Literature DB >> 23689073

Clinical experience with a novel glaucoma drainage implant.

James Kim1, R Rand Allingham, Jason Hall, Bruce Klitzman, Sandra Stinnett, Sanjay Asrani.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of an Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) modified with a polyethylene shell (M4) to reduce the fibrotic reaction around the drainage plate compared with the S2 and FP7 models in patients with glaucoma.
METHODS: The medical records of patients who underwent implantation of the AGV FP7, S2, and M4 were reviewed. The primary outcome measure was cumulative probability of success, defined as an intraocular pressure (IOP) between 5 and 18 mm Hg and >20% reduction of IOP without loss of light perception, need for additional IOP-lowering surgical procedures, or removal of AGV.
RESULTS: Seventy-six, 38, and 40 eyes received the FP7, S2, and M4 with a mean follow-up time of 578±157, 662±186, and 504±158 days, respectively. The mean IOP was reduced from 31.0±10.6 to 13.9±5.5 mm Hg in the FP7 group, 33.5±12.1 to 15.8±8.1 mm Hg in the S2 group, and 27.0±12.0 to 15.0±4.0 mm Hg in the M4 group at 1 year (P=0.31). At 1 year, the cumulative probability of success was 70%, 66%, and 80% and at 18 months, 61%, 53%, and 52% in the FP7, S2, and M4 groups, respectively (P=0.99). Complications were similar among groups.
CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference was observed between the AGV M4, FP7, and S2 at 1 year. Additional follow-up is required to determine its long-term safety profile and efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23689073     DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182955d73

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of Silicone- and Porous-Plate Ahmed Glaucoma Valves.

Authors:  Tina M Roa; Peter A Netland; Vital P Costa; Steven R Sarkisian; Lama A Al-Aswad; Marlene R Moster; Iqbal I K Ahmed
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2020-07-16

2.  Altered expression of fibrosis genes in capsules of failed Ahmed glaucoma valve implants.

Authors:  Alka Mahale; Maha W Othman; Sami Al Shahwan; Ibrahim Al Jadaan; Ohood Owaydha; Zahid Khan; Deepak P Edward
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Ahmed glaucoma valve implant: surgical technique and complications.

Authors:  Ivano Riva; Gloria Roberti; Francesco Oddone; Anastasios Gp Konstas; Luciano Quaranta
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-17

4.  Scleral avulsion after Ahmed valve M4 removal.

Authors:  Hafeezullah Najla; Ahmad Sameer
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03-07

5.  Clinical Experience with the M4 Ahmed Glaucoma Drainage Implant.

Authors:  Ilya Sluch; Brett Gudgel; Justin Dvorak; Mary Anne Ahluwalia; Kai Ding; Steve Vold; Steven Sarkisian
Journal:  J Curr Glaucoma Pract       Date:  2017-10-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.