OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether elective caesarean section before 39 completed weeks of gestation increases the risk of adverse neonatal or maternal outcomes. DESIGN: Randomised controlled multicentre open-label trial. SETTING:Seven Danish tertiary hospitals from March 2009 to June 2011. POPULATION: Women with uncomplicated pregnancies, a single fetus, and a date of delivery estimated by ultrasound scheduled for delivery by elective caesarean section. METHODS: Perinatal outcomes after elective caesarean section scheduled at a gestational age of 38 weeks and 3 days versus 39 weeks and 3 days (in both groups ±2 days). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission within 48 hours of birth. Secondary outcomes were neonatal depression, NICU admission within 7 days, NICU length of stay, neonatal treatment, and maternal surgical or postpartum adverse events. RESULTS: Among women scheduled for elective caesarean section at 38⁺³ weeks 88/635 neonates (13.9%) were admitted to the NICU, whereas in the 39⁺³ weeks group 76/637 neonates (11.9%) were admitted (relative risk [RR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.65-1.15). Neonatal treatment with continuous oxygen for more than 1 day (RR 0.31; 95% CI 0.10-0.94) and maternal bleeding of more than 500 ml (RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.63-0.99) were less frequent in the 39 weeks group, but these findings were insignificant after adjustment for multiple comparisons. The risk of adverse neonatal or maternal outcomes, or a maternal composite outcome (RR 1.1; 95% CI 0.79-1.53) was similar in the two intervention groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study found no significant reduction in neonatal admission rate after ECS scheduled at 39 weeks compared with 38 weeks of gestation.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether elective caesarean section before 39 completed weeks of gestation increases the risk of adverse neonatal or maternal outcomes. DESIGN: Randomised controlled multicentre open-label trial. SETTING: Seven Danish tertiary hospitals from March 2009 to June 2011. POPULATION: Women with uncomplicated pregnancies, a single fetus, and a date of delivery estimated by ultrasound scheduled for delivery by elective caesarean section. METHODS: Perinatal outcomes after elective caesarean section scheduled at a gestational age of 38 weeks and 3 days versus 39 weeks and 3 days (in both groups ±2 days). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission within 48 hours of birth. Secondary outcomes were neonatal depression, NICU admission within 7 days, NICU length of stay, neonatal treatment, and maternal surgical or postpartum adverse events. RESULTS: Among women scheduled for elective caesarean section at 38⁺³ weeks 88/635 neonates (13.9%) were admitted to the NICU, whereas in the 39⁺³ weeks group 76/637 neonates (11.9%) were admitted (relative risk [RR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.65-1.15). Neonatal treatment with continuous oxygen for more than 1 day (RR 0.31; 95% CI 0.10-0.94) and maternal bleeding of more than 500 ml (RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.63-0.99) were less frequent in the 39 weeks group, but these findings were insignificant after adjustment for multiple comparisons. The risk of adverse neonatal or maternal outcomes, or a maternal composite outcome (RR 1.1; 95% CI 0.79-1.53) was similar in the two intervention groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study found no significant reduction in neonatal admission rate after ECS scheduled at 39 weeks compared with 38 weeks of gestation.
Authors: J Burgos; L Rodríguez; P Cobos; C Osuna; M Del Mar Centeno; R Larrieta; T Martínez-Astorquiza; L Fernández-Llebrez Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2015-07-16 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Kelly Yamasato; Pai-Jong Stacy Tsai; Marguerite Bartholomew; Marsha Durbin; Chieko Kimata; Bliss Kaneshiro Journal: Hawaii J Med Public Health Date: 2016-12
Authors: Ifeoma Muoto; Blair G Darney; Bernard Lau; Yvonne W Cheng; Mark W Tomlinson; Duncan R Neilson; Steven A Friedman; Joanne Rogovoy; Aaron B Caughey; Jonathan M Snowden Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2017-11-12 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: John P Newnham; Jan E Dickinson; Roger J Hart; Craig E Pennell; Catherine A Arrese; Jeffrey A Keelan Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2014-11-19 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Maria Elisabeth Moreira; Ana Paula Esteves Pereira; Saint Clair Gomes Junior; Ruth Guinsburg; Maria Fernanda Branco de Almeida; Silvana Granado Gama; Maria do Carmo Leal Journal: Reprod Health Date: 2016-10-17 Impact factor: 3.223