PURPOSE: To study sex differences in survival and progression in patients with stage III or IV metastatic melanoma and to compare our results with published literature. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were retrieved from three large, randomized, controlled trials of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer in patients with stage III and two trials in patients with stage IV melanoma. Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for females compared with males, adjusted for different sets of confounders for stage III and stage IV, respectively. RESULTS: In 2,734 stage III patients, females had a superior 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate compared with males (51.5% v 43.3%), an adjusted HR for DSS of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.76 to 0.95), and an adjusted HR for relapse-free survival of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.95). In 1,306 stage IV patients, females also exhibited an advantage in DSS (2-year survival rate, 14.1% v 19.0%; adjusted HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.92) as well as for progression-free survival (adjusted HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.88). This female advantage was consistent across pre- and postmenopausal age categories and across different prognostic subgroups. However, the female advantage seems to become smaller in patients with higher metastatic tumor load. CONCLUSION: The persistent independent female advantage, even after metastasis to lymph nodes and distant sites, contradicts theories about sex behavioral differences as an explanation for this phenomenon. A biologic sex trait seems to profoundly influence melanoma progression and survival, even in advanced disease.
PURPOSE: To study sex differences in survival and progression in patients with stage III or IV metastatic melanoma and to compare our results with published literature. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were retrieved from three large, randomized, controlled trials of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer in patients with stage III and two trials in patients with stage IV melanoma. Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for females compared with males, adjusted for different sets of confounders for stage III and stage IV, respectively. RESULTS: In 2,734 stage III patients, females had a superior 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate compared with males (51.5% v 43.3%), an adjusted HR for DSS of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.76 to 0.95), and an adjusted HR for relapse-free survival of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.95). In 1,306 stage IV patients, females also exhibited an advantage in DSS (2-year survival rate, 14.1% v 19.0%; adjusted HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.92) as well as for progression-free survival (adjusted HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.88). This female advantage was consistent across pre- and postmenopausal age categories and across different prognostic subgroups. However, the female advantage seems to become smaller in patients with higher metastatic tumor load. CONCLUSION: The persistent independent female advantage, even after metastasis to lymph nodes and distant sites, contradicts theories about sex behavioral differences as an explanation for this phenomenon. A biologic sex trait seems to profoundly influence melanoma progression and survival, even in advanced disease.
Authors: Theresa H M Keegan; Susan M Swetter; Li Tao; John B Sunwoo; Christina A Clarke Journal: J Invest Dermatol Date: 2015-08-19 Impact factor: 8.551
Authors: E Rodríguez-Lomba; I Marquez-Rodas; E Mercader-Cidoncha; R Suárez-Fernández; J A Avilés-Izquierdo Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Tina J Hieken; Amy E Glasgow; Elizabeth Ann L Enninga; Lisa A Kottschade; Roxana S Dronca; Svetomir N Markovic; Matthew S Block; Elizabeth B Habermann Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2020-02-27 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Rachel M Cymerman; Yongzhao Shao; Kun Wang; Yilong Zhang; Era C Murzaku; Lauren A Penn; Iman Osman; David Polsky Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2016-05-27 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Jennifer L McQuade; Carrie R Daniel; Kenneth R Hess; Carmen Mak; Daniel Y Wang; Rajat R Rai; John J Park; Lauren E Haydu; Christine Spencer; Matthew Wongchenko; Stephen Lane; Dung-Yang Lee; Mathilde Kaper; Meredith McKean; Kathryn E Beckermann; Samuel M Rubinstein; Isabelle Rooney; Luna Musib; Nageshwar Budha; Jessie Hsu; Theodore S Nowicki; Alexandre Avila; Tomas Haas; Maneka Puligandla; Sandra Lee; Shenying Fang; Jennifer A Wargo; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Jeffrey E Lee; Patrick Hwu; Paul B Chapman; Jeffrey A Sosman; Dirk Schadendorf; Jean-Jacques Grob; Keith T Flaherty; Dana Walker; Yibing Yan; Edward McKenna; Jeffrey J Legos; Matteo S Carlino; Antoni Ribas; John M Kirkwood; Georgina V Long; Douglas B Johnson; Alexander M Menzies; Michael A Davies Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2018-02-12 Impact factor: 41.316