Literature DB >> 23683949

Predictors of left ventricular remodeling after surgical repair or replacement for pure severe mitral regurgitation caused by leaflet prolapse.

Mario Sénéchal1, Jimmy MacHaalany, Olivier F Bertrand, Kim O'Connor, Julie Parenteau, Isaïe-Nicolas Dubois-Sénéchal, Olivier Costerousse, Michelle Dubois, Pierre Voisine.   

Abstract

We sought to determine whether preoperative baseline echocardiographic analysis and the type of surgical procedure are predictive of the magnitude and timing of postoperative left ventricular (LV) remodeling in patients undergoing valve surgery for pure severe mitral regurgitation (MR) secondary to leaflet prolapse. Seventy-two consecutive patients without coronary artery disease undergoing valve repair (MVr; n = 42) or replacement (MVR; n = 30) underwent preoperative, early (1 to 2 days) and late postoperative (4.5 ± 2.5 and 18 ± 8.0 months) echocardiography. Patients were categorized according to their baseline LV ejection fraction (EF) (Group 1: EF ≥60%, Group 2: EF = 50% to 59%, Group 3: EF <50%). Preservation of the subvalvular apparatus was achieved in most patients undergoing MV replacement (87%). Over a median follow-up period of 450 days, LVEF changed as follows: Group 1: 63% ± 2% to 60% ± 3% (p <0.0001); Group 2: 55% ± 3% to 52% ± 6% (p <0.0001); Group 3: 43% ± 4% to 42% ± 5% (p <0.01). Two-thirds of the observed changes in LV diameters and volumes occurred in the first 6 months. Preoperative LVEF was the best predictor of postoperative LVEF ≥60% (odds ratio 1.50, 95% confidence interval, 1.25 to 1.97; p <0.0001). No significant difference was found in LV remodeling parameters between patients undergoing MVr and MVR. In conclusion, patients with pure severe MR due to valve prolapse LVEF remained normal after surgery only in patients with baseline LVEF ≥60%. MVR with subvalvular preservation was associated with similar postoperative remodeling as MVr.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23683949     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.04.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

Review 1.  Left Ventricular Remodeling in Non-syndromic Mitral Valve Prolapse: Volume Overload or Concomitant Cardiomyopathy?

Authors:  Lobke L Pype; Philippe B Bertrand; Bernard P Paelinck; Hein Heidbuchel; Emeline M Van Craenenbroeck; Caroline M Van De Heyning
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-12

2.  Indications for intervention in asymptomatic children with chronic mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  Joyce T Johnson; Aaron W Eckhauser; Nelangi M Pinto; Hsin-Yi Weng; L LuAnn Minich; Lloyd Y Tani
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and natriuretic peptide levels in patients with sinus rhythm and severe left atrial enlargement following mitral valve surgery: early and late changes.

Authors:  S Hyllén; S Nozohoor; C Meurling; P Wierup; J Sjögren
Journal:  Heart Lung Vessel       Date:  2015

4.  Stage-based approach to predict left ventricular reverse remodeling after mitral repair.

Authors:  Makoto Hibino; Nitish K Dhingra; Vincent Chan; C David Mazer; Hwee Teoh; Adrian Quan; Raj Verma; Howard Leong-Poi; Gianluigi Bisleri; Kim A Connelly; Subodh Verma
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.287

5.  Outcome of mitral valve repair or replacement for non-ischemic mitral regurgitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qianqian Fan; Xiaoguang Li; Guilan Cao; Puliang Yu; Fengxiao Zhang
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 1.637

6.  Comparison of Mitral Valve Repair versus Replacement for the Progression of Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation.

Authors:  Yang Gao; Shubin Li; Xijing Zhuang; Feng Gao; Lei Shi; Xu Meng
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 1.520

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.