Literature DB >> 23685172

Accurate measurement of Atomic Force Microscope cantilever deflection excluding tip-surface contact with application to force calibration.

Ashley D Slattery1, Adam J Blanch, Jamie S Quinton, Christopher T Gibson.   

Abstract

Considerable attention has been given to the calibration of AFM cantilever spring constants in the last 20 years. Techniques that do not require tip-sample contact are considered advantageous since the imaging tip is not at risk of being damaged. Far less attention has been directed toward measuring the cantilever deflection or sensitivity, despite the fact that the primary means of determining this factor relies on the AFM tip being pressed against a hard surface, such as silicon or sapphire; which has the potential to significantly damage the tip. A recent method developed by Tourek et al. in 2010 involves deflecting the AFM cantilever a known distance from the imaging tip by pressing the cantilever against a sharpened tungsten wire. In this work a similar yet more precise method is described, whereby the deflection of the cantilever is achieved using an AFM probe with a spring constant much larger than the test cantilever, essentially a rigid cantilever. The exact position of loading on the test cantilever was determined by reverse AFM imaging small spatial markers that are milled into the test cantilever using a focussed ion beam. For V shaped cantilevers it is possible to reverse image the arm intersection in order to determine the exact loading point without necessarily requiring FIB milled spatial markers, albeit at the potential cost of additional uncertainty. The technique is applied to tip-less, beam shaped and V shaped cantilevers and compared to the hard surface contact technique with very good agreement (on average less than 5% difference). While the agreement with the hard surface contact technique was very good the error on the technique is dependent upon the assumptions inherent in the method, such as cantilever shape, loading point distance and ratio of test to rigid cantilever spring constants. The average error ranged between 2 to 5% for the majority of test cantilevers studied. The sensitivity derived with this technique can then be used to calibrate the cantilever spring constant using the thermal noise method, allowing complete force calibration to be accurately performed without tip-sample contact.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AFM; Calibration; Cantilever; Focused ion beam; Sensitivity; Thermal Noise

Year:  2013        PMID: 23685172     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultramicroscopy        ISSN: 0304-3991            Impact factor:   2.689


  9 in total

1.  Mechanical control of mitotic progression in single animal cells.

Authors:  Cedric J Cattin; Marcel Düggelin; David Martinez-Martin; Christoph Gerber; Daniel J Müller; Martin P Stewart
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The N Terminus of Adhesion G Protein-Coupled Receptor GPR126/ADGRG6 as Allosteric Force Integrator.

Authors:  Jakob Mitgau; Julius Franke; Camilla Schinner; Gabriele Stephan; Sandra Berndt; Dimitris G Placantonakis; Hermann Kalwa; Volker Spindler; Caroline Wilde; Ines Liebscher
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-06-23

Review 3.  Biomechanical properties of retina and choroid: a comprehensive review of techniques and translational relevance.

Authors:  Mariantonia Ferrara; Gaia Lugano; Maria Teresa Sandinha; Victoria R Kearns; Brendan Geraghty; David H W Steel
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Simplified Aeroelastic Model for Fluid Structure Interaction between Microcantilever Sensors and Fluid Surroundings.

Authors:  Fei Wang; Liang Zhao; Yanling Zhang; Zhi Qiao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Different signaling patterns contribute to loss of keratinocyte cohesion dependent on autoantibody profile in pemphigus.

Authors:  Elias Walter; Franziska Vielmuth; Lukas Rotkopf; Miklós Sárdy; Orsolya N Horváth; Matthias Goebeler; Enno Schmidt; Rüdiger Eming; Michael Hertl; Volker Spindler; Jens Waschke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Water-content related alterations in macro and micro scale tendon biomechanics.

Authors:  Pamela F Lozano; Mario Scholze; Carsten Babian; Holger Scheidt; Franziska Vielmuth; Jens Waschke; Benjamin Ondruschka; Niels Hammer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Investigation on blind tip reconstruction errors caused by sample features.

Authors:  Jiahuan Wan; Linyan Xu; Sen Wu; Xiaodong Hu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Contact-free experimental determination of the static flexural spring constant of cantilever sensors using a microfluidic force tool.

Authors:  John D Parkin; Georg Hähner
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.649

9.  Improved Application of Carbon Nanotube Atomic Force Microscopy Probes Using PeakForce Tapping Mode.

Authors:  Ashley D Slattery; Cameron J Shearer; Joseph G Shapter; Adam J Blanch; Jamie S Quinton; Christopher T Gibson
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 5.076

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.