Literature DB >> 23684138

Are prophylactic antibiotics necessary for urodynamic study?

Cenk Gürbüz1, Bayram Güner, Gökhan Atış, Lütfi Canat, Turhan Caşkurlu.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of prophylactic fosfomycin tromethamine (FT) and ciprofloxacin in preventing bacteriuria caused by urodynamic studies (UDS). A total of 426 adult patients presenting for UDS were enrolled the study. A midstream urine sample was taken 72 hours before and 5 days after the procedure. All patients underwent a standard UDS. The 411 patients who had sterile urine before intervention were included in the study. Patients were randomized into three groups. Group1 received no prophylaxis (n = 133), Group 2 (n = 141) received oral ciprofloxacin (500 mg) 1 hour before the procedure, and Group 3 (n = 137) received a single dose of FT approximately 12 hours before the procedure. Bacteriuria was evaluated for each group. Bacteriuria was detected in 3 (2.3%), 6 (4.3%) and 3 patients (1.6%) in Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3, respectively. The most common identified microorganism was Escherichia coli (E coli) in 6 patients (50%). Among the E coli group, extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing E coli was seen in 2 patients (33.3%). Univariate analysis demonstrated that a history of urogenital operation (p < 0.01) and female gender (p < 0.01) were significant risk factors for bacteriuria. On multiple logistic regression analysis, the past urogenital operation history was the only significant independent risk factor for significant bacteriuria after UDS (OR = 14, 95% CI = 1.82-23.8, p = 0.01). The prevalence of bacteriuria after UDS was relatively low in the current study population. Therefore, for most patients, it may be unnecessary to use preventive prophylactic antibiotics. However, our results suggest that in patients with a previous history of urologic surgery, the risk for significant bacteriuria is increased and the use of prophylaxis should be considered.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23684138     DOI: 10.1016/j.kjms.2012.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kaohsiung J Med Sci        ISSN: 1607-551X            Impact factor:   2.744


  5 in total

Review 1.  Where can urodynamic testing help assess male lower urinary tract symptoms?

Authors:  Cenk Gürbüz; Marcus J Drake
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-02-05

2.  Prophylactic Antibiotics for Urinary Tract Infections after Urodynamic Studies: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Yu Wu; Yu Cheng; Sheng-Fei Xu; Qing Ling; Xiao-Yi Yuan; Guang-Hui Du
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-02-28       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Should We Always Use Antibiotics after Urodynamic Studies in High-Risk Patients?

Authors:  Pawel Miotla; Sara Wawrysiuk; Kurt Naber; Ewa Markut-Miotla; Pawel Skorupski; Katarzyna Skorupska; Tomasz Rechberger
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Urinary tract infection in patients with spinal cord injury after urodynamics under fosfomycin prophylaxis: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Daniela M Amaral; Ana Margarida V C Pereira; Margarida R Rodrigues; Maria de Fátima L Gandarez; Maria R Cunha; Marta S R Torres
Journal:  Porto Biomed J       Date:  2019-11-26

5.  Rate of urinary tract infection after urodynamic study in pelvic floor clinic.

Authors:  Zinat Ghanbari; Fedyeh Haghollahi; Tahere Eftekhr; Tahere Froghifar; Mamak Shariat; Maryam Hajihashemy; Mohsen Ayati
Journal:  Caspian J Intern Med       Date:  2020
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.