Literature DB >> 23684578

DXA predictions of human femoral mechanical properties depend on the load configuration.

E Dall'Ara1, B Luisier, R Schmidt, M Pretterklieber, F Kainberger, P Zysset, D Pahr.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of dual energy X-rays absorptiometry (DXA) areal bone mineral density (aBMD) measured in different regions of the proximal part of the human femur for predicting the mechanical properties of matched proximal femora tested in two different loading configurations. 36 pairs of fresh frozen femora were DXA scanned and tested until failure in two loading configurations: a fall on the side or a one-legged standing. The ability of the DXA output from four different regions of the proximal femur in predicting the femoral mechanical properties was measured and compared for the two loading scenarios. The femoral neck DXA BMD was best correlated to the femoral ultimate force for both configurations and predicted significantly better femoral failure load (R(2)=0.80 vs. R(2)=0.66, P<0.05) when simulating a side than when simulating a standing configuration. Conversely, the work to failure was predicted similarly for both loading configurations (R(2)=0.54 vs. R(2)=0.53, P>0.05). Therefore, neck BMD should be considered as one of the key factors for discriminating femoral fracture risk in vivo. Moreover, the better predictive ability of neck BMD for femoral strength if tested in a fall compared to a one-legged stance configuration suggests that DXA's clinical relevance may not be as high for spontaneous femoral fractures than for fractures associated to a fall.
Copyright © 2013 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMD; Biomechanics; Bone strength; Femur; Mechanical testing; Osteoporosis

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23684578     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2013.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  6 in total

1.  Where does hip fracture initiate?

Authors:  Philippe K Zysset
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2014-12-03

2.  Factors associated with proximal femur fracture determined in a large cadaveric cohort.

Authors:  Dan Dragomir-Daescu; Timothy L Rossman; Asghar Rezaei; Kent D Carlson; David F Kallmes; John A Skinner; Sundeep Khosla; Shreyasee Amin
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Finite element analysis for prediction of bone strength.

Authors:  Philippe K Zysset; Enrico Dall'ara; Peter Varga; Dieter H Pahr
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2013-08-07

4.  Perspectives on the non-invasive evaluation of femoral strength in the assessment of hip fracture risk.

Authors:  M L Bouxsein; P Zysset; C C Glüer; M McClung; E Biver; D D Pierroz; S L Ferrari
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Conventional finite element models estimate the strength of metastatic human vertebrae despite alterations of the bone's tissue and structure.

Authors:  Marc A Stadelmann; Denis E Schenk; Ghislain Maquer; Christopher Lenherr; Florian M Buck; Dieter D Bosshardt; Sven Hoppe; Nicolas Theumann; Ron N Alkalay; Philippe K Zysset
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 4.626

6.  Application of ultrasound on monitoring the evolution of the collagen fiber reinforced nHAC/CS composites in vivo.

Authors:  Yan Chen; Yuting Yan; Xiaoming Li; He Li; Huiting Tan; Huajun Li; Yanwen Zhu; Philipp Niemeyer; Matin Yaega; Bo Yu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.