OBJECTIVES: to explore women's perceptions and experiences of pregnancy and childbirth in a rural community in PNG. DESIGN: a qualitative, descriptive study comprising focus group discussions (FGDs) and in depth interviews. SETTING: this study took place in a rural community in Eastern Highlands Province, PNG. PARTICIPANTS: 51 women participated in seven focus group discussions. In depth interviews were undertaken with 21 women, including women recruited at the antenatal clinic, women purposively selected in the community and three key informants in the community. FINDINGS: the majority of women mentioned the benefits of receiving antenatal care at the health facility and the importance of a supervised, facility birth. Women faced numerous challenges with regards to accessing these services, including geographical, financial and language barriers. Cultural and customary beliefs surrounding childbirth and lack of decision making powers also impacted on whether women had a supervised birth. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: distance, terrain and transport as well as decision making processes and customary beliefs influenced whether a woman did or did not reach a health facility to give birth. While the wider issue of availability and location of health services and health system strengthening is addressed shorter term, community based interventions could be of benefit. These interventions should include safe motherhood and birth preparedness messages disseminated to women, men and key family and community members.
OBJECTIVES: to explore women's perceptions and experiences of pregnancy and childbirth in a rural community in PNG. DESIGN: a qualitative, descriptive study comprising focus group discussions (FGDs) and in depth interviews. SETTING: this study took place in a rural community in Eastern Highlands Province, PNG. PARTICIPANTS: 51 women participated in seven focus group discussions. In depth interviews were undertaken with 21 women, including women recruited at the antenatal clinic, women purposively selected in the community and three key informants in the community. FINDINGS: the majority of women mentioned the benefits of receiving antenatal care at the health facility and the importance of a supervised, facility birth. Women faced numerous challenges with regards to accessing these services, including geographical, financial and language barriers. Cultural and customary beliefs surrounding childbirth and lack of decision making powers also impacted on whether women had a supervised birth. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: distance, terrain and transport as well as decision making processes and customary beliefs influenced whether a woman did or did not reach a health facility to give birth. While the wider issue of availability and location of health services and health system strengthening is addressed shorter term, community based interventions could be of benefit. These interventions should include safe motherhood and birth preparedness messages disseminated to women, men and key family and community members.
Authors: Holger W Unger; Stephan Karl; Regina A Wangnapi; Peter Siba; Glen Mola; Jane Walker; Ivo Mueller; Maria Ome; Stephen J Rogerson Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2014-11-10 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Holger W Unger; Maria Ome-Kaius; Regina A Wangnapi; Alexandra J Umbers; Sarah Hanieh; Connie S N Li Wai Suen; Leanne J Robinson; Anna Rosanas-Urgell; Johanna Wapling; Elvin Lufele; Charles Kongs; Paula Samol; Desmond Sui; Dupain Singirok; Azucena Bardaji; Louis Schofield; Clara Menendez; Inoni Betuela; Peter Siba; Ivo Mueller; Stephen J Rogerson Journal: BMC Med Date: 2015-01-16 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Stephan Karl; Connie S N Li Wai Suen; Holger W Unger; Maria Ome-Kaius; Glen Mola; Lisa White; Regina A Wangnapi; Stephen J Rogerson; Ivo Mueller Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-05-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Michelle Redman-MacLaren; Jane Mills; Rachael Tommbe; David MacLaren; Rick Speare; William J H McBride Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 2.809
Authors: Elizabeth Peach; Christopher Morgan; Michelle J L Scoullar; Freya J I Fowkes; Elissa Kennedy; Pele Melepia; Primrose Homiehombo; Lucy Au; Stanley Luchters; Alexandra J Umbers; Andrew Vallely; Lisa M Vallely; Angela Kelly-Hanku; Leanne J Robinson; Brendan S Crabb; Arthur Elijah; Peter M Siba; William Pomat; James G Beeson Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-01-13 Impact factor: 4.379