Literature DB >> 23685643

Whole-body nanoparticle aerosol inhalation exposures.

Jinghai Yi1, Bean T Chen, Diane Schwegler-Berry, Dave Frazer, Vince Castranova, Carroll McBride, Travis L Knuckles, Phoebe A Stapleton, Valerie C Minarchick, Timothy R Nurkiewicz.   

Abstract

Inhalation is the most likely exposure route for individuals working with aerosolizable engineered nano-materials (ENM). To properly perform nanoparticle inhalation toxicology studies, the aerosols in a chamber housing the experimental animals must have: 1) a steady concentration maintained at a desired level for the entire exposure period; 2) a homogenous composition free of contaminants; and 3) a stable size distribution with a geometric mean diameter < 200 nm and a geometric standard deviation σg < 2.5 (5). The generation of aerosols containing nanoparticles is quite challenging because nanoparticles easily agglomerate. This is largely due to very strong inter-particle forces and the formation of large fractal structures in tens or hundreds of microns in size (6), which are difficult to be broken up. Several common aerosol generators, including nebulizers, fluidized beds, Venturi aspirators and the Wright dust feed, were tested; however, none were able to produce nanoparticle aerosols which satisfy all criteria (5). A whole-body nanoparticle aerosol inhalation exposure system was fabricated, validated and utilized for nano-TiO2 inhalation toxicology studies. Critical components: 1) novel nano-TiO2 aerosol generator; 2) 0.5 m(3) whole-body inhalation exposure chamber; and 3) monitor and control system. Nano-TiO2 aerosols generated from bulk dry nano-TiO2 powders (primary diameter of 21 nm, bulk density of 3.8 g/cm(3)) were delivered into the exposure chamber at a flow rate of 90 LPM (10.8 air changes/hr). Particle size distribution and mass concentration profiles were measured continuously with a scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS), and an electric low pressure impactor (ELPI). The aerosol mass concentration (C) was verified gravimetrically (mg/m(3)). The mass (M) of the collected particles was determined as M = (Mpost-Mpre), where Mpre and Mpost are masses of the filter before and after sampling (mg). The mass concentration was calculated as C = M/(Q*t), where Q is sampling flowrate (m(3)/min), and t is the sampling time (minute). The chamber pressure, temperature, relative humidity (RH), O2 and CO2 concentrations were monitored and controlled continuously. Nano-TiO2 aerosols collected on Nuclepore filters were analyzed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis. In summary, we report that the nano-particle aerosols generated and delivered to our exposure chamber have: 1) steady mass concentration; 2) homogenous composition free of contaminants; 3) stable particle size distributions with a count-median aerodynamic diameter of 157 nm during aerosol generation. This system reliably and repeatedly creates test atmospheres that simulate occupational, environmental or domestic ENM aerosol exposures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23685643      PMCID: PMC3679583          DOI: 10.3791/50263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  6 in total

1.  Automated feedback control of an inhalation exposure system with discrete sampling intervals: testing, performance, and modeling.

Authors:  Brian A Wong
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.724

2.  Nanoparticle inhalation alters systemic arteriolar vasoreactivity through sympathetic and cyclooxygenase-mediated pathways.

Authors:  Travis L Knuckles; Jinghai Yi; David G Frazer; Howard D Leonard; Bean T Chen; Vince Castranova; Timothy R Nurkiewicz
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 5.913

Review 3.  Inhalation exposure systems: design, methods and operation.

Authors:  Brian A Wong
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.902

4.  Measurement of the respiratory volumes of laboratory animals.

Authors:  A C GUYTON
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1947-07-01

5.  Repeated 4-week inhalation exposure of rats: effect of low-, intermediate, and high-humidity chamber atmospheres.

Authors:  J Pauluhn; U Mohr
Journal:  Exp Toxicol Pathol       Date:  1999-02

6.  Allometric respiration/body mass data for animals to be used for estimates of inhalation toxicity to young adult humans.

Authors:  R W Bide; S J Armour; E Yee
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.446

  6 in total
  22 in total

1.  Maternal titanium dioxide nanomaterial inhalation exposure compromises placental hemodynamics.

Authors:  Alaeddin B Abukabda; Elizabeth C Bowdridge; Carroll R McBride; Thomas P Batchelor; William T Goldsmith; Krista L Garner; Sherri Friend; Timothy R Nurkiewicz
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.219

2.  Characterization of chemical contaminants generated by a desktop fused deposition modeling 3-dimensional Printer.

Authors:  Aleksandr B Stefaniak; Ryan F LeBouf; Jinghai Yi; Jason Ham; Timothy Nurkewicz; Diane E Schwegler-Berry; Bean T Chen; J Raymond Wells; Matthew G Duling; Robert B Lawrence; Stephen B Martin; Alyson R Johnson; M Abbas Virji
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Inhalation exposure to three-dimensional printer emissions stimulates acute hypertension and microvascular dysfunction.

Authors:  A B Stefaniak; R F LeBouf; M G Duling; J Yi; A B Abukabda; C R McBride; T R Nurkiewicz
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 4.219

4.  Maternal Engineered Nanomaterial Inhalation During Gestation Disrupts Vascular Kisspeptin Reactivity.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Bowdridge; Alaeddin B Abukabda; Kevin J Engles; Carroll R McBride; Thomas P Batchelor; William T Goldsmith; Krista L Garner; Sherri Friend; Timothy R Nurkiewicz
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Uterine microvascular sensitivity to nanomaterial inhalation: An in vivo assessment.

Authors:  P A Stapleton; C R McBride; J Yi; T R Nurkiewicz
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 4.219

6.  Comparative plasma proteomic studies of pulmonary TiO2 nanoparticle exposure in rats using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Megan M Maurer; Gregory C Donohoe; Hossein Maleki; Jinghai Yi; Carroll McBride; Timothy R Nurkiewicz; Stephen J Valentine
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  Microvascular and mitochondrial dysfunction in the female F1 generation after gestational TiO2 nanoparticle exposure.

Authors:  Phoebe A Stapleton; Cody E Nichols; Jinghai Yi; Carroll R McBride; Valerie C Minarchick; Danielle L Shepherd; John M Hollander; Timothy R Nurkiewicz
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 5.913

8.  Impacts of prenatal nanomaterial exposure on male adult Sprague-Dawley rat behavior and cognition.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Engler-Chiurazzi; Phoebe A Stapleton; Jessica J Stalnaker; Xuefang Ren; Heng Hu; Timothy R Nurkiewicz; Carroll R McBride; Jinghai Yi; Kevin Engels; James W Simpkins
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2016-04-19

9.  Reactive oxygen species damage drives cardiac and mitochondrial dysfunction following acute nano-titanium dioxide inhalation exposure.

Authors:  Cody E Nichols; Danielle L Shepherd; Quincy A Hathaway; Andrya J Durr; Dharendra Thapa; Alaeddin Abukabda; Jinghai Yi; Timothy R Nurkiewicz; John M Hollander
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 5.913

10.  Maternal engineered nanomaterial exposure and fetal microvascular function: does the Barker hypothesis apply?

Authors:  Phoebe A Stapleton; Valerie C Minarchick; Jinghai Yi; Kevin Engels; Carroll R McBride; Timothy R Nurkiewicz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.