Literature DB >> 23690522

Oxygen saturation nomogram in newborns screened for critical congenital heart disease.

Priya Jegatheesan1, Dongli Song, Cathy Angell, Kamakshi Devarajan, Balaji Govindaswami.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish simultaneous pre- and postductal oxygen saturation nomograms in asymptomatic newborns when screening for critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) at ∼24 hours after birth.
METHODS: Asymptomatic term and late preterm newborns admitted to the newborn nursery were screened with simultaneous pre- and postductal oxygen saturation measurements at ∼24 hours after birth. The screening program was implemented in a stepwise fashion in 3 different affiliated institutions. Data were collected prospectively from July 2009 to March 2012 in all 3 centers.
RESULTS: We screened 13 714 healthy newborns at a median age of 25 hours. The mean preductal saturation was 98.29% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 98.27-98.31), median 98%, and mean postductal saturation was 98.57% (95% CI: 98.55-98.60), median 99%. The mean difference between the pre- and postductal saturation was -0.29% (95% CI: -0.31 to -0.27) with P < .00005. Its clinical relevance to CCHD screening remains to be determined. The postductal saturation was equal to preductal saturation in 38% and greater than preductal saturation in 40% of the screens.
CONCLUSIONS: We have established simultaneous pre- and postductal oxygen saturation nomograms at ∼24 hours after birth based on >13 000 asymptomatic newborns. Such nomograms are important to optimize screening thresholds and methodology for detecting CCHD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  asymptomatic newborns; critical congenital heart disease; oxygen saturation nomogram; oxygen saturation screening; pre- and postductal saturations; pulse oximetry screening; universal screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23690522     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2012-3320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  7 in total

1.  Comparing Retesting Rates Between Different Screening Methods for Critical Congenital Heart Disease: A Case from Northeast Brazil.

Authors:  Carolina Paim Gomes de Freitas; Felipe Alves Mourato
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  Lessons Learned From Newborn Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Defects.

Authors:  Matthew E Oster; Susan W Aucott; Jill Glidewell; Jesse Hackell; Lazaros Kochilas; Gerard R Martin; Julia Phillippi; Nelangi M Pinto; Annamarie Saarinen; Marci Sontag; Alex R Kemper
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Pregnancy at high altitude in the Andes leads to increased total vessel density in healthy newborns.

Authors:  Norina N Gassmann; Hugo A van Elteren; Tom G Goos; Claudia R Morales; Maria Rivera-Ch; Daniel S Martin; Patricia Cabala Peralta; Agustin Passano Del Carpio; Saul Aranibar Machaca; Luis Huicho; Irwin K M Reiss; Max Gassmann; Rogier C J de Jonge
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2016-07-21

4.  A comparison of retesting rates using alternative testing algorithms in the pilot implementation of critical congenital heart disease screening in Minnesota.

Authors:  Lazaros K Kochilas; Jeremiah S Menk; Annamarie Saarinen; Amy Gaviglio; Jamie L Lohr
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 1.655

5.  Pulse oximetry values of neonates admitted for care and receiving routine oxygen therapy at a resource-limited hospital in Kenya.

Authors:  Melissa C Morgan; Beth Maina; Mary Waiyego; Catherine Mutinda; Jalemba Aluvaala; Michuki Maina; Mike English
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 1.954

6.  Critical congenital heart disease screening by pulse oximetry in a neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  V Manja; B Mathew; V Carrion; S Lakshminrusimha
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 7.  Enhanced Monitoring of the Preterm Infant during Stabilization in the Delivery Room.

Authors:  Daragh Finn; Geraldine B Boylan; C Anthony Ryan; Eugene M Dempsey
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.418

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.