Literature DB >> 23685498

[Clubfoot treatment through the ages: the Ponseti method in comparison to other conservative approaches and operative procedures].

H Delbrück1, M Schaltenbrand, S Schröder, M Rauschmann, C Schwenninger.   

Abstract

Clubfoot is one of the most common congenital deformities of the musculoskeletal system with incidence rates ranging from 0.6 to 6.8 per 1,000 live births. The treatment of clubfoot historically belongs to one of the oldest orthopedic therapies. By the end of the nineteenth century redressement with various tools, such as clamps, braces and casts was the standard treatment of clubfoot. Through further development of operational capabilities and the fact that soft tissue structures show amore resistant reaction to pressure and strain than the surrounding cartilage and bone, operative therapy was favored in the late twentieth century. Surgical correction involves the release of contracted capsular and ligamentous structures to varying degrees and the lengthening of tendons.In 1963 Ponseti published his method. He recognized that the internal rotation and plantar flexion of the calcaneus is the key deformity. However, his method first became known worldwide at the turn of the millennium as long-term results of release operations showed stiff scar healing and the risk of over-correction as problems in these operations.Many comparative studies have shown the superiority of the Ponseti method regarding invasiveness, primary correction rate, functional outcome and recurrence rate in both idiopathic and non-idiopathic clubfoot. In this article the current literature regarding this will be presented as well as prominent landmarks in the development of clubfoot treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23685498     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-012-1989-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  51 in total

1.  Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot: an historical review.

Authors:  M B Dobbs; J A Morcuende; C A Gurnett; I V Ponseti
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2000

2.  Principles involved in the treatment of congenital club-foot. 1939.

Authors:  J H Kite
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Current management of idiopathic clubfoot questionnaire: a multicentric study.

Authors:  Michael R Heilig; Richard V Matern; Seth D Rosenzweig; James T Bennett
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.324

4.  Initial severity rating of idiopathic clubfeet is an outcome predictor at age two years.

Authors:  Wanglin Zhang; Benjamin Stephens Richards; Shawne T Faulks; Lori A Karol; Karl A Rathjen; Richard H Browne
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 5.  Genetics of clubfoot.

Authors:  Matthew B Dobbs; Christina A Gurnett
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 6.  [Early functional treatment of congenital clubfoot].

Authors:  Y P Charles; F Canavese; A Diméglio
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Ponseti method compared with surgical treatment of clubfoot: a prospective comparison.

Authors:  Matthew A Halanski; Jan E Davison; Jen-Chen Huang; Cameron G Walker; Stewart J Walsh; Haemish A Crawford
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Long-term results of treatment of congenital club foot.

Authors:  S J Laaveg; I V Ponseti
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Radical reduction in the rate of extensive corrective surgery for clubfoot using the Ponseti method.

Authors:  Jose A Morcuende; Lori A Dolan; Frederick R Dietz; Ignacio V Ponseti
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  A comparison of two nonoperative methods of idiopathic clubfoot correction: the Ponseti method and the French functional (physiotherapy) method.

Authors:  B Stephens Richards; Shawne Faulks; Karl E Rathjen; Lori A Karol; Charles E Johnston; Sarah A Jones
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Relapsing and residual clubfoot deformities after the application of the ponseti method: a contemporary review.

Authors:  Ali Parsa; Mohammad Hallaj Moghadam; Mohammad H Taraz Jamshidi
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2014-03-15

2.  Kite versus Ponseti Method in the Treatment of 235 Feet With Idiopathic Clubfoot: Results of a Single Romanian Medical Center.

Authors:  Zoltan Derzsi; Örs Nagy; Horea Gozar; Simona Gurzu; Tudor Sorin Pop
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.817

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.