 2.054 (0.192, 22.007) | 1.502 (0.175, 12.876) | |||
| Residential density | 1.001 (1.000, 1.003) | 1.001 (0.999, 1.002) |
|
| 0.999 (0.997, 1.002) | 0.997 (0.995, 1.000) |
| Land use mix diversity | 1.117 (0.848, 1.470) | 0.967 (0.708, 1.321) | 0.986 (0.718, 1.354) | 0.932 (0.654, 1.330) | 1.124 (0.727, 1.737) | 0.935 (0.556, 1.573) |
| Land use mix access | 0.965 (0.629, 1.480) | 1.042 (0.670, 1.621) | 0.981 (0.596, 1.615) | 1.000 (0.601, 1.663) | 1.117 (0.586, 2.129) | 1.356 (0.671, 2.740) |
| Street connectivity | 0.791 (0.522, 1.198) | 0.797 (0.516, 1.232) |
|
| 1.207 (0.712, 2.046) | 1.147 (0.652, 2.017) |
| Walking/cycling facilities | 1.131 (0.825, 1.551) | 1.008 (0.724, 1.402) | 0.990 (0.688, 1.425) | 0.951 (0.650, 1.391) | 1.117 (0.720, 1.733) | 0.892 (0.552, 1.441) |
| Aesthetics | 1.156 (0.867, 1.540) | 1.103 (0.819, 1.486) | 0.986 (0.707, 1.375) | 0.945 (0.669, 1.334) | 1.145 (0.758, 1.730) | 1.040 (0.668, 1.618) |
| Traffic safety | 0.648 (0.416, 1.009) | 0.714 (0.444, 1.146) | 0.962 (0.576, 1.608) | 0.980 (0.569, 1.687) |
| 0.514 (0.257, 1.030) |
| Crime safety | 0.987 (0.785, 1.240) | 1.012 (0.799, 1.283) | 1.044 (0.800, 1.362) | 1.061 (0.806, 1.398) | 1.397 (0.970, 2.013) | 1.350 (0.912, 1.998) |
aModel A only includes neighborhood environment. bModel B also includes area, sex, family level, and educational background besides all the factors in Model A. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.