OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To find an anatomical measurement of the cleft palate (or a calculated parameter) that predicts the occurrence of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) after palatal cleft repair. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Charts were reviewed from cleft palate patients who underwent palatoplasty by the Von Langenbeck technique for isolated cleft palate or Bardach two-flap palatoplasty for cleft lip-palate. Seven anatomical cleft parameters were prospectively measured during the palatoplasty procedure. Three blinded speech-language pathologists retrospectively scored the clinically assessed VPI at 4 years of age. The recommendation of pharyngoplasty was also used as an indicator of VPI. RESULTS: From 1993 to 2008, 67 patients were enrolled in the study. The best predicting parameter was the ratio a/(30 - b1), in which a is defined as the posterior gap between the soft palate and the posterior pharyngeal wall and b1 is the width of the cleft at the hard palate level. An a/(30 - b1) ratio >0.7 to 0.8 is associated with a higher risk of developing VPI (relative risk = 2.2-5.1, sensitivity = 72%-81%, P < .03). CONCLUSIONS: The width of the cleft at the hard palate level and the posterior gap between the soft palate and the posterior pharyngeal wall were found to be the most significant parameters in predicting VPI. The best correlation was obtained with the ratio a/(30 - b1). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To find an anatomical measurement of the cleft palate (or a calculated parameter) that predicts the occurrence of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) after palatal cleft repair. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Charts were reviewed from cleft palatepatients who underwent palatoplasty by the Von Langenbeck technique for isolated cleft palate or Bardach two-flap palatoplasty for cleft lip-palate. Seven anatomical cleft parameters were prospectively measured during the palatoplasty procedure. Three blinded speech-language pathologists retrospectively scored the clinically assessed VPI at 4 years of age. The recommendation of pharyngoplasty was also used as an indicator of VPI. RESULTS: From 1993 to 2008, 67 patients were enrolled in the study. The best predicting parameter was the ratio a/(30 - b1), in which a is defined as the posterior gap between the soft palate and the posterior pharyngeal wall and b1 is the width of the cleft at the hard palate level. An a/(30 - b1) ratio >0.7 to 0.8 is associated with a higher risk of developing VPI (relative risk = 2.2-5.1, sensitivity = 72%-81%, P < .03). CONCLUSIONS: The width of the cleft at the hard palate level and the posterior gap between the soft palate and the posterior pharyngeal wall were found to be the most significant parameters in predicting VPI. The best correlation was obtained with the ratio a/(30 - b1). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
Authors: Robrecht J H Logjes; Susanna Upton; Bryce A Mendelsohn; Ryan K Badiee; Corstiaan C Breugem; William Y Hoffman; Jason H Pomerantz Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2021-01-21
Authors: Isabelle Francisca Petronella Maria Kappen; Dirk Bittermann; Laura Janssen; Gerhard Koendert Pieter Bittermann; Chantal Boonacker; Sarah Haverkamp; Hester de Wilde; Marise Van Der Heul; Tom Fjmc Specken; Ron Koole; Moshe Kon; Corstiaan Cornelis Breugem; Aebele Barber Mink van der Molen Journal: Arch Plast Surg Date: 2017-05-22