AIM: To compare the 24-h intraocular pressure (IOP) control obtained with the bimatoprost-timolol fixed combination (BTFC) versus latanoprost in newly diagnosed, previously untreated exfoliation syndrome (XFS) or exfoliative glaucoma (XFG) patients with baseline morning IOP greater than 29 mm Hg. METHODS:One eye of 41 XFS/XFG patients who met inclusion criteria was included in this prospective, observer-masked, crossover, comparison protocol. All subjects underwent a 24-h untreated curve and were then randomised to either evening administered BTFC or latanoprost for 3 months and then switched to the opposite therapy. At the end of each treatment period, patients underwent a treated 24-h IOP assessment. RESULTS:37 patients completed the trial. At baseline, mean untreated 24-h IOP was 31.1 mm Hg. Mean24-h IOP with BTFC was significantly lower than with latanoprost (18.9 vs 21.2 mm Hg; p<0.001). Furthermore, BTFC reduced IOP significantly more than latanoprost at every time point, for the mean peak and trough 24-h IOP (p<0.001). There was no difference, however, in mean 24-h IOP fluctuation between the two medications (3.8 with BTFC vs 4.2 with latanoprost; p=0.161). Both treatments were well tolerated and there was no statistically significant difference for any adverse event between them. CONCLUSIONS: As first choice therapy in high-pressure, at-risk exfoliation patients, BTFC controlled mean 24-h IOP significantly better than latanoprost monotherapy.
RCT Entities:
AIM: To compare the 24-h intraocular pressure (IOP) control obtained with the bimatoprost-timolol fixed combination (BTFC) versus latanoprost in newly diagnosed, previously untreated exfoliation syndrome (XFS) or exfoliative glaucoma (XFG) patients with baseline morning IOP greater than 29 mm Hg. METHODS: One eye of 41 XFS/XFGpatients who met inclusion criteria was included in this prospective, observer-masked, crossover, comparison protocol. All subjects underwent a 24-h untreated curve and were then randomised to either evening administered BTFC or latanoprost for 3 months and then switched to the opposite therapy. At the end of each treatment period, patients underwent a treated 24-h IOP assessment. RESULTS: 37 patients completed the trial. At baseline, mean untreated 24-h IOP was 31.1 mm Hg. Mean 24-h IOP with BTFC was significantly lower than with latanoprost (18.9 vs 21.2 mm Hg; p<0.001). Furthermore, BTFC reduced IOP significantly more than latanoprost at every time point, for the mean peak and trough 24-h IOP (p<0.001). There was no difference, however, in mean 24-h IOP fluctuation between the two medications (3.8 with BTFC vs 4.2 with latanoprost; p=0.161). Both treatments were well tolerated and there was no statistically significant difference for any adverse event between them. CONCLUSIONS: As first choice therapy in high-pressure, at-risk exfoliation patients, BTFC controlled mean 24-h IOP significantly better than latanoprost monotherapy.
Entities:
Keywords:
Glaucoma; Intraocular pressure; Treatment Medical