Literature DB >> 23683662

Dissemination of metabolomics results: role of MetaboLights and COSMOS.

Reza M Salek1, Kenneth Haug, Christoph Steinbeck.   

Abstract

With ever-increasing amounts of metabolomics data produced each year, there is an even greater need to disseminate data and knowledge produced in a standard and reproducible way. To assist with this a general purpose, open source metabolomics repository, MetaboLights, was launched in 2012. To promote a community standard, initially culminated as metabolomics standards initiative (MSI), COordination of Standards in MetabOlomicS (COSMOS) was introduced. COSMOS aims to link life science e-infrastructures within the worldwide metabolomics community as well as develop and maintain open source exchange formats for raw and processed data, ensuring better flow of metabolomics information.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23683662      PMCID: PMC3658998          DOI: 10.1186/2047-217X-2-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gigascience        ISSN: 2047-217X            Impact factor:   6.524


Background

Metabolomics is a fast growing field, which conveys a snapshot of the metabolic dynamics or metabolic phenotype of the living organism whether healthy or in response to pathophysiological stimuli, environmental factors or disease. The number of metabolomics knowledge bases and peer-reviewed publications are rising steadily every year and there is a great need to share and disseminate metabolomics data, as the support and requirement grows from journal publishers, funding bodies and research community organisations. Within other related “-Omics” communities such as proteomics, transcriptomics and genomics it is a commonly accepted practice to share data by submitting their results to a public repository during or prior to submission of their manuscript, resulting in shared high-quality, structured data [1]. There are prerequisites within each discipline, prior to any such submission, to have agreed, community driven standards for reporting experimental data, commonly known as minimum information, using controlled vocabularies, terminologies and standard file formats to make exchangeable data more robust. It is evident that in order to have comprehensive, comparable and reproducible results you need to capture sufficient, i.e. minimal agreed, contextual ‘metadata’ information. Metadata itself could be quite broad; from provenance of a study material, biological and experimental metadata, to technology based information settings, protocols and parameters [1,2]. One major driving force behind such initiatives is community-sourced and agreed standards that are active, broad participation and dynamic aiming, achieving a comprehensive solution. Historically this work within the metabolomics community, after several parallel attempts, eventually lead to the formation of the Metabolomics Standards Initiative (MSI, [3,4]), culminating in several publications and recommendations after constant negotiation and coordination between stakeholders involved in development of standards within the metabolomics community. However, not many practical applications for such exercises were observed, with only few exceptions [5,6]. One major reason was due to lack of an open source, cross platform and cross species repository for capturing metabolomics experimental results while adhering to the MSI reporting requirement.

Metabolomics repositories

In 2012 EMBL-EBI announced a general-purpose open source metabolomics repository, known as MetaboLights [7,8] to satisfy this missing gap. MetaboLights was launched at the 8th International Conference of the Metabolomics Society in Washington DC, USA. One of the main challenges was to ensure accommodation of all contextual metadata within the repository that is of interest to the community and in a practical way for users to fulfil its requirement within an acceptable time frame and effort. MetaboLights draws on the ‘Investigation/Study/Assay’ (ISA) framework, taking advantage of the modular ISA Software Suite for capturing experimental metadata and to facilitate curation at source [2]. The ISAtools suite transforms all data in ISA-tab, a highly configurable format, making it easy to conform to MSI reporting requirements and to facilitate the correct use of specific metabolomics terminologies. The metabolomics study metadata, captured using ISAtools including experimental raw files, would automatically be packaged into a zip file and uploaded to MetaboLights by the user, from which a basic ISA framework validation step will be performed. Once this validation step has been successfully passed, a unique MetaboLights identifier/accession number will be assigned to the study. After this step, with the help of the submitter, the MetaboLights curation team works toward verifying whether correct information had been captured, while adhering to MSI requirements. The curation team additionally checks for correctly annotated metadata terms linked to the most appropriate ontologies, modifying these when required. This is a manual process that requires constant communication between the curator and submitter to reach a standard agreed completion stage for the metadata captured. Metabolomics is quite a diverse field and a number of ontologies describing the metadata for metabolomics are still missing. MetaboLights ideally requires the submitter to provide the raw experimental data using an open source format, including control samples, replicates, blank samples and any additional experiments or chemical standards used for metabolite identification. To date, within the metabolomics community there seems to be a great dependence on vendor proprietary file formats for data analysis and metabolite identification. The implementation and usage of open source files, among instrument manufacturers and the metabolomics community is not widespread. This is partially a result of the lack of a metabolomics specific exchange format and active participation of the community. While, for example there is a relatively large attendance at the annual meeting for Human Proteome Organisation’s Proteomics Standards Initiative (HUPO-PSI, [9]), until recently no such meeting has taken place for MSI, but this is about to change. The requirement for a metabolomics centric open source and standard file format resulted in the formation of COordination of Standards in MetabOlomicS – COSMOS, [8]. This consortium consists primarily of 14 European partners, but is open to the entire metabolomics community, with MetaboLights playing a central role for the coordination work. The main objective of COSMOS is to develop efficient policies ensuring metabolomics based experimental data are encoded in open standards, and tagged with a community-agreed metadata. In addition, COSMOS aims to deliver the exchange formats and terminological artifacts that are missing and are required to describe, exchange and query metabolomics experiments. Finally, COSMOS aims to develop and maintain the metabolomic based exchange formats for raw data and processed information (identification, quantification), based on the previous works of the Proteomics Standards Initiative (PSI, [9]) and to fulfil missing open standards, such as NMR Markup Language (nmrML) for capturing and disseminating Nuclear Magnetic Resonance spectroscopy data in metabolomics.

Road ahead

There has recently been various initiatives to take metabolomics to next step, for example, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Common Funds Metabolomics Initiatives awarded funding related to metabolomics research advancement, funding three Regional Comprehensive Metabolomics Research Cores (RCMRC) and a Data Repository and Coordination Centre (DRCC) to act as a North American hub for metabolomics related research [10]. A second round of proposals is currently under evaluation. Furthermore, the new state of the art the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) and the Medical Research Council (MRC) Phenome Centre hosted by Imperial College London, (http://www.imperial.ac.uk/phenomecentre/) aims to analyse thousands of biofluids using metabolomics based technologies in order to facilitate discovery about how our genes interact with the environment to cause and affect the course of disease. These new initiatives as well as others by the ever-growing international metabolomics community will bring new challenges for metabolomics data handling, data analysis, knowledge curation and dissemination. Publishers have for a long time tried to encourage making publicly available high quality metabolomics data within every published manuscript. While it is a very tedious task for publishers to judge if the data is deposited and backs up the conclusions published, this requirement is growing steadily for metabolomics studies. In contrast from a submitter point of view there is typically a concern regarding privacy of data prior to publication, so data is quite often stored behind password protected ftp sites, further complicating data exchange. With MetaboLights, other such repositories and COSMOS we are trying to address some of these issues, by providing a means for metabolomics results to be publically available to the community while considering the needs for an acceptable privacy period as requested by the submitter. We hope to further metabolomics standards via the COSMOS initiative and involvement of metabolomics stakeholders and wider community to provide open source standard file formats to capture metabolomics instrumental metadata, making the task of data submission easier, and to promote adherence and implementation of MSI recommendations for reporting metabolomics results.

Abbreviations

COSMOS: COordination of Standards in MetabOlomics; HUPO-PSI: Human Proteome Organisation’s Proteomics Standards Initiative; ISA: ‘Investigation/Study/Assay’; MSI: Metabolomics Standards Initiative

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

RMS wrote the first draft with input from KH and CS, based on their experience over the last decade. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
  8 in total

Review 1.  The work of the Human Proteome Organisation's Proteomics Standards Initiative (HUPO PSI).

Authors:  Chris F Taylor; Henning Hermjakob; Randall K Julian; John S Garavelli; Ruedi Aebersold; Rolf Apweiler
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2006

2.  So what have data standards ever done for us? The view from metabolomics.

Authors:  Julian L Griffin; Christoph Steinbeck
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 11.117

3.  The metabolomics standards initiative.

Authors:  Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Teresa Fan; Royston Goodacre; Julian L Griffin; Nigel W Hardy; Rima Kaddurah-Daouk; Bruce S Kristal; John Lindon; Pedro Mendes; Norman Morrison; Basil Nikolau; Don Robertson; Lloyd W Sumner; Chris Taylor; Mariët van der Werf; Ben van Ommen; Oliver Fiehn
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Toward interoperable bioscience data.

Authors:  Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Philippe Rocca-Serra; Dawn Field; Eamonn Maguire; Chris Taylor; Oliver Hofmann; Hong Fang; Steffen Neumann; Weida Tong; Linda Amaral-Zettler; Kimberly Begley; Tim Booth; Lydie Bougueleret; Gully Burns; Brad Chapman; Tim Clark; Lee-Ann Coleman; Jay Copeland; Sudeshna Das; Antoine de Daruvar; Paula de Matos; Ian Dix; Scott Edmunds; Chris T Evelo; Mark J Forster; Pascale Gaudet; Jack Gilbert; Carole Goble; Julian L Griffin; Daniel Jacob; Jos Kleinjans; Lee Harland; Kenneth Haug; Henning Hermjakob; Shannan J Ho Sui; Alain Laederach; Shaoguang Liang; Stephen Marshall; Annette McGrath; Emily Merrill; Dorothy Reilly; Magali Roux; Caroline E Shamu; Catherine A Shang; Christoph Steinbeck; Anne Trefethen; Bryn Williams-Jones; Katherine Wolstencroft; Ioannis Xenarios; Winston Hide
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  A Metadata description of the data in "A metabolomic comparison of urinary changes in type 2 diabetes in mouse, rat, and human.".

Authors:  Julian L Griffin; Helen J Atherton; Chris Steinbeck; Reza M Salek
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2011-07-29

6.  Megascience. 'Omics data sharing.

Authors:  Dawn Field; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Amanda Collis; Tim Booth; Peter Dukes; Susan K Gregurick; Karen Kennedy; Patrik Kolar; Eugene Kolker; Mary Maxon; Siân Millard; Alexis-Michel Mugabushaka; Nicola Perrin; Jacques E Remacle; Karin Remington; Philippe Rocca-Serra; Chris F Taylor; Mark Thorley; Bela Tiwari; John Wilbanks
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  MetaboLights--an open-access general-purpose repository for metabolomics studies and associated meta-data.

Authors:  Kenneth Haug; Reza M Salek; Pablo Conesa; Janna Hastings; Paula de Matos; Mark Rijnbeek; Tejasvi Mahendraker; Mark Williams; Steffen Neumann; Philippe Rocca-Serra; Eamonn Maguire; Alejandra González-Beltrán; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Julian L Griffin; Christoph Steinbeck
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  MetaboLights: towards a new COSMOS of metabolomics data management.

Authors:  Christoph Steinbeck; Pablo Conesa; Kenneth Haug; Tejasvi Mahendraker; Mark Williams; Eamonn Maguire; Philippe Rocca-Serra; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Reza M Salek; Julian L Griffin
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 4.290

  8 in total
  13 in total

Review 1.  Principles and practice of lipidomics.

Authors:  Frédéric M Vaz; Mia Pras-Raves; Albert H Bootsma; Antoine H C van Kampen
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 4.982

Review 2.  Emerging technologies and their impact on regulatory science.

Authors:  Elke Anklam; Martin Iain Bahl; Robert Ball; Richard D Beger; Jonathan Cohen; Suzanne Fitzpatrick; Philippe Girard; Blanka Halamoda-Kenzaoui; Denise Hinton; Akihiko Hirose; Arnd Hoeveler; Masamitsu Honma; Marta Hugas; Seichi Ishida; George En Kass; Hajime Kojima; Ira Krefting; Serguei Liachenko; Yan Liu; Shane Masters; Uwe Marx; Timothy McCarthy; Tim Mercer; Anil Patri; Carmen Pelaez; Munir Pirmohamed; Stefan Platz; Alexandre Js Ribeiro; Joseph V Rodricks; Ivan Rusyn; Reza M Salek; Reinhilde Schoonjans; Primal Silva; Clive N Svendsen; Susan Sumner; Kyung Sung; Danilo Tagle; Li Tong; Weida Tong; Janny van den Eijnden-van-Raaij; Neil Vary; Tao Wang; John Waterton; May Wang; Hairuo Wen; David Wishart; Yinyin Yuan; William Slikker
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2021-11-16

Review 3.  Mass spectrometry-based metabolomics: a guide for annotation, quantification and best reporting practices.

Authors:  Saleh Alseekh; Asaph Aharoni; Yariv Brotman; Kévin Contrepois; John D'Auria; Jan Ewald; Jennifer C Ewald; Paul D Fraser; Patrick Giavalisco; Robert D Hall; Matthias Heinemann; Hannes Link; Jie Luo; Steffen Neumann; Jens Nielsen; Leonardo Perez de Souza; Kazuki Saito; Uwe Sauer; Frank C Schroeder; Stefan Schuster; Gary Siuzdak; Aleksandra Skirycz; Lloyd W Sumner; Michael P Snyder; Huiru Tang; Takayuki Tohge; Yulan Wang; Weiwei Wen; Si Wu; Guowang Xu; Nicola Zamboni; Alisdair R Fernie
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 47.990

4.  Metabolonote: a wiki-based database for managing hierarchical metadata of metabolome analyses.

Authors:  Takeshi Ara; Mitsuo Enomoto; Masanori Arita; Chiaki Ikeda; Kota Kera; Manabu Yamada; Takaaki Nishioka; Tasuku Ikeda; Yoshito Nihei; Daisuke Shibata; Shigehiko Kanaya; Nozomu Sakurai
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2015-04-07

Review 5.  Methodological challenges and analytic opportunities for modeling and interpreting Big Healthcare Data.

Authors:  Ivo D Dinov
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 6.524

Review 6.  Standardizing the experimental conditions for using urine in NMR-based metabolomic studies with a particular focus on diagnostic studies: a review.

Authors:  Abdul-Hamid Emwas; Claudio Luchinat; Paola Turano; Leonardo Tenori; Raja Roy; Reza M Salek; Danielle Ryan; Jasmeen S Merzaban; Rima Kaddurah-Daouk; Ana Carolina Zeri; G A Nagana Gowda; Daniel Raftery; Yulan Wang; Lorraine Brennan; David S Wishart
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 4.290

7.  COordination of Standards in MetabOlomicS (COSMOS): facilitating integrated metabolomics data access.

Authors:  Reza M Salek; Steffen Neumann; Daniel Schober; Jan Hummel; Kenny Billiau; Joachim Kopka; Elon Correa; Theo Reijmers; Antonio Rosato; Leonardo Tenori; Paola Turano; Silvia Marin; Catherine Deborde; Daniel Jacob; Dominique Rolin; Benjamin Dartigues; Pablo Conesa; Kenneth Haug; Philippe Rocca-Serra; Steve O'Hagan; Jie Hao; Michael van Vliet; Marko Sysi-Aho; Christian Ludwig; Jildau Bouwman; Marta Cascante; Timothy Ebbels; Julian L Griffin; Annick Moing; Macha Nikolski; Matej Oresic; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Mark R Viant; Royston Goodacre; Ulrich L Günther; Thomas Hankemeier; Claudio Luchinat; Dirk Walther; Christoph Steinbeck
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 4.290

8.  The European Bioinformatics Institute's data resources 2014.

Authors:  Catherine Brooksbank; Mary Todd Bergman; Rolf Apweiler; Ewan Birney; Janet Thornton
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  The current state of drug discovery and a potential role for NMR metabolomics.

Authors:  Robert Powers
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 7.446

10.  PRIDE Inspector Toolsuite: Moving Toward a Universal Visualization Tool for Proteomics Data Standard Formats and Quality Assessment of ProteomeXchange Datasets.

Authors:  Yasset Perez-Riverol; Qing-Wei Xu; Rui Wang; Julian Uszkoreit; Johannes Griss; Aniel Sanchez; Florian Reisinger; Attila Csordas; Tobias Ternent; Noemi Del-Toro; Jose A Dianes; Martin Eisenacher; Henning Hermjakob; Juan Antonio Vizcaíno
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 5.911

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.