Literature DB >> 23685107

Non-contrast 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography for visualization of intracranial aneurysms in patients with absolute contraindications to CT or MRI contrast.

Vijay Yanamadala1, Sameer A Sheth, Brian P Walcott, Bradley R Buchbinder, Deidre Buckley, Christopher S Ogilvy.   

Abstract

The preoperative evaluation of patients with intracranial aneurysms typically includes a contrast-enhanced vascular study, such as computed tomography angiography (CTA), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), or digital subtraction angiography. However, there are numerous absolute and relative contraindications to the administration of imaging contrast agents, including pregnancy, severe contrast allergy, and renal insufficiency. Evaluation of patients with contrast contraindications thus presents a unique challenge. We identified three patients with absolute contrast contraindications who presented with intracranial aneurysms. One patient was pregnant, while the other two had previous severe anaphylactic reactions to iodinated contrast. Because of these contraindications to intravenous contrast, we performed non-contrast time-of-flight MRA with 3D reconstruction (TOF MRA with 3DR) with maximum intensity projections and volume renderings as part of the preoperative evaluation prior to successful open surgical clipping of the aneurysms. In the case of one paraclinoid aneurysm, a high-resolution non-contrast CT scan was also performed to assess the relationship of the aneurysm to the anterior clinoid process. TOF MRA with 3DR successfully identified the intracranial aneurysms and adequately depicted the surrounding microanatomy. Intraoperative findings were as predicted by the preoperative imaging studies. The aneurysms were successfully clip-obliterated, and the patients had uneventful post-operative courses. These cases demonstrate that non-contrast imaging is a viable modality to assess intracranial aneurysms as part of the surgical planning process in patients with contrast contraindications. TOF MRA with 3DR, in conjunction with high-resolution non-contrast CT when indicated, provides adequate visualization of the microanatomy of the aneurysm and surrounding structures.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aneurysm; Contrast; Intracranial; MRI; Pregnancy; Time of flight

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23685107      PMCID: PMC3707952          DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  26 in total

Review 1.  Anaphylactoid reactions to radiocontrast media.

Authors:  Lauren M Canter
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Proc       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.587

Review 2.  Ionizing radiations in pregnancy and teratogenesis: a review of literature.

Authors:  M De Santis; E Di Gianantonio; G Straface; A F Cavaliere; A Caruso; F Schiavon; R Berletti; M Clementi
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.143

Review 3.  Modern cross-sectional imaging in the diagnosis and follow-up of intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Karsten Papke; Friedhelm Brassel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-14       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Volume rendering versus maximum intensity projection in CT angiography: what works best, when, and why.

Authors:  Elliot K Fishman; Derek R Ney; David G Heath; Frank M Corl; Karen M Horton; Pamela T Johnson
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  ACR guidance document for safe MR practices: 2007.

Authors:  Emanuel Kanal; A James Barkovich; Charlotte Bell; James P Borgstede; William G Bradley; Jerry W Froelich; Tobias Gilk; J Rod Gimbel; John Gosbee; Ellisa Kuhni-Kaminski; James W Lester; John Nyenhuis; Yoav Parag; Daniel J Schaefer; Elizabeth A Sebek-Scoumis; Jeffrey Weinreb; Loren A Zaremba; Pamela Wilcox; Leonard Lucey; Nancy Sass
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  MR angiography fusion technique for treatment planning of intracranial arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Kiaran P McGee; Vladimir Ivanovic; Joel P Felmlee; Fredrick B Meyer; Bruce E Pollock; John Huston
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 7.  Review article: Acute serious and fatal reactions to contrast media: our current understanding.

Authors:  S K Morcos
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  Prophylaxis strategies for contrast-induced nephropathy.

Authors:  Neesh Pannu; Natasha Wiebe; Marcello Tonelli
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Intracranial aneurysm detection with 3T magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  Phua-Hwee Tang; Francis Hui; Yih-Yian Sitoh
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.473

Review 10.  The implications of ISAT and ISUIA for the management of cerebral aneurysms during pregnancy.

Authors:  Laurence A G Marshman; A Robert Aspoas; Manjit S Rai; Sanjiv J Chawda
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 2.800

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Imaging Modalities for Intracranial Aneurysm: More Than Meets the Eye.

Authors:  Clémence Maupu; Héloïse Lebas; Yacine Boulaftali
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-02-15

2.  Can we evaluate cranial aneurysms on conventional brain magnetic resonance imaging?

Authors:  Emine Caliskan; Yeliz Pekcevik; Adnan Kaya
Journal:  J Neurosci Rural Pract       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.