Literature DB >> 23688269

Detection of E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts in human non-small-cell lung cancer.

Min-Li Mo1, Zhao Chen, Hai-Meng Zhou, Hui Li, Tomomi Hirata, David M Jablons, Biao He.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: E2A-PBX1 fusion gene caused by t(1;19)(q23;p13), has been well characterized in acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL). There is no report on E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
METHODS: We used polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts in human NSCLC tissue specimens and cell lines. We analyzed correlation of E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts with clinical outcomes in 76 patients with adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and other subgroups. We compared mutation status of k-ras, p53 and EGFR in 22 patients with E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts.
RESULTS: We detected E2A-PBX1 transcripts in 23 of 184 (12.5%) NSCLC tissue specimens and 3 of 13 (23.1%) NSCLC cell lines. Presence of E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts correlated with smoking status in female patients (P=0.048), AIS histology (P=0.006) and tumor size (P=0.026). The overall survival was associated with gender among AIS patients (P=0.0378) and AIS patients without E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts (P=0.0345), but not among AIS patients with E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts (P=0.6401). The overall survival was also associated with status of E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts among AIS stage IA patients (P=0.0363) and AIS stage IA female patients (P=0.0174). In addition, among the 22 patients with E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts, 12 (54.5%) patients including all four non-smokers, showed no common mutations in k-ras, p53 and EGFR.
CONCLUSIONS: E2A-PBX1 fusion gene caused by t(1;19)(q23;p13) may be a common genetic change in AIS and a survival determinant for female AIS patients at early stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23688269      PMCID: PMC3661382          DOI: 10.1186/1756-9966-32-29

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 0392-9078


Background

Lung cancer has been the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in developed countries [1]. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for around 80% of all lung cancer cases. Somatic events, such as point mutation, genomic rearrangements (e.g. translocation) and changes in copy number, usually cooperatively cause alterations in oncogenes, tumor-suppressor genes, and microRNA genes, and lead to the multi-step carcinogenesis [2,3]. During tumor initiation and/or progression, encoded oncogenic proteins activated by translocations or mutations can alter cell proliferation and/or apoptosis [3], resulting in transformation events. Fusion transcripts can be caused by chromosomal translocations and may occur more frequently in solid tumors than previously understood [2-4]. E2A-PBX1 fusion protein contains the transactivation domain of E2A and the DNA-binding domain of PBX1 and is generated by t(1;19)(q23;p13) translocation [5]. t(1;19) occurs in 5% of pre-B-cell acute lymphoid leukemias (ALL) in children and adults [6] and E2A-PBX1 has been widely characterized in ALL [5-15]. E2A-PBX1 can cause transformation in several cell types in vitro and induce lymphoblastic lymphomas in transgenic mice [7-9]. Target genes of E2A-PBX1 includes fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-15 [13], WNT-16 [14], and some novel genes [10], etc. Bmi-1 regulation of INK4A-ARF was required for transformation of hematopoietic progenitors by E2A-PBX1 [15]. However, there has been no report on detection of E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts in solid tumors. In this study, we investigated into the detection of E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts in NSCLC and compared this genetic change with three other common mutations in NSCLC (i.e. k-ras, p53 and EGFR) [16-18]. These data suggest that E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts caused by t(1;19)(q23;p13) may be a common somatic genetic change of importance in solid tumors and E2A-PBX1 may be a novel target for prognosis and therapy in adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) [19].

Methods

Patients and tissue specimens

A total of 184 patients were chosen in this study. All eligible patients without preoperative chemotherapy or radiation treatment underwent surgical resection of a primary NSCLC and had adequate mediastinal lymph node staging at UCSF between July 1997 and January 2007. Their clinical information of patients was summarized in Table  1. Information on clinical variables and patient follow-up were obtained from a prospectively maintained database including all subjects with banked tissue in the study. Patients consented to tissue specimen collection prospectively, and the study was approved by UCSF Human Research Protection Program Committee on Human Research. Tissue specimens were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen at the time of the operation and stored in -150°C freezer.
Table 1

Characteristics of NSCLC patients in the study cohort

  Total (%)E2A-PBX1 positive (%)E2A-PBX1 negative (%)P valueMedian overall survival (95% CI)P value
 
Total
184 (100)
23 (12.5)
161 (87.5)
 
105.60 (55.41 ~ 155.79)
 
Age
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mean (years)
66.9 ± 12.0
66.0 ± 11.7
67.0 ± 12.1
0.698*
 
 
 
Range (years)
25-91
39-84
25-91
 
 
 
 
<71
109 (100)
13 (11.9)
96 (88.1)
0.777
69.00 (43.73 ~ 94.27)
0.7069
 
≥71
75 (100)
10 (13.3)
65 (86.7)
 
105.60 (18.53 ~ 192.67)
 
Gender
 
 
 
0.215
 
 
 
Male
78 (100)
7 (9.0)
71 (91.0)
 
64.70 (NA)
0.0889
 
Female
106 (100)
16 (15.1)
90 (84.9)
 
105.60 (57.58 ~ 153.62)
 
Race
 
 
 
0.606
 
0.1430
 
Caucasian
136 (100)
17 (12.5)
119 (87.5)
 
81.70 (52.59 ~ 110.81)
 
 
Asian
27 (100)
3 (11.1)
24 (88.9)
 
64.70 (45.79 ~ 83.61)
 
 
Hispanic
7 (100)
2 (28.6)
5 (71.4)
 
NR
 
 
African-American
7 (100)
0
7 (100)
 
NR
 
 
Others
7 (100)
1 (14.3)
6 (85.7)
 
 
 
Smoking
 
 
 
0.174
 
0.0868
 
Smoker
127 (100)
19 (15.0)
108 (85.0)
 
69.00 (42.36 ~ 95.64)
 
 
Non-smoker
53 (100)
4 (7.5)
49 (92.5)
 
105.60 (35.86 ~ 175.34)
 
 
Unknown
4 (100)
0
4 (100)
 
 
 
Pack/Year (smoker)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mean
41.6 ± 23.5
46.3 ± 26.7
30.9 ± 35.9
0.623*
 
 
 
Range
1-160
5-90
1-160
 
 
 
Gender × Smoking
 
 
 
0.097
 
0.0258
 
Male, Smoker
59 (100)
5 (8.5)
54 (91.5)
0.7331
56.20 (27.25 ~ 85.15)
0.07491
 
Male, Non-smoker
18 (100)
2 (11.1)
16 (88.9)
 
NR
 
 
Female, Smoker
68 (100)
14 (20.6)
54 (79.4)
0.0482
81.70 (41.68 ~ 121.72)
0.67142
 
Female, Non-smoker
35 (100)
2 (5.7)
33 (94.3)
 
105.60 (35.04 ~ 176.16)
 
 
Unkown
4 (100)
0
4 (100)
 
 
 
Histology
 
 
 
0.276
 
0.6013
 
AIS
76 (100)
17 (22.4)
59 (77.6)
0.0063
105.60 (57.93 ~ 153.27)
0.12083
 
Invasive adenocarcinoma
76 (100)
5 (6.6)
71 (93.4)
 
53.10 (NA)
 
 
Squamous cell carcinoma
18 (100)
0
18 (100)
 
NR
 
 
Carcinoid
6 (100)
0
6 (100)
 
NR
 
 
Large
4 (100)
1 (25.0)
3 (75.0)
 
NR
 
 
Others
4 (100)
0
4 (100)
 
 
 
Tumor Size
 
 
 
0.026*
 
 
 
Mean
3.3 ± 1.9
4.1 ± 2.8
3.2 ± 1.7
 
 
 
 
Range
0.5-13.0
0.9-12.0
0.5-13.0
 
 
 
Pathological TNM Classification
 
 
 
 
 
 
pt
pt1
74 (100)
9 (12.2)
65 (87.8)
0.408
105.60 (NA)
0.0915
 
pt2
81 (100)
9 (11.1)
72 (88.9)
 
69.00 (44.22 ~ 93.78)
 
 
pt3
8 (100)
0
8 (100)
 
40.20 (26.06 ~ 54.34)
 
 
pt4
18 (100)
4 (22.2)
14 (77.8)
 
30.50 (NA)
 
 
Unknown
3 (100)
1 (33.3)
2 (66.6)
 
 
 
pn
pn0
144 (100)
18 (12.5)
126 (87.5)
0.924
105.60 (65.68 ~ 145.52)
0.0038
 
pn1
19 (100)
3 (15.8)
16 (84.2)
 
47.80 (32.55 ~ 63.05)
 
 
pn2
17 (100)
2 (11.8)
15 (88.2)
 
45.50 (NA)
 
 
pn3
2 (100)
0
2 (100)
 
5.20 (NA)
 
 
Unknown
2 (100)
0
2 (100)
 
 
 
pm
pm0
171 (100)
20 (11.7)
151(88.3)
0.179
105.60 (55.99 ~ 155.21)
0.2605
 
pm1
12 (100)
3 (25.0)
9 (75.0)
 
56.20 (35.26 ~ 77.14)
 
Pathological Stage
 
 
 
0.426
 
0.0167
 
Stage I
119 (100)
13 (10.9)
106 (89.1)
 
105.60 (65.47 ~ 145.73)
 
 
Stage II
22 (100)
2 (9.1)
20 (90.9)
 
NR
 
 
Stage III
29 (100)
5 (17.2)
24 (82.8)
 
33.60 (0.00 ~ 73.11)
 
 
Stage IV
12 (100)
3 (25.0)
9 (75.0)
 
56.20 (35.26 ~ 77.14)
 
 
Unknown
2 (100)
0
2 (100)
 
 
 
Recurrence
 
 
 
0.435
 
<0.001
 
Yes
63 (100)
6 (9.5)
57 (90.5)
 
39.30 (30.45 ~ 48.15)
 
 
No
103 (100)
14 (13.6)
89 (86.4)
 
NR
 
 Unknown18 (100)1 (5.6)17 (94.4)   

* student t test.

1 between male smoker and male non-smoker.

2 between female smoker and female non-smoker.

3 between AIS and invasive adenocarcinoma.

AIS: adenocarcinoma in situ; NR: not reached; NA: not available.

Characteristics of NSCLC patients in the study cohort * student t test. 1 between male smoker and male non-smoker. 2 between female smoker and female non-smoker. 3 between AIS and invasive adenocarcinoma. AIS: adenocarcinoma in situ; NR: not reached; NA: not available.

Cell lines

NSCLC cell lines A549, A427, H441, H838, H1975, H1650, H322, H358, H1666, H1703, H2170, H460 and H1299, acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cell line CCRF-CEM were obtained from ATCC and cultured as recommended. ALL cell line RCH-ACV was a kind gift from Dr. Mignon Loh (Department of Paediatrics, UCSF).

RNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

Total RNA from cell lines and tissues were extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) according to manufacture’s handbook. Adult normal lung total RNA was purchased at Biochain (CA). 1μg RNA was used for cDNA synthesis (BioRad). 1μL cDNA, 0.2mM for each dNTP, 0.4μM forward (5′-caccagcctcatgcacaa-3′, according to NM_003200 1398-1416) and reverse (5′-tttctccagctccgtatggt-3′, according to NM_002585 605-624) primers, magnesium with final concentration of 2mM, the PCR buffer, Q-solution and 2U Taq enzyme provided (Qiagen) were used in the first round PCR. The reaction cycles were 95°C for 5min, followed by 30 cycles of 95°C 30s, 55°C 30s, 72°C 30s, with final extension of 7min. 1μL PCR product was used in the second round PCR. The conditions were the same except forward primer (5′-gcacaaccacgcggccc-3′, according to NM_003200 1407-1423) and reverse primer (5′-ccacgccttccgctaacagc-3′, according to NM_002585 456-475). PCR products were run on 1.5% agarose gels and dyed with ethidium bromide. GAPDH was used as internal control. Sequencing was performed using PCR primers by Quintara (CA).

DNA extraction and mutation analysis in K-ras, p53 and EGFR

Genomic DNA was extracted from snap-frozen tissue specimens using Qiagen genomic DNA purification kit. Mutations in K-ras codon 12, p53 exons 4-8, EGFR exons 19-21 were analyzed by direct sequencing as previously reported [20-22].

Statistical analysis

The associations between the status of E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts and clinical values were analyzed with Pearson Chi-square test and student t test for category variables and continuous variables, respectively. Median survival, 95% confidence intervals (CI) was calculated by Kaplan-Meier model and the log-rank test. A Cox regression model was used in AIS patients to assess the effects of E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts, adjusted for gender, tumor stage, smoking status, race and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status. All p values reported were from two-sided tests. All analysis was performed by using SPSS 13.0. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered as significant.

Results

Detection of E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts in NSCLC

We performed nested PCR and detected E2A-PBX1 in 23/184 (12.5%) NSCLC patients as well as in positive control (RCH-ACV cell line [23,24]), but not in negative control (CEM cell line [23,24]) or adult normal lung (Figure  1A). For the 23 patients with E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts in their tumor tissues, we did not detect the E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts in their paired adjacent normal tissues (figures not shown). We searched the sequencing results for all the PCR products in NCBI nucleotide/translated nucleotide/protein databases by BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool). The alignments showed that all the products we obtained were human E2A-PBX1 fusion gene with 100% identities. We also detected and confirmed E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts in 3/13 (23.1%) NSCLC cell lines (Figure  1B). Furthermore, we found that all the junction sites in these specimens were the same as that reported by Nourse J, et al. [5] (sequencing examples of the sequence around the junction site in one positive NSCLC tissue sample and cell line were was shown in Figure  1C).
Figure 1

Detection of E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts in NSCLC. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR in NSCLC tissues (A) and cell lines (B). GAPDH was used as internal control. RCH-ACV and CCRF-CEM were regarded as positive (marked by +) and negative (marked by -) controls, respectively. 23 positive specimens (#1-23), 6 selected negative samples (#24-29) and adult normal lung tissue (#30) were shown in (A). (C) Sequencing results of RCH-ACV, H1666 and tissue #1. Partial region around the junction site (indicated by an arrow and a dashed line) was shown. The numbers showed the positions of the sequence according to E2A (NM_003200) and PBX1 (NM_002585) mRNA sequences.

Detection of E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts in NSCLC. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR in NSCLC tissues (A) and cell lines (B). GAPDH was used as internal control. RCH-ACV and CCRF-CEM were regarded as positive (marked by +) and negative (marked by -) controls, respectively. 23 positive specimens (#1-23), 6 selected negative samples (#24-29) and adult normal lung tissue (#30) were shown in (A). (C) Sequencing results of RCH-ACV, H1666 and tissue #1. Partial region around the junction site (indicated by an arrow and a dashed line) was shown. The numbers showed the positions of the sequence according to E2A (NM_003200) and PBX1 (NM_002585) mRNA sequences.

Association of E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts with clinicopathological characteristics of NSCLC patients

We next analyzed association of the expression of E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts and patients’ characteristics (Table  1). Smoking status was not significantly associated with the frequency of E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts in all patients (19/127 (15.0%) in smokers and 4/56 (7.5%) in non-smokers (p = 0.174)), or in male patients (5/59 (8.5%) in smokers and 2/18 (11.1%) in non-smokers (p = 0.733). On the other hand, the frequency of E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts in female smokers (14/68 (20.6%)) was significantly higher than that in female non-smokers (2/35 (5.7%)) (p = 0.048). The odds ratio for female smoker/non-smoker was 4.278, and 95% CI was from 0.914 to 20.026, also suggesting that the expression of E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts correlated with smoking status among female patients with NSCLC. The frequencies of E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts in adenocarcinomas, squamous cell carcinomas, carcinoids and large cell carcinomas were 22/152 (14.5%), 0/18 (0%), 0/6 (0%), 1/4 (25%), respectively (p = 0.276) (Table  1). Interestingly, the frequency of E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts in patients with AIS (17/76 (22.4%)) was significantly higher (p = 0.006) than that in patients with invasive adenocarcinoma (5/76 (6.6%)) (Table  1). The odds ratio for AIS/invasive adenocarcinoma was 4.092, and 95% CI was from 1.424 to 11.753, suggesting significant correlation between the expression of E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts and patients with AIS. Moreover, the mean tumor size in patients with E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts (4.1 ± 2.8cm) was significantly larger than that in patients without E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts (3.2 ± 1.7cm) (p = 0.026) (Table  1). There was no significant association between expression of E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts and age, gender, race, stage, or recurrence status (Table  1).

Association of E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts with overall survival in AIS patients

In our study cohort of patients with AIS, females had significantly better overall survival (OS) than males (p = 0.0378; hazard ratio 0.3647; 95% CI, 0.1395 ~ 0.9532) (Table  2, Figure  2A), consistent with known data [25]. When these AIS patients were grouped by gender and expression of E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts, no significant difference in OS was found between females and males in AIS patients with E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts (p = 0.6401) (Figure  2B). In patients without E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts, however, females had significantly better OS than males (p = 0.0345; hazard ratio 0.2687; 95% CI, 0.07945 ~ 0.9089) (Figure  2C). In addition, Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated an association between expression of E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts and OS by stage. A statistically significant difference in OS was not observed in stage I patients (Figure  2D). OS was significantly better in E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts (-) group than that in E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts (+) group in stage IA patients with AIS (p = 0.0363; hazard ration 0.04104; 95% CI, 0.002065 ~ 0.8157) (Figure  2E) and female stage IA patients with AIS (p = 0.0174; hazard ration 0.02174; 95% CI, 0.0009266 ~ 0.5100) (Figure  2F). A multivariate analysis also showed that the status of E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts (P = 0.050; hazard ratio 3.447; 95% CI, 1.002 ~ 11.857), gender (p = 0.005; hazard ratio 0.212; 95% CI, 0.071 ~ 0.628) and stage IA (p = 0.004; hazard ratio 0.011; 95% CI, 0.001 ~ 0.237) were significantly associated with overall survival.
Table 2

Overall survival analysis in AIS patients and subgroups

GroupGenderE2A-PBX1 statusPatient numberMedian survival (months)95% CIP value
AIS patients
Female
 
53
105.60
63.95 ~ 147.25
0.0378
 
Male
 
23
56.20
22.34 ~ 90.06
 
AIS patients with E2A-PBX1
Female
 
12
56.20
37.46 ~ 74.94
0.6401
 
Male
 
5
56.20
0.00 ~ 122.80
 
AIS patients without E2A-PBX1
Female
 
41
105.60
63.45 ~ 147.75
0.0345
 
Male
 
18
NR
NA
 
AIS patients
 
+
17
56.20
44.37 ~ 68.03
0.1235
 
 
-
59
105.60
63.95 ~ 147.25
 
AIS stage I patients
 
+
10
56.20
38.38 ~ 74.02
0.1753
 
 
-
41
105.60
63.65 ~ 147.55
 
AIS female patients
 
+
12
56.20
37.46 ~ 74.94
0.0747
 
 
-
41
105.60
63.45 ~ 147.75
 
AIS stage IA patients
 
+
6
NR
NA
0.0363
 
 
-
18
NR
NA
 
AIS stage IA female patients
 
+
4
46.70
8.77 ~ 84.63
0.0174
  -13105.60NA 

NR: not reached; NA: not available.

Figure 2

Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival in AIS patients. (A) 76 AIS patients, (B) 17 AIS patients with E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts, (C) 59 AIS patients without E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts, (D) 51 AIS patients at stage I, (E) 24 AIS patients at stage IA, and (F) 17 AIS female patients at stage IA. The patients were grouped by either gender (in panels A, B and C) or the status of E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts (in panels D, E, and F).

Overall survival analysis in AIS patients and subgroups NR: not reached; NA: not available. Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival in AIS patients. (A) 76 AIS patients, (B) 17 AIS patients with E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts, (C) 59 AIS patients without E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts, (D) 51 AIS patients at stage I, (E) 24 AIS patients at stage IA, and (F) 17 AIS female patients at stage IA. The patients were grouped by either gender (in panels A, B and C) or the status of E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts (in panels D, E, and F).

E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts as a potential genetic biomarker in AIS

Mutations in K-ras, p53 and EGFR are commonly found in NSCLC [16-18]. We next screened for mutations in codon 12 of K-ras, exons 4-8 of p53, and exons 19-21 of EGFR in the specimens form patients with expression of E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts. We also compared the status of E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts and mutation status of K-ras, p53 and EGFR in the NSCLC cell lines used in our study (mutation information was obtained from The COSMIC (Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer) database and website [25]) (Table  3 and Table  4). 8 of these 22 (36.4%) patients with E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts had K-ras mutations; 3 of the 22 (13.6%) patients had p53 mutations; only 1 of the 22 (4.5%) patient had EGFR mutation. K-ras and EGFR mutations in these patients were mutually exclusive to each other, same as previously reporeted [26]. Notably, 12 of the 22 (54.5%) patients had none of these three common mutations in lung cancer (Table  3 and Table  4). This subgroup of patients included all four non-smokers (patient # 4, 8, 13 and 22) and 8 stage I patients with AIS (Table  3). Among all thirteen NSCLC cell lines that we examined, only H1666 that was derived from a female patient with BAC (non-smoker) had no mutations in K-ras, p53 and EGFR (Note: the histology information of H1666 from ATCC still uses BAC). Taken together, our results suggest that the E2A-PBX1 fusion gene may be a genetic biomarker in NSCLC, especially in its subtype AIS.
Table 3

Mutational analysis of K-ras, p53 and EGFR in NSCLC patients with E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts and NSCLC cell lines

#E2A-PBX1k-Kras codon 12p53EGFRAgeGenderRaceSmoking statusStageHistology
2
+
 
 
 
67
M
Middle Eastern
S
IIIB
Adc
12
+
 
 
 
72
F
Hispanic
S
IB
Adc
14
+
 
 
 
66
F
Caucasian
S
IIB
Adc
18
+
G12V
 
 
78
F
Caucasian
S
IB
Adc
20
+
G12C
 
 
63
F
Caucasian
S
IV
Adc
1
+
 
 
 
71
F
Caucasian
S
IA
AIS
3
+
 
 
 
41
M
Caucasian
S
IV
AIS
8
+
 
 
 
59
M
Caucasian
NS
IB
AIS
9
+
 
 
 
73
F
Caucasian
S
IIIB
AIS
11
+
 
 
 
84
M
Caucasian
S
IA
AIS
13
+
 
 
 
61
F
South Asian
NS
IB
AIS
21
+
 
 
 
82
F
Caucasian
S
IA
AIS
22
+
 
 
 
48
F
East Asian
NS
IB
AIS
16
+
 
G245S
 
63
F
Caucasian
S
IA
AIS
7
+
 
V272M
L858R
73
F
Caucasian
S
IIIB
AIS
6
+
G12C
 
 
68
M
Southeast Asian
S
IIIA
AIS
10
+
G12C
 
 
71
M
Hispanic
S
IA
AIS
17
+
G12C
 
 
67
F
Caucasian
S
IB
AIS
19
+
G12C
 
 
79
F
Caucasian
S
IIA
AIS
5
+
G12A
 
 
54
F
Caucasian
S
IIIB
AIS
15
+
G12V
exon 7(FS)
 
67
F
Caucasian
S
IV
AIS
4
+
 
 
 
39
M
Caucasian
NS
IB
LCC
23
+
ND
72
F
Caucasian
S
IA
AIS
 
 
Cell line
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
A549
+
G12S
 
 
58
M
Caucasian
 
 
Adc
A427
+
G12D
 
 
52
M
Caucasian
 
 
Adc
H441
-
G12V
R158L
 
 
M
 
 
 
Adc
H838
-
 
 
 
59
M
Caucasian
S
IIIB
Adc
H1975
-
 
R273H
L858R, T790M
 
F
 
NS
 
Adc
H1650
-
 
 
Exon 19 deletion
27
M
Caucasian
S
IIIB
Adc
H322
-
 
R248L
 
52
M
Caucasian
 
 
BAC
H358
-
G12C
Null
 
 
M
Caucasian
 
 
BAC
H1666
+
 
 
 
50
F
Caucasian
NS
III?
BAC
H2170
-
 
R158G
 
 
M
 
NS
 
Sqc
H1703
-
 
E285K
 
54
M
Caucasian
S
I
Sqc
H460
-
Q61H
 
 
 
M
 
 
 
LCC
H1299- Null 43MCaucasian  LCC

FS: frame shift; M: male; F: female; S: smoker; NS: non-smoker; Adc: adenocarcinoma; AIS: adenocarcinoma in situ; BAC: brochioloalveolar carcinoma (histology information from ATCC still uses BAC); LCC: large cell carcinoma; Sqc: squamous carcinoma; ND: not determined.

Table 4

Summary of mutational analysis in NSCLC patients with E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts

  Total (%)K-P-E-K + P-E-K-P + E-K + P + E-K-P + E+K-P-E+K + P-E+K + P + E+
Total
 
22 (100)
12 (54.5)
7 (31.8)
1 (4.5)
1 (4.5)
1 (4.5)
 
 
 
Gender
F
15 (100)
7 (46.7)
5 (33.3)
1 (6.7)
1 (6.7)
1 (6.7)
 
 
 
 
M
7 (100)
5 (71.4)
2 (28.6)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Race
Caucasian
16 (100)
8 (50.0)
5 (31.3)
1 (6.3)
1 (6.3)
1 (6.3)
 
 
 
 
Asian
3 (100)
2 (66.7)
1 (33.3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Middle eastern
1 (100)
1 (100)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hispanic
2 (100)
1(50.0)
1 (50.0)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Smoking status
NS
4 (100)
4 (100)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
S
18 (100)
8 (44.4)
7 (38.9)
1 (5.6)
1 (5.6)
1 (5.6)
 
 
 
Stage
I
12 (100)
8 (66.7)
3 (25.0)
1 (8.3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
II
2 (100)
1 (50.0)
1 (50.0)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
III
5 (100)
2 (40.0)
2 (40.0)
 
 
1 (20.0)
 
 
 
 
IV
3 (100)
1 (33.3)
1 (33.3)
 
1 (33.3)
 
 
 
 
Histology
AIS
16 (100)
8 (50.0)
5 (31.3)
1 (6.3)
1 (6.3)
1 (6.3)
 
 
 
 
Invasive Adc
5 (100)
3 (60.0)
2 (40.0)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 LCC1 (100)1 (100)       

K: k-ras codon 12; P: p53 exons 4-8; E: EGFR exons 19-21.

Mutational analysis of K-ras, p53 and EGFR in NSCLC patients with E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts and NSCLC cell lines FS: frame shift; M: male; F: female; S: smoker; NS: non-smoker; Adc: adenocarcinoma; AIS: adenocarcinoma in situ; BAC: brochioloalveolar carcinoma (histology information from ATCC still uses BAC); LCC: large cell carcinoma; Sqc: squamous carcinoma; ND: not determined. Summary of mutational analysis in NSCLC patients with E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts K: k-ras codon 12; P: p53 exons 4-8; E: EGFR exons 19-21.

Discussion

Somatic genetic changes have been believed to play important roles in human tumorigenesis, but the cancer type in which somatic rearrangement occurs is limited to leukemias, lymphomas and soft tissue tumors [2]. Overexpression of Notch3 was found to be associated with chromosome 19 translocation in lung cancer [27]. EML4-ALK fusion gene [28] and ETS fusion genes [29,30] exist in NSCLC and prostate cancer, respectively. It is still unclear whether chromosome aberrations are important in the initiation of epithelial tumorigenesis. AIS (formerly named BAC) is a subset of adenocarcinoma characterized by non-invasive growth along alveolar septae [19,25]. It is more prevalent in women, non-smokers, and Asians [25]. Despite the lack of stromal, vascular, or pleural invasion, AIS is malignant and surgical resection is currently the mainstay of curative treatment. We previously discussed about a multi-step model of lung cancer development, especially AIS as carcinoma in situ [31]. Genetic changes can sequentially accumulate and cause bronchioalveolar stem cells to transform, leading to development of invasive phenotype in human cancers. However, it is unclear what is the cause for transformation of atypical bronchioloalveolar cells into invasive adenocarcinoma or maintenance for the growth characterization in AIS. Several important players such as K-ras, p53, and survivin, etc. have been considered as tumor markers in AIS progression into invasive cancer [16-18,25], few are specific to AIS and “driver mutations” for AIS progression are still unidentified. Here in this study, we reported in NSCLC the expression of E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts that have been well documented in leukemias [5-15]. This is the first report of detection of the E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts in solid tumors. More interestingly, we observed that the E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts were more frequently found in AIS than other subtypes of NSCLC, and the presence of E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts were significantly associated with decreased overall survival in female and stage IA patients with AIS. These results suggest that the E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts may play a critical role in AIS progression, especially for females and non-smokers. Supportive evidence also comes from our analysis of mutations in K-ras, p53 and EGFR that are common in NSCLC and considered as “driver mutations” [16-18]. Comparison of the mutational status of these genes in patients expressing the E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts showed that approximately 55% patients examined in our study cohort were wild type in K-ras, p53 and EGFR. Majority of this subgroup were patients with AIS including all four non-smokers. Because E2A-PBX1 onco-protein has been proved to exhibit transformation potentials by transcribing target genes [5-15], we argue that E2A-PBX1 may serve as one “driver mutation” in AIS and play critical roles during initiation and progression of at least a subset of AIS. E2A-PBX1 may represent a new therapeutic target for NSCLC, especially AIS. Further investigation is needed to evaluate the function of E2A-PBX1 fusion protein, as well as its therapeutic and prognostic values and its correlation with treatment resistance in AIS. In this study, we only examined in NSCLC specimens the conserved E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts that are well documented in leukemias [5-15]. It is possible that other forms of E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts also exist in NSCLC. TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) data may be useful to analyze the frequency of E2A-PBX1 fusion transcriptions in NSCLC. Another limitation of this study is relatively small number of AIS specimens analyzed. Analysis of an independent large cohort of AIS is needed to validate our observation.

Conclusions

Our data demonstrated the presence of E2A-PBX1 fusion transcripts caused by t(1;19)(q23;p13) in lung adenocarcinomas, especially AIS. It may be a common genetic change in AIS and a survival determinant for female AIS patients at early stage. These data may be of significant clinical importance, because finding reliable genetic biomarkers for early-stage lung adenocarcinomas including AIS is becoming increasingly apparent for early identification and management of this deadly disease.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this report and any accompanying images.

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

MLM carried out the RNA extraction, primer design and PCR. TH carried out the DNA extraction and sequencing analysis. ZC and HL performed the statistical analysis. DJ participated in the design of the study. HMZ and BH conceived of the study, and participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
  31 in total

1.  Recurrent fusion of TMPRSS2 and ETS transcription factor genes in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Scott A Tomlins; Daniel R Rhodes; Sven Perner; Saravana M Dhanasekaran; Rohit Mehra; Xiao-Wei Sun; Sooryanarayana Varambally; Xuhong Cao; Joelle Tchinda; Rainer Kuefer; Charles Lee; James E Montie; Rajal B Shah; Kenneth J Pienta; Mark A Rubin; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Current concepts in bronchioloalveolar carcinoma biology.

Authors:  Dan J Raz; Biao He; Rafael Rosell; David M Jablons
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Inhibition of Wnt16 in human acute lymphoblastoid leukemia cells containing the t(1;19) translocation induces apoptosis.

Authors:  Julien Mazieres; Liang You; Biao He; Zhidong Xu; Amie Y Lee; Iwao Mikami; Frank McCormick; David M Jablons
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  Lung adenocarcinoma harboring mutations in the ERBB2 kinase domain.

Authors:  Makoto Sonobe; Toshiaki Manabe; Hiromi Wada; Fumihiro Tanaka
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.568

5.  A novel fibroblast growth factor gene expressed in the developing nervous system is a downstream target of the chimeric homeodomain oncoprotein E2A-Pbx1.

Authors:  J R McWhirter; M Goulding; J A Weiner; J Chun; C Murre
Journal:  Development       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.868

6.  Patterns of EGFR, HER2, TP53, and KRAS mutations of p14arf expression in non-small cell lung cancers in relation to smoking history.

Authors:  Mounia Mounawar; Anush Mukeria; Florence Le Calvez; Rayjean J Hung; Helene Renard; Alexis Cortot; Claire Bollart; David Zaridze; Paul Brennan; Paolo Boffetta; Elisabeth Brambilla; Pierre Hainaut
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Somatic mutations of the HER2 kinase domain in lung adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Hisayuki Shigematsu; Takao Takahashi; Masaharu Nomura; Kuntal Majmudar; Makoto Suzuki; Huei Lee; Ignacio I Wistuba; Kwun M Fong; Shinichi Toyooka; Nobuyoshi Shimizu; Takehiko Fujisawa; John D Minna; Adi F Gazdar
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  A TP53-truncating germline mutation (E287X) in a family with characteristics of both hereditary diffuse gastric cancer and Li-Fraumeni syndrome.

Authors:  Il-Jin Kim; Hio Chung Kang; Yong Shin; Hye-Won Park; Sang-Geun Jang; Song-Yee Han; Sun-Kyung Lim; Min Ro Lee; Hee Jin Chang; Ja-Lok Ku; Han-Kwang Yang; Jae-Gahb Park
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-09-10       Impact factor: 3.172

9.  K-ras point mutation occurs in the early stage of carcinogenesis in lung cancer.

Authors:  M Sagawa; Y Saito; S Fujimura; R I Linnoila
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor gene are linked to smoking-independent, lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  M Sonobe; T Manabe; H Wada; F Tanaka
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Personalizing therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Liza C Villaruz; Timothy F Burns; Vasilis S Ramfidis; Mark A Socinski
Journal:  Semin Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.119

Review 2.  HOX genes and their role in the development of human cancers.

Authors:  Seema Bhatlekar; Jeremy Z Fields; Bruce M Boman
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  Expressional profiles of transcription factors in the progression of Helicobacter pylori-associated gastric carcinoma based on protein/DNA array analysis.

Authors:  Ting-Zi Hu; Li-Hua Huang; Can-Xia Xu; Xiao-Ming Liu; Yu Wang; Jing Xiao; Li Zhou; Ling Luo; Xiao-Xia Jiang
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Sites of instability in the human TCF3 (E2A) gene adopt G-quadruplex DNA structures in vitro.

Authors:  Jonathan D Williams; Sara Fleetwood; Alexandra Berroyer; Nayun Kim; Erik D Larson
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  E2A predicts prognosis of colorectal cancer patients and regulates cancer cell growth by targeting miR-320a.

Authors:  Ao Huang; Hongchao Zhao; Yingjun Quan; Runsen Jin; Bo Feng; Minhua Zheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  In silico identification of potential key regulatory factors in smoking-induced lung cancer.

Authors:  Salem A El-Aarag; Amal Mahmoud; Medhat H Hashem; Hatem Abd Elkader; Alaa E Hemeida; Mahmoud ElHefnawi
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.063

7.  Identifying General Tumor and Specific Lung Cancer Biomarkers by Transcriptomic Analysis.

Authors:  Beatriz Andrea Otálora-Otálora; Daniel Alejandro Osuna-Garzón; Michael Steven Carvajal-Parra; Alejandra Cañas; Martín Montecino; Liliana López-Kleine; Adriana Rojas
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-20

8.  Whole-exome sequencing and bioinformatics analysis of a case of non-alpha-fetoprotein-elevated lung hepatoid adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yao Yao; Xiaojiao Guan; Guangyao Bao; Jie Liang; Tian Li; Xinwen Zhong
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 5.988

9.  Control of asymmetric Hopfield networks and application to cancer attractors.

Authors:  Anthony Szedlak; Giovanni Paternostro; Carlo Piermarocchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.