Literature DB >> 23685298

A randomised comparison of a novel abluminal groove-filled biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent with a durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: clinical and angiographic follow-up of the TARGET I trial.

Run-Lin Gao1, Bo Xu, Alexandra J Lansky, Yue-Jin Yang, Chang-Sheng Ma, Ya-Ling Han, Shao-Liang Chen, Hui Li, Rui-Yan Zhang, Guo-Sheng Fu, Zu-Yi Yuan, Hong Jiang, Yong Huo, Wei Li, Yao-Jun Zhang, Martin B Leon.   

Abstract

AIMS: The study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of FIREHAWK, a novel abluminal groove-filled biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) for treating patients with single de novo coronary lesions compared with the durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (EES) XIENCE V. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A total of 458 patients with single de novo native coronary lesions ≤24 mm in length and a coronary artery ≥2.25 to ≤4.0 mm in diameter were enrolled in the TARGET I study, a prospective, randomised, non-inferiority trial. The primary endpoint was in-stent late lumen loss (LLL) at nine-month follow-up. The secondary endpoint, target lesion failure (TLF), was defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), or ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation (iTLR). Patients were centrally randomised to treatment with either biodegradable polymer SES (n=227) or durable polymer EES (n=231). The nine-month in-stent LLL of the biodegradable polymer SES was comparable to the EES group (0.13 ± 0.24 mm vs. 0.13 ± 0.18 mm, p=0.94; difference and 95% confidence interval 0.00 [-0.04, 0.04] mm; p for non-inferiority <0.0001). Cardiac death (0.4% vs. 0.0%), TVMI (1.3% vs. 1.7%), iTLR (0.4% vs. 0.4%) and TLF (2.2% vs. 2.2%) were similar between the biodegradable polymer SES and durable polymer EES groups at 12-month follow-up (all p>0.05). No definite/probable stent thrombosis was observed in both of these groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In the multicentre TARGET I trial, the novel abluminal groove-filled biodegradable polymer SES FIREHAWK was non-inferior to the durable polymer EES XIENCE V with respect to the primary endpoint of in-stent LLL at nine months for treating patients with single de novo coronary lesions. The incidences of clinical endpoints were low in both of the stents at 12-month follow-up. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01196819).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23685298     DOI: 10.4244/EIJV9I1A12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  17 in total

1.  Biodegradable polymer stents vs second generation drug eluting stents: A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Bhavi Pandya; Sainath Gaddam; Muhammad Raza; Deepak Asti; Nikhil Nalluri; Thomas Vazzana; Ruben Kandov; James Lafferty
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-26

Review 2.  Endovascular Drug Delivery and Drug Elution Systems: First Principles.

Authors:  Abraham Rami Tzafriri; Elazer Reuven Edelman
Journal:  Interv Cardiol Clin       Date:  2016-06-21

3.  Comparison of long-term in-stent vascular response between abluminal groove-filled biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent and durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: 3-year OCT follow-up from the TARGET I trial.

Authors:  Bo Xu; Yao-Jun Zhang; Zhong-Wei Sun; Shu-Bin Qiao; Shao-Liang Chen; Rui-Yan Zhang; Dao-Rong Pan; Si Pang; Qi Zhang; Liang Xu; Yue-Jin Yang; Martin B Leon; Run-Lin Gao
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Osstem Cardiotec Centum Stent Versus Xience Alpine Stent for De Novo Coronary Artery Lesion: A Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-Designed, Single Blind Test.

Authors:  Chang-Hwan Yoon; Jihong Jang; Seung Ho Hur; Jun-Hee Lee; Seung Hwan Han; Soon-Jun Hong; Kiyuk Chang; In-Ho Chae
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.101

5.  Learning from the Cardiologists and Developing Eluting Stents Targeting the Mtor Pathway for Pulmonary Application; A Future Concept for Tracheal Stenosis.

Authors:  Paul Zarogoulidis; Kaid Darwiche; Kosmas Tsakiridis; Helmut Teschler; Lonny Yarmus; Konstantinos Zarogoulidis; Lutz Freitag
Journal:  J Mol Genet Med       Date:  2013-08-26

6.  Clinical performance of biodegradable versus permanent polymer drug-eluting stents: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials at long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Q I Wang; Y U Zhou; Tong Qiao; Min Zhou
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  Drug diffusion and biological responses of arteries using a drug-eluting stent with nonuniform coating.

Authors:  Noboru Saito; Yuhei Mori; Sayaka Uchiyama
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2016-03-17

Review 8.  Drug Eluting Stents for Malignant Airway Obstruction: A Critical Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Wolfgang Hohenforst-Schmidt; Paul Zarogoulidis; Georgia Pitsiou; Bernd Linsmeier; Drosos Tsavlis; Ioannis Kioumis; Eleni Papadaki; Lutz Freitag; Theodora Tsiouda; J Francis Turner; Robert Browning; Michael Simoff; Nikolaos Sachpekidis; Kosmas Tsakiridis; Bojan Zaric; Lonny Yarmus; Sofia Baka; Grigoris Stratakos; Harald Rittger
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 9.  Vascular restoration therapy and bioresorbable vascular scaffold.

Authors:  Yunbing Wang; Xingdong Zhang
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2014-10-20

10.  Optimizing the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug-eluting coronary stents.

Authors:  Ying Shen; Wei-Feng Shen
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 2.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.