PURPOSE: This study examined how characteristics of practice leadership affect the change process in a statewide initiative to improve the quality of diabetes and asthma care. METHODS: We used a mixed methods approach, involving analyses of existing quality improvement data on 76 practices with at least 1 year of participation and focus groups with clinicians and staff in a 12-practice subsample. Existing data included monthly diabetes or asthma measures (clinical measures) and monthly practice implementation, leadership, and practice engagement scores rated by an external practice coach. RESULTS: Of the 76 practices, 51 focused on diabetes and 25 on asthma. In aggregate, 50% to 78% made improvements within in each clinical measure in the first year. The odds of making practice changes were greater for practices with higher leadership scores (odds ratios = 2.41-4.20). Among practices focused on diabetes, those with higher leadership scores had higher odds of performing nephropathy screening (odds ratio = 1.37, 95% CI, 1.08-1.74); no significant associations were seen for the intermediate outcome measures of hemoglobin A1c, blood pressure, and cholesterol. Focus groups revealed the importance of a leader, typically a physician, who believed in the transformation work (ie, a visionary leader) and promoted practice engagement through education and cross-training. Practices with greater change implementation also mentioned the importance of a midlevel operational leader who helped to create and sustain practice changes. This person communicated and interacted well with, and was respected by both clinicians and staff. CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of a vision for transformation, operational leaders within practices can facilitate practice changes that are associated with clinical improvement.
PURPOSE: This study examined how characteristics of practice leadership affect the change process in a statewide initiative to improve the quality of diabetes and asthma care. METHODS: We used a mixed methods approach, involving analyses of existing quality improvement data on 76 practices with at least 1 year of participation and focus groups with clinicians and staff in a 12-practice subsample. Existing data included monthly diabetes or asthma measures (clinical measures) and monthly practice implementation, leadership, and practice engagement scores rated by an external practice coach. RESULTS: Of the 76 practices, 51 focused on diabetes and 25 on asthma. In aggregate, 50% to 78% made improvements within in each clinical measure in the first year. The odds of making practice changes were greater for practices with higher leadership scores (odds ratios = 2.41-4.20). Among practices focused on diabetes, those with higher leadership scores had higher odds of performing nephropathy screening (odds ratio = 1.37, 95% CI, 1.08-1.74); no significant associations were seen for the intermediate outcome measures of hemoglobin A1c, blood pressure, and cholesterol. Focus groups revealed the importance of a leader, typically a physician, who believed in the transformation work (ie, a visionary leader) and promoted practice engagement through education and cross-training. Practices with greater change implementation also mentioned the importance of a midlevel operational leader who helped to create and sustain practice changes. This person communicated and interacted well with, and was respected by both clinicians and staff. CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of a vision for transformation, operational leaders within practices can facilitate practice changes that are associated with clinical improvement.
Authors: Kaia Gallagher; Paul A Nutting; Donald E Nease; Deborah G Graham; Aaron J Bonham; W Perry Dickinson; Deborah S Main Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2010 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Warren P Newton; Ann Lefebvre; Katrina E Donahue; Thomas Bacon; Allen Dobson Journal: J Contin Educ Health Prof Date: 2010 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Paul A Nutting; Kaia M Gallagher; Kim Riley; Suzanne White; Allen J Dietrich; W Perry Dickinson Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health Date: 2006-09-13
Authors: Rebecca S Etz; Deborah J Cohen; Steven H Woolf; Jodi Summers Holtrop; Katrina E Donahue; Nicole F Isaacson; Kurt C Stange; Robert L Ferrer; Ardis L Olson Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Stanley M Kozakowski; M Patrice Eiff; Larry A Green; Perry A Pugno; Elaine Waller; Samuel M Jones; Gerald Fetter; Patricia A Carney Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2015-06
Authors: Jacqueline R Halladay; Kathleen Mottus; Kristin Reiter; C Madeline Mitchell; Katrina E Donahue; Wilson M Gabbard; Kimberly Gush Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2016 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Andrada Tomoaia-Cotisel; Debra L Scammon; Norman J Waitzman; Peter F Cronholm; Jacqueline R Halladay; David L Driscoll; Leif I Solberg; Clarissa Hsu; Ming Tai-Seale; Vanessa Hiratsuka; Sarah C Shih; Michael D Fetters; Christopher G Wise; Jeffrey A Alexander; Diane Hauser; Carmit K McMullen; Sarah Hudson Scholle; Manasi A Tirodkar; Laura Schmidt; Katrina E Donahue; Michael L Parchman; Kurt C Stange Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2013 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Andrew Wang; Teresa Pollack; Lauren A Kadziel; Samuel M Ross; Megan McHugh; Neil Jordan; Abel N Kho Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-07-31 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: David White; Paul Krueger; Christopher Meaney; Viola Antao; Florence Kim; Jeffrey C Kwong Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: Camille P Vaughan; Alayne D Markland; Phillip P Smith; Kathryn L Burgio; George A Kuchel Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2017-12-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Benjamin F Crabtree; Jenna Howard; William L Miller; DeANN Cromp; Clarissa Hsu; Katie Coleman; Brian Austin; Margaret Flinter; Leah Tuzzio; Edward H Wagner Journal: Milbank Q Date: 2020-05-13 Impact factor: 4.911