BACKGROUND: Youth problem behaviors remain a public health issue. Youth in low-income, urban areas are particularly at risk for engaging in aggressive, violent, and disruptive behaviors. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of a school-based social-emotional learning and health promotion program on problem behaviors and related attitudes among low-income, urban youth. DESIGN: A matched-pair, cluster RCT. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Participants were drawn from 14 Chicago Public Schools over a 6-year period of program delivery with outcomes assessed for a cohort of youth followed from Grades 3 to 8. Data were collected from Fall 2004 to Spring 2010, and analyzed in Spring 2012. INTERVENTION: The Positive Action program includes a scoped and sequenced K-12 classroom curriculum with six components: self-concept, social and emotional positive actions for managing oneself responsibly, and positive actions directed toward physical and mental health, honesty, getting along with others, and continually improving oneself. The program also includes teacher, counselor, family, and community training as well as activities directed toward schoolwide climate development. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Youth reported on their normative beliefs in support of aggression and on their bullying, disruptive, and violent behaviors; parents rated youths' bullying behaviors and conduct problems; schoolwide data on disciplinary referrals and suspensions were obtained from school records. RESULTS: Multilevel growth-curve modeling analyses conducted on completion of the trial indicated that Positive Action mitigated increases over time in (1) youth reports of normative beliefs supporting aggressive behaviors and of engaging in disruptive behavior and bullying (girls only) and (2) parent reports of youth bullying behaviors (boys only). At study end-point, students in Positive Action schools also reported a lower rate of violence-related behavior than students in control schools. Schoolwide findings indicated positive program effects on both disciplinary referrals and suspensions. Program effect sizes ranged from -0.26 to -0.68. CONCLUSIONS: These results extend evidence of the effectiveness of the Positive Action program to low-income, minority, urban school settings, and to middle school-aged youth.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Youth problem behaviors remain a public health issue. Youth in low-income, urban areas are particularly at risk for engaging in aggressive, violent, and disruptive behaviors. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of a school-based social-emotional learning and health promotion program on problem behaviors and related attitudes among low-income, urban youth. DESIGN: A matched-pair, cluster RCT. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Participants were drawn from 14 Chicago Public Schools over a 6-year period of program delivery with outcomes assessed for a cohort of youth followed from Grades 3 to 8. Data were collected from Fall 2004 to Spring 2010, and analyzed in Spring 2012. INTERVENTION: The Positive Action program includes a scoped and sequenced K-12 classroom curriculum with six components: self-concept, social and emotional positive actions for managing oneself responsibly, and positive actions directed toward physical and mental health, honesty, getting along with others, and continually improving oneself. The program also includes teacher, counselor, family, and community training as well as activities directed toward schoolwide climate development. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Youth reported on their normative beliefs in support of aggression and on their bullying, disruptive, and violent behaviors; parents rated youths' bullying behaviors and conduct problems; schoolwide data on disciplinary referrals and suspensions were obtained from school records. RESULTS: Multilevel growth-curve modeling analyses conducted on completion of the trial indicated that Positive Action mitigated increases over time in (1) youth reports of normative beliefs supporting aggressive behaviors and of engaging in disruptive behavior and bullying (girls only) and (2) parent reports of youth bullying behaviors (boys only). At study end-point, students in Positive Action schools also reported a lower rate of violence-related behavior than students in control schools. Schoolwide findings indicated positive program effects on both disciplinary referrals and suspensions. Program effect sizes ranged from -0.26 to -0.68. CONCLUSIONS: These results extend evidence of the effectiveness of the Positive Action program to low-income, minority, urban school settings, and to middle school-aged youth.
Authors: Danice K Eaton; Laura Kann; Steve Kinchen; James Ross; Joseph Hawkins; William A Harris; Richard Lowry; Tim McManus; David Chyen; Shari Shanklin; Connie Lim; Jo Anne Grunbaum; Howell Wechsler Journal: J Sch Health Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 2.118
Authors: Christina Gustavson; Ola Ståhlberg; Anna-Kari Sjödin; Anders Forsman; Thomas Nilsson; Henrik Anckarsäter Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2007-07-19 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Niloofar Bavarian; Kendra M Lewis; Alan Acock; David L DuBois; Zi Yan; Samuel Vuchinich; Naida Silverthorn; Joseph Day; Brian R Flay Journal: J Prim Prev Date: 2016-02
Authors: Kendra M Lewis; Samuel Vuchinich; Peter Ji; David L DuBois; Alan Acock; Niloofar Bavarian; Joseph Day; Naida Silverthorn; Brian R Flay Journal: Appl Dev Sci Date: 2015-05-29
Authors: Anthony Biglan; Karen Elfner; S Andrew Garbacz; Kelli Komro; Ronald J Prinz; Mark D Weist; Dawn K Wilson; Amie Zarling Journal: Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev Date: 2020-06
Authors: G J Melendez-Torres; Tara Tancred; Adam Fletcher; Rona Campbell; James Thomas; Christopher Bonell Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-09-21 Impact factor: 2.692