OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of preoperative head ultrasound scan (HUS) in a cohort of newborns also undergoing preoperative MRI as part of a prospective research study of brain injury in infants having surgery for congenital heart disease (CHD). METHODS: A total of 167 infants diagnosed with CHD were included in this 3-center study. None of the patients had clinical signs or symptoms of preoperative brain injury, and all patients received both HUS and brain MRI before undergoing surgical intervention. HUS and MRI results were reported by experienced neuroradiologists who were blinded to any specific clinical details of the study participants. The findings of the individual imaging modes were compared to evaluate for the presence of brain injury. RESULTS: Preoperative brain injury was present on HUS in 5 infants (3%) and on MRI in 44 infants (26%) (P < .001). Four of the HUS showed intraventricular hemorrhage not seen on MRI, suggesting false-positive results, and the fifth showed periventricular leukomalacia. The predominant MRI abnormality was white matter injury (n = 32). Other findings included infarct (n = 16) and hemorrhage (n = 5). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative brain injury on MRI was present in 26% of infants with CHD, but only 3% had any evidence of brain injury on HUS. Among positive HUS, 80% were false-positive results. Our findings suggest that routine HUS is not indicated in asymptomatic term or near-term neonates undergoing surgery for CHD, and MRI may be a preferable tool when the assessment of these infants is warranted.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of preoperative head ultrasound scan (HUS) in a cohort of newborns also undergoing preoperative MRI as part of a prospective research study of brain injury in infants having surgery for congenital heart disease (CHD). METHODS: A total of 167 infants diagnosed with CHD were included in this 3-center study. None of the patients had clinical signs or symptoms of preoperative brain injury, and all patients received both HUS and brain MRI before undergoing surgical intervention. HUS and MRI results were reported by experienced neuroradiologists who were blinded to any specific clinical details of the study participants. The findings of the individual imaging modes were compared to evaluate for the presence of brain injury. RESULTS: Preoperative brain injury was present on HUS in 5 infants (3%) and on MRI in 44 infants (26%) (P < .001). Four of the HUS showed intraventricular hemorrhage not seen on MRI, suggesting false-positive results, and the fifth showed periventricular leukomalacia. The predominant MRI abnormality was white matter injury (n = 32). Other findings included infarct (n = 16) and hemorrhage (n = 5). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative brain injury on MRI was present in 26% of infants with CHD, but only 3% had any evidence of brain injury on HUS. Among positive HUS, 80% were false-positive results. Our findings suggest that routine HUS is not indicated in asymptomatic term or near-term neonates undergoing surgery for CHD, and MRI may be a preferable tool when the assessment of these infants is warranted.
Entities:
Keywords:
MRI; brain imaging; congenital heart disease; head ultrasound; neonate
Authors: R R Clancy; S A McGaurn; G Wernovsky; T L Spray; W I Norwood; M L Jacobs; J D Murphy; J W Gaynor; J E Goin Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: David C Bellinger; David Wypij; Adre J duPlessis; Leonard A Rappaport; Richard A Jonas; Gil Wernovsky; Jane W Newburger Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Dean B Andropoulos; R Blaine Easley; Ken Brady; E Dean McKenzie; Jeffrey S Heinle; Heather A Dickerson; Lara Shekerdemian; Marcie Meador; Carol Eisenman; Jill V Hunter; Marie Turcich; Robert G Voigt; Charles D Fraser Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2012-06-29 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: William T Mahle; Federica Tavani; Robert A Zimmerman; Susan C Nicolson; Kristin K Galli; J William Gaynor; Robert R Clancy; Lisa M Montenegro; Thomas L Spray; Rosetta M Chiavacci; Gil Wernovsky; C Dean Kurth Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-09-24 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: L R Ment; H S Bada; P Barnes; P E Grant; D Hirtz; L A Papile; J Pinto-Martin; M Rivkin; T L Slovis Journal: Neurology Date: 2002-06-25 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Cynthia M Ortinau; Jagruti S Anadkat; Christopher D Smyser; Pirooz Eghtesady Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Dean B Andropoulos; Hasan B Ahmad; Taha Haq; Ken Brady; Stephen A Stayer; Marcie R Meador; Jill V Hunter; Carlos Rivera; Robert G Voigt; Marie Turcich; Cathy Q He; Lara S Shekerdemian; Heather A Dickerson; Charles D Fraser; E Dean McKenzie; Jeffrey S Heinle; R Blaine Easley Journal: Paediatr Anaesth Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 2.556
Authors: Clinton D Morgan; Michael S Wolf; Truc M Le; Chevis N Shannon; John C Wellons; Bret A Mettler Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Laurie L Ackerman; Stephen F Kralik; Zachary Daniels; Anne Farrell; Marcus S Schamberger; Christopher W Mastropietro Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Ann L McCarthy; Madeline E Winters; David R Busch; Ernesto Gonzalez-Giraldo; Tiffany S Ko; Jennifer M Lynch; Peter J Schwab; Rui Xiao; Erin M Buckley; Arastoo Vossough; Daniel J Licht Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2015-05-21 Impact factor: 3.953