Literature DB >> 23684373

Metabolic complications with the use of mTOR inhibitors for cancer therapy.

Shanthi Sivendran1, Neeraj Agarwal, Benjamin Gartrell, Jian Ying, Kenneth M Boucher, Toni K Choueiri, Guru Sonpavde, William K Oh, Matthew D Galsky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: mTOR inhibitors are now approved by regulatory agencies for the treatment of a variety of malignancies. The risk of metabolic complications with these agents is not well characterized.
METHODS: PubMed was searched for articles published from 2001 until 2011. Eligible studies included prospective randomized trials evaluating temsirolimus, everolimus, and ridaforolimus in patients with all solid tumor malignancies. Sixteen eligible phase II clinical trials and 8 randomized controlled clinical trials were included in a systematic review and meta-analysis and the number of metabolic related AEs (hyperglycemia, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertriglyceridemia) was extracted. Incidence rates and incident rate ratios were calculated.
FINDINGS: Twenty-four trials, including 4261 patients, were included in the calculation of the incidence rate. The average incidence rate of all grade metabolic related events was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.47, 0.93). The average incidence rate of serious (grade 3 and 4) metabolic related adverse events was 0.11 (95% CI, 0.08, 0.15). The incidence rate ratio (IRR) of a metabolic adverse event with mTOR inhibitor therapy compared with control was 2.93 (95% CI, 2.33, 3.70) and of serious grade 3 and 4 metabolic adverse events was 4.58 (95% CI, 2.86, 7.34). The IRR of all grade hyperglycemia was 2.95 (95% CI, 2.14, 4.05) and of grade 3-4 hyperglycemia was 5.25 (95% CI, 3.07, 9.00). The IRR of all grade hypertriglyceridemia was 2.49 (95% CI, 1.76, 3.52) and of grade 3-4 hypertriglyceridemia was 2.01 (95% CI, 0.65, 6.27). The IRR of all grade hypercholesterolemia was 3.35 (95% CI, 2.17, 5.18) and of grade 3-4 hypercholesterolemia was 6.51 (95% CI, 1.48, 28.59). These findings suggest a statistically significant increase in the risk of hyperglycemia, hypercholesterolemia (all grades and grade 3 and 4), and all grade hypertriglyceridemia associated with mTOR therapy when compared with control.
INTERPRETATION: The risk of all grade and grade 3-4, hyperglycemia, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertriglyceridemia, are increase in patients treated with mTOR inhibitors compared with control.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse events; Cancer; Everolimus; Metabolic; Ridaforolimus; Temsirolimus; mTOR inhibitor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23684373      PMCID: PMC4744486          DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2013.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev        ISSN: 0305-7372            Impact factor:   12.111


  29 in total

1.  Phase II study of everolimus (RAD001) in previously treated small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Ahmad Tarhini; Athanasios Kotsakis; William Gooding; Yongli Shuai; Daniel Petro; David Friedland; Chandra P Belani; Sanja Dacic; Athanassios Argiris
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  ACP Journal Club. The devil is in the details...or not? A primer on individual patient data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sachin Sud; James Douketis
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  A phase 2 study of the oral mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, everolimus, in patients with recurrent endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Brian M Slomovitz; Karen H Lu; Taren Johnston; Robert L Coleman; Mark Munsell; Russell R Broaddus; Cheryl Walker; Lois M Ramondetta; Thomas W Burke; David M Gershenson; Judith Wolf
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Multicenter phase II study of everolimus in patients with previously treated metastatic gastric cancer.

Authors:  Toshihiko Doi; Kei Muro; Narikazu Boku; Yasuhide Yamada; Tomohiro Nishina; Hiroya Takiuchi; Yoshito Komatsu; Yasuo Hamamoto; Nobutsugu Ohno; Yoshie Fujita; Matthew Robson; Atsushi Ohtsu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Daily oral everolimus activity in patients with metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors after failure of cytotoxic chemotherapy: a phase II trial.

Authors:  James C Yao; Catherine Lombard-Bohas; Eric Baudin; Larry K Kvols; Philippe Rougier; Philippe Ruszniewski; Sakina Hoosen; Jessica St Peter; Tomas Haas; David Lebwohl; Eric Van Cutsem; Matthew H Kulke; Timothy J Hobday; Thomas M O'Dorisio; Manisha H Shah; Guillaume Cadiot; Gabriele Luppi; James A Posey; Bertram Wiedenmann
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Phase II randomized study of neoadjuvant everolimus plus letrozole compared with placebo plus letrozole in patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  José Baselga; Vladimir Semiglazov; Peter van Dam; Alexey Manikhas; Meritxell Bellet; José Mayordomo; Mario Campone; Ernst Kubista; Richard Greil; Giulia Bianchi; Jutta Steinseifer; Betty Molloy; Erika Tokaji; Humphrey Gardner; Penny Phillips; Michael Stumm; Heidi A Lane; J Michael Dixon; Walter Jonat; Hope S Rugo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Randomized phase II study comparing two schedules of everolimus in patients with recurrent/metastatic breast cancer: NCIC Clinical Trials Group IND.163.

Authors:  Susan L Ellard; Mark Clemons; Karen A Gelmon; Brian Norris; Hagen Kennecke; Stephen Chia; Kathleen Pritchard; Andrea Eisen; Ted Vandenberg; Marianne Taylor; Eric Sauerbrei; Moshe Mishaeli; David Huntsman; Wendy Walsh; Martin Olivo; Lynn McIntosh; Lesley Seymour
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-17       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  A phase 2 study with a daily regimen of the oral mTOR inhibitor RAD001 (everolimus) in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell cancer.

Authors:  Robert J Amato; Jaroslaw Jac; Sarah Giessinger; Somyata Saxena; James P Willis
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-21

10.  Inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) in advanced pancreatic cancer: results of two phase II studies.

Authors:  Milind M Javle; Rachna T Shroff; Henry Xiong; Gauri A Varadhachary; David Fogelman; Shrikanth A Reddy; Darren Davis; Yujian Zhang; Robert A Wolff; James L Abbruzzese
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  23 in total

1.  Glucose-dependent acetylation of Rictor promotes targeted cancer therapy resistance.

Authors:  Kenta Masui; Kazuhiro Tanaka; Shiro Ikegami; Genaro R Villa; Huijun Yang; William H Yong; Timothy F Cloughesy; Kanato Yamagata; Nobutaka Arai; Webster K Cavenee; Paul S Mischel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Paediatric cardio-oncology: epidemiology, screening, prevention, and treatment.

Authors:  Eric J Chow; Kasey J Leger; Neel S Bhatt; Daniel A Mulrooney; Colin J Ross; Sanjeev Aggarwal; Neha Bansal; Matthew J Ehrhardt; Saro H Armenian; Jessica M Scott; Borah Hong
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 10.787

Review 3.  Adrenocortical carcinoma: the management of metastatic disease.

Authors:  André P Fay; Aymen Elfiky; Gabriela H Teló; Rana R McKay; Marina Kaymakcalan; Paul L Nguyen; Anand Vaidya; Daniel T Ruan; Joaquim Bellmunt; Toni K Choueiri
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 4.  Hyperglycaemia Induced by Novel Anticancer Agents: An Undesirable Complication or a Potential Therapeutic Opportunity?

Authors:  Rashmi R Shah
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  New Agents, Emerging Late Effects, and the Development of Precision Survivorship.

Authors:  Eric J Chow; Zoltan Antal; Louis S Constine; Rebecca Gardner; W Hamish Wallace; Brent R Weil; Jennifer M Yeh; Elizabeth Fox
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Obesity and Breast Cancer: Molecular Interconnections and Potential Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Valeria Simone; Morena D'Avenia; Antonella Argentiero; Claudia Felici; Francesca Maria Rizzo; Giovanni De Pergola; Franco Silvestris
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-02-10

7.  Epstein-Barr virus-encoded latent membrane protein 2A promotes the epithelial-mesenchymal transition in nasopharyngeal carcinoma via metastatic tumor antigen 1 and mechanistic target of rapamycin signaling induction.

Authors:  Zhe Lin; Xin Wan; Runqiu Jiang; Lei Deng; Yun Gao; Junwei Tang; Yu Yang; Wei Zhao; Xin Yan; Kun Yao; Beicheng Sun; Yun Chen
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 8.  Insulin and cancer: a tangled web.

Authors:  Brooks P Leitner; Stephan Siebel; Ngozi D Akingbesote; Xinyi Zhang; Rachel J Perry
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.766

9.  Ampelopsin-induced autophagy protects breast cancer cells from apoptosis through Akt-mTOR pathway via endoplasmic reticulum stress.

Authors:  Yong Zhou; Xinyu Liang; Hui Chang; Furong Shu; Ying Wu; Ting Zhang; Yujie Fu; Qianyong Zhang; Jun-Dong Zhu; Mantian Mi
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 6.716

10.  mTOR drives cerebral blood flow and memory deficits in LDLR-/- mice modeling atherosclerosis and vascular cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Jordan B Jahrling; Ai-Ling Lin; Nicholas DeRosa; Stacy A Hussong; Candice E Van Skike; Milena Girotti; Martin Javors; Qingwei Zhao; Leigh Ann Maslin; Reto Asmis; Veronica Galvan
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 6.200

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.