Literature DB >> 2368850

Environmental and biological monitoring for lead exposure in California workplaces.

L Rudolph1, D S Sharp, S Samuels, C Perkins, J Rosenberg.   

Abstract

Patterns of environmental and biological monitoring for lead exposure were surveyed in lead-using industries in California. Employer self-reporting indicates a large proportion of potentially lead-exposed workers have never participated in a monitoring program. Only 2.6 percent of facilities have done environmental monitoring for lead, and only 1.4 percent have routine biological monitoring programs. Monitoring practices vary by size of facility, with higher proportions in industries in which larger facilities predominate. Almost 80 percent of battery manufacturing employees work in job classifications which have been monitored, versus only 1 percent of radiator-repair workers. These findings suggest that laboratory-based surveillance for occupational lead poisoning may seriously underestimate the true number of lead poisoned workers and raise serious questions regarding compliance with key elements of the OSHA Lead Standard.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2368850      PMCID: PMC1404773          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.80.8.921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  2 in total

1.  The prevalence of screening in industry: report from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health National Occupational Hazard Survey.

Authors:  J M Ratcliffe; W E Halperin; T M Frazier; D S Sundin; L Delaney; R W Hornung
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1986-10

2.  Elevated blood lead in California adults, 1987: results of a statewide surveillance program based on laboratory reports.

Authors:  N Maizlish; L Rudolph; P Sutton; J R Jones; K W Kizer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 9.308

  2 in total
  19 in total

1.  Elevated blood lead levels among adults in Massachusetts, 1991-1995.

Authors:  C M Tumpowsky; L K Davis; R Rabin
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Elevated blood lead levels in children of construction workers.

Authors:  E A Whelan; G M Piacitelli; B Gerwel; T M Schnorr; C A Mueller; J Gittleman; T D Matte
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Lead exposure in the construction industry: results from the California Occupational Lead Registry, 1987 through 1989.

Authors:  K Waller; A M Osorio; N Maizlish; S Royce
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Adult blood lead reporting in New York State, 1994-2006.

Authors:  Kitty H Gelberg; Alicia Fletcher
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  The development of registries for surveillance of adult lead exposure, 1981 to 1992.

Authors:  M E Baser
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Surveillance of occupational lead exposure in New Jersey: 1986 to 1989.

Authors:  A Tepper
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  A rapid lead test: public outreach and testing to detect leachable lead in ceramic ware.

Authors:  A M Beale; A L Craigmill; S Wetzlich
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Toward a holistic approach to public health surveillance.

Authors:  B S Levy
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Lead in the modern workplace.

Authors:  P J Landrigan; E K Silbergeld; J R Froines; R M Pfeffer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Company characteristics and workplace medical testing.

Authors:  L I Boden; H Cabral
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.