BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In our study we aimed to investigate the effect of esmolol, lidocaine and fentanyl on P-wave dispersion (Pwd), QT and corrected QT (QTc) durations and hemodynamic responses to endotracheal intubation during propofol induction. METHODS: A total of eighty adult patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status I or II aged 18 to 60 years were included in this prospective, randomised, double-blind study. All patients had control electrocardiograms (ECGs) done before anesthesia induction. The patients were randomised into four equal groups. The control group (Group C) received saline 5mL, the esmolol group (Group E) received esmolol 0.5mg.kg(-1), the fentanyl group (Group F) received fentanyl 2μg.kg(-1) and the lidocaine group (Group L) received lidocaine 1.5mg.kg(-1) before anesthesia induction. Anesthesia was induced with intravenous propofol. ECGs for all patients were performed during the 1(st) and 3(rd) minutes of induction, 3minutes after administration of muscle relaxant, and at 5minutes and 10minutes after intubation. Pwd and QT intervals were measured on all ECGs. QTc intervals were determined using the Bazett formula. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded before and after induction of anesthesia, immediately after intubation, and 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10minutes after intubation. RESULTS: Compared with control, HR significantly increased in Group C, Group L and Group F after intubation. However, in Group E, there was no significant difference in HR values between control and after intubation. Compared with control, MAP significantly increased in Group C and Group L after the intubation. However, in Group E and Group F, there was no significant difference in MAP values between control and after the intubation. Compared with control, Pwd significantly increased in Group C after intubation. In Group L, Group F and Group E, there was no significant difference in Pwd values between control and after the intubation. Compared with control, QTc duration significantly increased in Group C and L after the intubation. In Group F and Group E, there was no significant difference in QTc durations between control and after the intubation. CONCLUSION: We concluded that administration of esmolol before intubation prevents tachycardia and an increase in MAP, Pwd and QTc duration caused by laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In our study we aimed to investigate the effect of esmolol, lidocaine and fentanyl on P-wave dispersion (Pwd), QT and corrected QT (QTc) durations and hemodynamic responses to endotracheal intubation during propofol induction. METHODS: A total of eighty adult patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status I or II aged 18 to 60 years were included in this prospective, randomised, double-blind study. All patients had control electrocardiograms (ECGs) done before anesthesia induction. The patients were randomised into four equal groups. The control group (Group C) received saline 5mL, the esmolol group (Group E) received esmolol 0.5mg.kg(-1), the fentanyl group (Group F) received fentanyl 2μg.kg(-1) and the lidocaine group (Group L) received lidocaine 1.5mg.kg(-1) before anesthesia induction. Anesthesia was induced with intravenous propofol. ECGs for all patients were performed during the 1(st) and 3(rd) minutes of induction, 3minutes after administration of muscle relaxant, and at 5minutes and 10minutes after intubation. Pwd and QT intervals were measured on all ECGs. QTc intervals were determined using the Bazett formula. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded before and after induction of anesthesia, immediately after intubation, and 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10minutes after intubation. RESULTS: Compared with control, HR significantly increased in Group C, Group L and Group F after intubation. However, in Group E, there was no significant difference in HR values between control and after intubation. Compared with control, MAP significantly increased in Group C and Group L after the intubation. However, in Group E and Group F, there was no significant difference in MAP values between control and after the intubation. Compared with control, Pwd significantly increased in Group C after intubation. In Group L, Group F and Group E, there was no significant difference in Pwd values between control and after the intubation. Compared with control, QTc duration significantly increased in Group C and L after the intubation. In Group F and Group E, there was no significant difference in QTc durations between control and after the intubation. CONCLUSION: We concluded that administration of esmolol before intubation prevents tachycardia and an increase in MAP, Pwd and QTc duration caused by laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation.
Authors: Farshid Etaee; Morgan Tobin; Suchith Vuppala; Alireza Komaki; Brian P Delisle; Luigi Di Biase; John N Catanzaro; Andrea Natale; Claude S Elayi Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2021-10-21 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Abdullah Demirhan; Yusuf Velioglu; Hamit Yoldas; Ibrahim Karagoz; Mehmet Cosgun; Duygu Caliskan; Isa Yildiz; Murat Bilgi; Kemalettin Erdem Journal: Braz J Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2019-06-01
Authors: George Francisco S Santos; Luan Oliveira Ferreira; Bruna Gerrits Mattos; Eliniete J Fidelis; Alisson S de Souza; Paula S Batista; Cecilia A F Manoel; Diego Arthur C Cabral; Vanessa Jóia de Mello; Dielly Catrina Favacho Lopes; Moisés Hamoy Journal: Brain Behav Date: 2020-12-25 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Bruno de Queiroz Claudio; Marcelle Azevedo Nossar Costa; Filipe Penna; Mariana Teixeira Konder; Bruno Miguel Jorge Celoria; Luciana Lopes de Souza; Roberto Pozzan; Roberta Siuffo Schneider; Felipe Neves Albuquerque; Denilson Campos Albuquerque Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Murat Bilgi; Yusuf Velioglu; Hamit Yoldas; Mehmet Cosgun; Ahmet Yuksel; Ibrahim Karagoz; Isa Yildiz; Abdulhamit Es; Duygu Caliskan; Kemalettin Erdem; Abdullah Demirhan Journal: Braz J Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2020-06-01