Literature DB >> 23690417

Prognostic score including gene mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.

Raphaël Itzykson1, Olivier Kosmider, Aline Renneville, Véronique Gelsi-Boyer, Manja Meggendorfer, Margot Morabito, Céline Berthon, Lionel Adès, Pierre Fenaux, Odile Beyne-Rauzy, Norbert Vey, Thorsten Braun, Torsten Haferlach, François Dreyfus, Nicholas C P Cross, Claude Preudhomme, Olivier A Bernard, Michaela Fontenay, William Vainchenker, Susanne Schnittger, Daniel Birnbaum, Nathalie Droin, Eric Solary.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Several prognostic scoring systems have been proposed for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), a disease in which some gene mutations-including ASXL1-have been associated with poor prognosis in univariable analyses. We developed and validated a prognostic score for overall survival (OS) based on mutational status and standard clinical variables. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We genotyped ASXL1 and up to 18 other genes including epigenetic (TET2, EZH2, IDH1, IDH2, DNMT3A), splicing (SF3B1, SRSF2, ZRSF2, U2AF1), transcription (RUNX1, NPM1, TP53), and signaling (NRAS, KRAS, CBL, JAK2, FLT3) regulators in 312 patients with CMML. Genotypes and clinical variables were included in a multivariable Cox model of OS validated by bootstrapping. A scoring system was developed using regression coefficients from this model.
RESULTS: ASXL1 mutations (P < .0001) and, to a lesser extent, SRSF2 (P = .03), CBL (P = .003), and IDH2 (P = .03) mutations predicted inferior OS in univariable analysis. The retained independent prognostic factors included ASXL1 mutations, age older than 65 years, WBC count greater than 15 ×10(9)/L, platelet count less than 100 ×10(9)/L, and anemia (hemoglobin < 10 g/dL in female patients, < 11g/dL in male patients). The resulting five-parameter prognostic score delineated three groups of patients with median OS not reached, 38.5 months, and 14.4 months, respectively (P < .0001), and was validated in an independent cohort of 165 patients (P < .0001).
CONCLUSION: A new prognostic score including ASXL1 status, age, hemoglobin, WBC, and platelet counts defines three groups of CMML patients with distinct outcomes. Based on concordance analysis, this score appears more discriminative than those based solely on clinical parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23690417     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.47.3314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  187 in total

Review 1.  Aberrant histone modifications induced by mutant ASXL1 in myeloid neoplasms.

Authors:  Shuhei Asada; Toshio Kitamura
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.490

2.  Additional mutations in SRSF2, ASXL1 and/or RUNX1 identify a high-risk group of patients with KIT D816V(+) advanced systemic mastocytosis.

Authors:  M Jawhar; J Schwaab; S Schnittger; M Meggendorfer; M Pfirrmann; K Sotlar; H-P Horny; G Metzgeroth; S Kluger; N Naumann; C Haferlach; T Haferlach; P Valent; W-K Hofmann; A Fabarius; N C P Cross; A Reiter
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 11.528

3.  The landscape of myeloid neoplasms with isochromosome 17q discloses a specific mutation profile and is characterized by an accumulation of prognostically adverse molecular markers.

Authors:  M Meggendorfer; C Haferlach; M Zenger; K Macijewski; W Kern; T Haferlach
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 11.528

4.  Advances in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia and future prospects: Lessons learned from precision genomics.

Authors:  Abhishek A Mangaonkar; Mrinal M Patnaik
Journal:  Adv Cell Gene Ther       Date:  2019-01-16

Review 5.  Posttranslational modifications of RUNX1 as potential anticancer targets.

Authors:  S Goyama; G Huang; M Kurokawa; J C Mulloy
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Efficacy of intermittent combined RAF and MEK inhibition in a patient with concurrent BRAF- and NRAS-mutant malignancies.

Authors:  Omar Abdel-Wahab; Virginia M Klimek; Alisa A Gaskell; Agnes Viale; Donavan Cheng; Eunhee Kim; Raajit Rampal; Mark Bluth; James J Harding; Margaret K Callahan; Taha Merghoub; Michael F Berger; David B Solit; Neal Rosen; Ross L Levine; Paul B Chapman
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 7.  Increasing recognition and emerging therapies argue for dedicated clinical trials in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Aline Renneville; Mrinal M Patnaik; Onyee Chan; Eric Padron; Eric Solary
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 11.528

8.  Level of RUNX1 activity is critical for leukemic predisposition but not for thrombocytopenia.

Authors:  Iléana Antony-Debré; Vladimir T Manchev; Nathalie Balayn; Dominique Bluteau; Cécile Tomowiak; Céline Legrand; Thierry Langlois; Olivia Bawa; Lucie Tosca; Gérard Tachdjian; Bruno Leheup; Najet Debili; Isabelle Plo; Jason A Mills; Deborah L French; Mitchell J Weiss; Eric Solary; Remi Favier; William Vainchenker; Hana Raslova
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 9.  The Role of Additional Sex Combs-Like Proteins in Cancer.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Micol; Omar Abdel-Wahab
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 10.  Splicing factor gene mutations in hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  Borja Saez; Matthew J Walter; Timothy A Graubert
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.