Literature DB >> 23690158

Effects of polymeric formula vs elemental formula in neonatal piglets with short bowel syndrome.

Zheng Hua1, Justine M Turner, Diana R Mager, David L Sigalet, Pamela R Wizzard, Patrick N Nation, Ron O Ball, Paul B Pencharz, Paul W Wales.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intestinal adaptation is important for recovery in short bowel syndrome (SBS). This process is dependent on the presence of enteral nutrition (EN) and trophic factors, such as glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2). In clinical practice, elemental formula is often used to feed neonates with SBS, whereas animal studies suggest polymeric formula promotes better intestinal adaptation. In neonatal piglet models of SBS, with or without ileum, we compared the elemental with the polymeric formula, including the effect on endogenous GLP-2.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight piglets underwent 75% mid-intestinal resection with jejunoileal anastomosis, 75% distal-intestinal resection with jejunocolic anastomosis (JC), or sham without resection. Parenteral nutrition (PN) started postoperatively, tapering as EN was increased, according to clinical criteria, based on diarrhea and weight. Within groups, piglets were randomized to an isocaloric/isonitrogenous elemental (amino acid) or polymeric (intact protein) diet. Plasma GLP-2 and histology for adaptation were measured at 14 days.
RESULTS: Within both SBS and control groups, no difference in adaptation was observed according to diet. A difference was observed only within the JC piglet group with regard to clinical outcomes. In these piglets, compared with elemental formula, the polymeric formula was associated with more diarrhea ( P = .023) and longer duration of PN support (P = .047).
CONCLUSION: An overall benefit of the polymeric formula over the elemental formula on gut adaptation was not observed. Furthermore, SBS piglets without ileum had less ability to tolerate polymeric formula, contributing to more days of PN support.

Entities:  

Keywords:  elemental formula; enteral nutrition; glucagon like peptide-2; neonatal short bowel syndrome; piglet model; polymeric formula

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23690158     DOI: 10.1177/0148607113489151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr        ISSN: 0148-6071            Impact factor:   4.016


  5 in total

Review 1.  Current Knowledge of Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Preterm Infants and the Impact of Different Types of Enteral Nutrition Products.

Authors:  Jocelyn Shulhan; Bryan Dicken; Lisa Hartling; Bodil Mk Larsen
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 2.  Animal models of gastrointestinal and liver diseases. Animal models of infant short bowel syndrome: translational relevance and challenges.

Authors:  Per T Sangild; Denise M Ney; David L Sigalet; Andreas Vegge; Douglas Burrin
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 4.052

3.  Nutritional support process for a patient with short bowel syndrome in conjunction with panperitonitis: a case report.

Authors:  Sun Jung Kim; Bo Ram Kim; Song Mi Lee; Hee Jung Kong; Cheung Soo Shin
Journal:  Clin Nutr Res       Date:  2013-07-23

4.  Outcomes and Perioperative Nutritional Management in a Porcine Model of Short Bowel Syndrome.

Authors:  Savas Theodore Tsikis; Scott C Fligor; Jordan D Secor; Lumeng J Yu; Amy Pan; Greta Loring; Eric First; Arthur P Nedder; Robin M Grammer; Coral Rudie; Kathleen M Gura; Mark Puder
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.417

5.  Postoperative nutritional support of the patient with gut gangrene-a case report.

Authors:  Samra Imran; Afifa Tanweer
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 2.000

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.