Literature DB >> 23689381

Aggressive fluid and sodium restriction in acute decompensated heart failure: a randomized clinical trial.

Graziella Badin Aliti1, Eneida R Rabelo, Nadine Clausell, Luís E Rohde, Andreia Biolo, Luis Beck-da-Silva.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: The benefits of fluid and sodium restriction in patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) are unclear.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of a fluid-restricted (maximum fluid intake, 800 mL/d) and sodium-restricted (maximum dietary intake, 800 mg/d) diet (intervention group [IG]) vs a diet with no such restrictions (control group [CG]) on weight loss and clinical stability during a 3-day period in patients hospitalized with ADHF.
DESIGN: Randomized, parallel-group clinical trial with blinded outcome assessments.
SETTING: Emergency room, wards, and intensive care unit. PARTICIPANTS: Adult inpatients with ADHF, systolic dysfunction, and a length of stay of 36 hours or less. INTERVENTION: Fluid restriction (maximum fluid intake, 800 mL/d) and additional sodium restriction (maximum dietary intake, 800 mg/d) were carried out until the seventh hospital day or, in patients whose length of stay was less than 7 days, until discharge. The CG received a standard hospital diet, with liberal fluid and sodium intake. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Weight loss and clinical stability at 3-day assessment, daily perception of thirst, and readmissions within 30 days.
RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were enrolled (IG, 38; CG, 37). Most were male; ischemic heart disease was the predominant cause of heart failure (17 patients [23%]), and the mean (SD) left ventricular ejection fraction was 26% (8.7%). The groups were homogeneous in terms of baseline characteristics. Weight loss was similar in both groups (between-group difference in variation of 0.25 kg [95% CI, -1.95 to 2.45]; P = .82) as well as change in clinical congestion score (between-group difference in variation of 0.59 points [95% CI, -2.21 to 1.03]; P = .47) at 3 days. Thirst was significantly worse in the IG (5.1 [2.9]) than the CG (3.44 [2.0]) at the end of the study period (between-group difference, 1.66 points; time × group interaction; P = .01). There were no significant between-group differences in the readmission rate at 30 days (IG, 11 patients [29%]; CG, 7 patients [19%]; P = .41). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Aggressive fluid and sodium restriction has no effect on weight loss or clinical stability at 3 days and is associated with a significant increase in perceived thirst. We conclude that sodium and water restriction in patients admitted for ADHF are unnecessary. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01133236.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23689381     DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  37 in total

Review 1.  Heart failure in very old adults.

Authors:  Daniel E Forman; Ali Ahmed; Jerome L Fleg
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2013-12

2.  Perioperative restricted fluid therapy preserves immunological function in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hong-Ying Jie; Ji-Lu Ye; Hai-Hua Zhou; Yun-Xiang Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Gaps in the Heart Failure Guidelines.

Authors:  Bao Tran; Gregg C Fonarow
Journal:  Card Fail Rev       Date:  2015-04

Review 4.  Dietary Self-management in Heart Failure: High Tech or High Touch?

Authors:  Eloisa Colin-Ramirez; JoAnne Arcand; Justin A Ezekowitz
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-03

Review 5.  Gaps in the Heart Failure Guidelines.

Authors:  Bao Tran; Gregg C Fonarow
Journal:  Eur Cardiol       Date:  2014-12

Review 6.  Nutrition intervention in heart failure: should consumption of the DASH eating pattern be recommended to improve outcomes?

Authors:  Renad Abu-Sawwa; Sandra B Dunbar; Arshed A Quyyumi; Elisabeth L P Sattler
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 7.  Effects of limiting fluid intake on clinical and laboratory outcomes in patients with heart failure. Results of a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  R De Vecchis; C Baldi; C Cioppa; A Giasi; A Fusco
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 8.  Critical care medicine 2013: a review and prospect.

Authors:  Wei Huang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 9.  Diuretic Treatment in Heart Failure.

Authors:  David H Ellison; G Michael Felker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Fluid Management in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Pellicori; Kuldeep Kaur; Andrew L Clark
Journal:  Card Fail Rev       Date:  2015-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.