Literature DB >> 23690736

Sliding versus Deciding in Relationships: Associations with Relationship Quality, Commitment, and Infidelity.

Jesse Owen1, Galena K Rhoades, Scott M Stanley.   

Abstract

From choosing a partner to date to deciding to cohabit or marry, individuals are faced with many relationship choices. Given the costs of failed relationships (e.g., personal distress, problems with work, lower well-being for children, lost opportunities to meet other partners), it is important consider how individuals are approaching these decisions. The current study tested if more thoughtful and clear relationship decision-making processes would relate to individuals' levels of satisfaction with and dedication to their partners as well as their extra-dyadic involvements. In a sample of 252 men and women, the results showed that regardless of relationship status (i.e., dating, cohabiting, or married), those who reported more thoughtful decision-making processes also reported more dedication to their partners, higher satisfaction with the relationship, and fewer extra-dyadic involvements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Commitment; Decision-making; Infidelity; Relationship Satisfaction

Year:  2013        PMID: 23690736      PMCID: PMC3656416          DOI: 10.1080/15332691.2013.779097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Couple Relatsh Ther        ISSN: 1533-2683


  15 in total

1.  A safe haven: an attachment theory perspective on support seeking and caregiving in intimate relationships.

Authors:  N L Collins; B C Feeney
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2000-06

2.  Communication, conflict, and commitment: insights on the foundations of relationship success from a national survey.

Authors:  Scott M Stanley; Howard J Markman; Sarah W Whitton
Journal:  Fam Process       Date:  2002

3.  Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples.

Authors:  N L Collins; S J Read
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1990-04

4.  Timing is everything: Pre-engagement cohabitation and increased risk for poor marital outcomes.

Authors:  Galena H Kline; Scott M Stanley; Howard J Markman; P Antonio Olmos-Gallo; Michelle St Peters; Sarah W Whitton; Lydia M Prado
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2004-06

5.  Development and validation of a brief version of the dyadic adjustment scale with a nonparametric item analysis model.

Authors:  Stéphane Sabourin; Pierre Valois; Yvan Lussier
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2005-03

6.  Beyond global sociosexual orientations: a more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships.

Authors:  Lars Penke; Jens B Asendorpf
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2008-11

7.  Effects of gender and psychosocial factors on "friends with benefits" relationships among young adults.

Authors:  Jesse Owen; Frank D Fincham
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2010-03-27

8.  The pre-engagement cohabitation effect: a replication and extension of previous findings.

Authors:  Galena K Rhoades; Scott M Stanley; Howard J Markman
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2009-02

9.  The Revised Commitment Inventory: Psychometrics and Use with Unmarried Couples.

Authors:  Jesse Owen; Galena K Rhoades; Scott M Stanley; Howard J Markman
Journal:  J Fam Issues       Date:  2010-10-18

10.  Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process.

Authors:  C Hazan; P Shaver
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1987-03
View more
  2 in total

1.  Pre-Cohabitation Conversations for Relationships: Recommended Questions for Discussion.

Authors:  Kristina S Brown; Brooke Schmidt; Cate Morrow; Gaston Rougeaux-Burnes
Journal:  Contemp Fam Ther       Date:  2021-07-13

2.  Extradyadic Behaviors and Gender: How Do They Relate With Sexual Desire, Relationship Quality, and Attractiveness.

Authors:  Joana Arantes; Fátima Barros; Helena M Oliveira
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-03-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.