Literature DB >> 23683259

Short-term results of catheter-directed intrathrombus thrombolysis versus anticoagulation in acute proximal deep vein thrombosis.

Chiu-Yang Lee1, Shiau-Ting Lai, Chun-Che Shih, Tao-Cheng Wu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a potentially progressive disease with complex clinical sequelae. The clinical practice guidelines of the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) recommend various treatments for all patients with objectively proven DVT. This study retrospectively compares enoxaparin with CDT on treatment efficacy and safety and the evolution of acute proximal DVT in the lower limbs.
METHODS: This study comprised 53 patients with acute proximal DVT, who received either CDT followed by intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) or adjusted subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) (enoxaparin) for 7-14 days. Warfarin was administered to all patients for at least 6 months. The study endpoints included the evolution of DVT and treatment efficacy and safety, which were assessed with frequent duplex ultrasounds, plethysmography, and venography. The mean duration of the follow-up was 15.2 months.
RESULTS: In the CDT group, patency of the iliofemoral vein segment was observed in 42.3% of the patients after 1 week (p < 0.001) and in 69.2% after 6 months. In the control group, patency was present in 15.4% of the patients after 3 months and in 38.5% after 6 months (p = 0.05). Femoral venous obstruction was found in 30.8% of CDT patients and in 61.5% of the control group (p = 0.05). Furthermore, femoral venous insufficiency was present in 46.2% of the CDT group and 53.9% of the control group after 6 months (p = 0.587). After 12 months, post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) was found in 19.2% of the CDT patients compared to 50% of the LMWH group (p = 0.04).
CONCLUSION: Duplex ultrasound analysis of thrombus progression is useful for assessing the treatment of a patient with acute proximal DVT. In this study, patients undergoing CDT experienced higher thrombus resolution and early recanalization of their veins, which may preserve venous function and further prevent development of post-thrombotic syndrome.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23683259     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcma.2013.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chin Med Assoc        ISSN: 1726-4901            Impact factor:   2.743


  4 in total

1.  Efficacy and Safety of Catheter-directed Thrombolysis in Preventing Post-thrombotic Syndrome: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Luai Alhazmi; Abdelmoneim Moustafa; Muhammad A Mangi; Ahmed Alamer; Ehab Eltahawy
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-02-28

2.  Catheter-directed thrombolysis for patients with acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wang Li; Zhang Chuanlin; Mu Shaoyu; Chao Hsing Yeh; Chen Liqun; Zhang Zeju
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2018-06-21

3.  Short-Term Anticoagulant Therapy and Thrombus Location Are Independent Risk Factors for Delayed Recanalization of Deep Vein Thrombosis.

Authors:  Chuanlin Zhang; Qining Fu; Yu Zhao; Shaoyu Mu; Liping Liu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-01-21

Review 4.  Safety of catheter-directed thrombolysis for the treatment of acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li Wang; Chuanlin Zhang; Shaoyu Mu; Chao Hsing Yeh; Liqun Chen; Zeju Zhang; Xueqin Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.889

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.