| Literature DB >> 23688388 |
Mohammad Hossein Boskabady1, Alaleh Vatanprast, Haydar Parsaee, Morteza Boskabady.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The possible mechanism(s) of inotropic and chronotropic effects of the extract from Rosa damascena (R. damascena) on heart was examined.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23688388 PMCID: PMC3661371 DOI: 10.1186/2008-2231-21-38
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Daru ISSN: 1560-8115 Impact factor: 3.117
Figure 1Concentration response curves of aqueous-ethanolic extract from and isoprenaline, on heart rate of guinea pigs in group 1 (in the presence and absence of propranolol), (a for the isoprenaline and b for the extract), group 2 experiments (in the presence and absence of methacholine), (c for the isoprenaline and d for the extract) and group 3 (in the presence diltiazem), (e for the extract). Statistical differences between the data in the presence and absence of propranolol and methacholie; *; p < 0.05, **; p < 0.01. Statistical differences between the data of each concentration of extract or isoprenaline compared to baseline value; +; p < 0.05, ++; p < 0.01, +++; p < 0.001. (n = 12 for each group).
Increased heart rate and contractility due to the final concentration pof the extract and isoprenaline (precent propertion to baseline values in group 1 and 2 experiments and the statistical differences between the extract and isoprenaline)
| Group 1 | Rate | 207.6 ± 11.0 | 162.6 ± 11.8 | p < 0.01 | 281.8 ± 21.9 | 248.6 ± 21.0 | NS |
| Contractility | 227.7 ± 31.6 | 362.4 ± 36.9 | p < 0.01 | 357.5 ± 45.6 | 577.1 ± 62.9 | p < 0.01 | |
| Group 2 | Rate | 192.8 ± 12.9 | 204.2 ± 10.2 | NS | 308.7 ± 31.0 | 303.4 ± 36.6 | NS |
| Contractility | 244.8 ± 18.9 | 403.7 ± 42.1 | p < 0.005 | 323.9 ± 44.5 | 499.9 ± 64.6 | p < 0.05 | |
Data were expressed as mean ± SEM. An.: antagonist. St.Di: Statistical difference.
Figure 2Concentration response curves of aqueous-ethanolic extract from and isoprenaline, on heart contractility of guinea pigs in group 1 (in the presence and absence of propranolol), (a for the isoprenaline and b for the extract), group 2 experiments (in the presence and absence of methacholine), (c for the isoprenaline and d for the extract) and group 3 (in the presence diltiazem), (e for the extract). Statistical differences between the the data in the presence and absence of propranolol and methacholie; NS: non-significant difference, *; p < 0.05, **; p < 0.01. Statistical differences between the data of each concentration of extract or isoprenaline compared to baseline value; +; p < 0.05, ++; p < 0.01, +++; p < 0.001. (n = 12 for each group).
Correlation between the effects of aqueous-ethanolic extract from and isoprenaline on heart rate and contractility of isolated guinea pig heart with concentrations in three groups of experiments
| | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | HR | 0.4 | p < 0.005 | 0.6 | p < 0.001 | 0.7 | p < 0.001 | 0.7 | p < 0.001 |
| Cont | 0.4 | p < 0.01 | 0.6 | p < 0.001 | 0.3 | p < 0.05 | 0.7 | p < 0.001 | |
| Group 2 | HR | 0.6 | p < 0.001 | 0.6 | p < 0.001 | 0.7 | p < 0.001 | 0.7 | p < 0.001 |
| Cont | 0.7 | p < 0.001 | 0.7 | p < 0.001 | 0.3 | p < 0.05 | 0.6 | p < 0.001 | |
| Group 3 | HR | | | 0.5 | p < 0.001 | | | | |
| Cont | 0.5 | p < 0.001 | |||||||
For abbreviations see Table 1.