Literature DB >> 23684957

Editorial rejects? Novelty, schnovelty!

Göran Arnqvist1.   

Abstract

Because many journals are currently increasing the rate of pre-peer-review editorial rejects, the editorial criteria upon which such decisions are based are very important. Here, I spotlight 'novelty' as a criterion and argue that it is a very problematic decisive factor at this stage of the editorial process.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23684957     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  2 in total

1.  With great power comes great responsibility: the importance of rejection, power, and editors in the practice of scientific publishing.

Authors:  Christopher J Lortie; Stefano Allesina; Lonnie Aarssen; Olyana Grod; Amber E Budden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  A new era for Journal of Biological Research-Thessaloniki.

Authors:  Theodore J Abatzopoulos
Journal:  J Biol Res (Thessalon)       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 1.889

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.