| Literature DB >> 23682351 |
Carmina Buşu1, Wei Li, Gloria Caldito, Tak Yee Aw.
Abstract
Oxidative stress-induced decrease in tissue or systemic glutathione (GSH) and damage to the vascular endothelium of the blood-brain barrier such as occurs in diabetes or stroke will have important implications for brain homeostasis. Endothelial proliferation or repair is crucial to preserving barrier function. Cell proliferation has been associated with increased intracellular GSH, but the kinetic and distribution of GSH during cell cycle is poorly understood. Here, we determined the influence of cellular GSH status on the early dynamics of nuclear-to-cytosol (N-to-C) GSH distribution (6-h interval) during proliferation in a human brain microvascular endothelial cell line (IHEC). Control IHECs exhibited two peak S-phases of the cell cycle at 48 and 60 h post seeding that temporally corresponded to peak nuclear GSH levels and expression of cdk1, the S-to-G2-to-M checkpoint controller, suggesting a link between cell cycle progression and nuclear GSH. Sustained inhibition of GSH synthesis delayed S-to-G2/M cell transition; cell arrest in the S-phase was correlated with decreased total nuclear GSH and increased nuclear expressions of chk2/phospho-chk2 and GADPH. The temporal correspondence of nuclear chk2 activation and GAPDH expression with S-phase prolongation is consistent with enhanced DNA damage response and extended time for DNA repair. Strikingly, when GSH synthesis was restored, cell transit time through S-phase remained delayed. Significantly, total nuclear GSH remained depressed, indicating a time lag between restored cellular GSH synthetic capacity and recovery of the nuclear GSH status. Interestingly, despite a delay in cell cycle recovery, nuclear expressions of chk2/phospho-chk2 and GAPDH resembled those of control cells. This means that restoration of nuclear DNA integrity preceded normalization of the cell cycle. The current results provide important insights into GSH control of endothelial proliferation with implications for cell repair or wound healing in recovery post-oxidative damage.Entities:
Keywords: DNA damage response; GSH and cell cycle; GSH and endothelial proliferation; brain microvascular endothelial cells; nuclear-to-cytosolic GSH distribution
Year: 2013 PMID: 23682351 PMCID: PMC3652486 DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2013.01.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Redox Biol ISSN: 2213-2317 Impact factor: 11.799
Fig. 1Temporal relationship between cell cycle S phase and nuclear-to-cytosolic (N-to-C) GSH distribution. Cells were cultured in complete M199 media at a density of 2×105/well in 6 well plates for 72 h. Media was changed at 28 h (arrow) and cell samples were harvested at every 6-h interval starting at 30 h post seeding for cell cycle analysis and cell fractionation and GSH measurements. Details on achievement of sustained GSH depletion and GSH recovery were described in the Methods section. (A) shows the percent of cells in the S-phase of the cell cycle for control, GSH-depleted (Treated), and GSH-restored (Reversal) cells. Results are mean±SEM and statistical analyses for effects of Group, times and group-time interactions are summarized in Table 1. (B) shows the concentrations of GSH in the cytosol (filled squares) or in the nucleus (open circle) for controls, treated or reversal. Results are mean±SEM and statistical analyses for effects of Group and Group means for cytosolic and nuclear GSH are summarized in Table 2. (C) illustrates the relationship between % of cell in the S-phase and nuclear GSH levels. Horizontal and vertical error bars represent mean±SEM of GSH and % cells in S-phase, respectively at times 36, 42, 48, 55, 60 and 66 h.
A Effects of Group, Time and Group-Time Interaction and Group Means for S-Phase among control cells, GSH-depleted (Treated) cells and GSH-restored (Reversal) cells.
| Effect | Mean±SD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Group | <0.01 | ||
| Control | 36 | 35.8±10.6 | |
| Treated | 48 | 44.4±14.7 | |
| Reversal | 36 | 43.9±14.7 | |
| Time point | <0.01 | ||
| 42 h | 20 | 33.1±3.6 | |
| 48 h | 20 | 49.3±6.3 | |
| 55 h | 20 | 53.9±17.9 | |
| 60 h | 20 | 52.7±7.5 | |
| 66 h | 20 | 32.2±2.3 | |
| 72 hour | 20 | 28.6±5.1 | |
| Group–time interaction | <0.01 | ||
| 42 h—Control | 6 | 30.3±4.6 | |
| Treated | 8 | 33.4±3.1 | |
| Reversal | 6 | 34.9±1.7 | |
| 48 h—Control | 6 | 44.5±9.4 | |
| Treated | 8 | 52.8±1.5 | |
| Reversal | 6 | 50.3±3.3 | |
| 55 h—Control | 6 | 27.7±4.3 | |
| Treated | 8 | 66.7±4.4 | |
| Reversal | 6 | 63.9±1.5 | |
| 60 h—Control | 6 | 51.6±5.4 | |
| Treated | 8 | 52.4±9.4 | |
| Reversal | 6 | 53.8±8.1 | |
| 66 h—Control | 6 | 33.4±3.4 | |
| Treated | 8 | 30.7±2.0 | |
| Reversal | 6 | 32.5±0.6 | |
| 72 h—Control | 6 | 27.4±4.7 | |
| Treated | 8 | 30.5±4.8 | |
| Reversal | 6 | 28.1±5.9 | |
N—number of observations.
SD—Standard deviation.
Control significantly lower than the other 2 groups.
Significantly higher than 42 h, 66 h, &and 72 h.
Control significantly lower than the other 2 groups.
Significantly higher than 42 h, 55 h, 66 h and 72 h; troughs at 42 h, 55 h, 66 h, and 72 h; peaks at 48 h and 60 h.
Significant at 1% level (p-value<0.01).
Effect of group and group means for cytosolic and nuclear GSH among control cells, GSH-depleted (treated) cells and GSH-restored (reversal) cells.
| Effect | Mean±SD | Effect | Mean±SD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | <0.01 | Group | <0.01 | ||||
| Control | 54 | 1.69±1.18 | Control | 54 | 0.07±0.03 | ||
| Treated | 54 | 0.43±0.33 | Treated | 54 | 0.037±0.01 | ||
| Reversal | 54 | 0.64±0.28 | Reversal | 54 | 0.042±0.02 |
N—number of observations.
SD—Standard deviation.
Control significantly higher than the other 2 groups.
Significant at 1% level (p-value<0.01).
Fig. 2Time course of protein expression of cdk1, a cell cycle checkpoint controller of S-to-G2-to-M progression. (A) Western blot analyses of cdk1 expression from 0–to–72 h in the cytosolic or nuclear fractions prepared from control IHECs (Control), cells treated with BSO to maintain low GSH (Treated) or cells treated with BSO that was subsequently removed to allow for GSH recovery (Reversal). (B) shows the quantitative data of band intensities of cytosolic (closed circles) or nuclear (open circles) cdk1 expression relative to β-actin or H1, respectively for the 3 treatment groups. Results are mean±SEM for 4 separate blots. C illustrates the N-to-C ratios of cdk1. Statistical differences for time-group interactions among the 3 groups in (B and C) are denoted by letters a, b, c that are explained in the statistical analyses on the figure.
Fig. 3Kinetics of expression of nuclear chk2 and its phosphorylation status. (A) Western blot analyses of nuclear expression of chk2 and phospho-chk2 from 0–to–72 h in nuclear fractions prepared from control IHECs, cells treated with BSO to maintain low GSH (Treated) or cells treated with BSO that was subsequently removed to allow for GSH recovery (Reversal). (B) shows the quantitative data of band intensities of nuclear chk2 (closed circles) or phospho-chk2 (open circles) expression relative to H1 for the 3 treatment groups. Results are mean±SEM for 4 separate blots. (C) illustrates the N-to-C ratios of p-chk2-to-chk2. Statistical differences for time-group interactions among the 3 groups in (B and C) are denoted by letters a, c that are explained in the statistical analyses on the figure.
Fig. 4Time course of cytosolic and nuclear expression of GAPDH, an index of DNA damage response. (A) Western blot analyses of expression of GAPDH from 0 to 72 h in cytosolic and nuclear fractions prepared from control IHECs, cells treated with BSO to maintain low GSH (Treated) or cells treated with BSO that was subsequently removed to allow for GSH recovery (Reversal). (B) shows the quantitative data of band intensities of cytosolic GAPDH (closed circles) or nuclear GAPDH (open circles) expression relative to β-actin or H1, respectively, for the 3 treatment groups. Results are mean+SEM for 4 separate blots. (C) illustrates the N-to-C ratios of nuclear-to-cytosolic GAPDH. Statistical differences for time-group interactions among the 3 groups in (B and C) are denoted by letters a, b, c that are explained in the statistical analyses on the figure.
Fig. 5Endothelial cell cycle responses under physiological and GSH-deficient states. During cell proliferation, cytosol-to-nuclear GSH transport is increased under physiological GSH conditions. An increase in intra-nuclear reducing environment promotes gene transcription that brings about normal cell cycle progression wherein DNA synthesis occurs during the S-phase. Normal nuclear cdk1expression controls S-to-G2-to-M cell transition. Decreased cytosolic GSH due to inhibition of synthesis or enhanced oxidative stress results in decreased nuclear GSH import. Low nuclear GSH induces a DNA damage response, presumably due to increased oxidative DNA damage. An increase in chk-2 activation (increased p-chk2) and nuclear GAPDH accumulation contributes to a prolongation of the S-phase and a delay in cell cycle progression. In part, increased p-chk2 promotes the retention of cdk1 in the cytosol; a decrease in nuclear cdk1 delays the S-to-G2-to-M transition. Significantly, the lengthening of the S-phase allows for extended time for DNA repair.